this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
249 points (98.4% liked)

Not The Onion

21930 readers
1314 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] busted_Anoose@aussie.zone 1 points 37 minutes ago

Well of course, all the republican voters are complete morons. trump was elected twice by these muppets.

I expected this move to come when the AI bubble bursts...

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

This headline is sensationalized for clicks.

A 5% non-controlling equity stake is not "nationalization." Words have meanings, and this isn't the correct one.

Nationalization generally means the government takes ownership or control of a private company or industry. A small, non-controlling financial stake doesn't accomplish that. If anything, it's a form of public investment intended to let taxpayers share in potential financial upside, not government control over the company.

You can certainly argue whether it's good policy. You can argue it's a step toward greater government involvement in private industry. Those are legitimate discussions. But calling it "nationalization" is simply inaccurate.

This kind of exaggerated framing is becoming far too common on Lemmy. Every issue gets dressed up with the most emotionally charged headline possible because outrage drives engagement. It doesn't inform people; it just reinforces existing biases and degrades the quality of discussion.

We should be better than clickbait headlines and loaded terminology. If we're going to criticize a policy, let's criticize what it actually is, not what makes for the most sensational title.

Edit: removed em dash. Anyone else having the auto correct put in em dashes!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

If anything, it’s a form of public investment intended to let taxpayers share in potential financial upside

Getting in on the AI market right when it's about to take off, certainly. This isn't going to be a preemptive bailout for an industry that's run out of private-sector sucker money.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

They’re doing this to have the taxpayers assume all the risk while privatizing the profits. Fascism

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Could have sworn even Bernie Sanders was saying some shit like the public needs to hold a stake in AI. It's good he has taken an anti-AI stance, but I don't think making everyone a bagholder is a good path forward.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 14 hours ago

Don't complain. Let then nationalize all the companies making AI too.

We need social media to be treated as a public utility. Make all the content algorithms open source, and require Activity Pub.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's because "nationalizing" in this context is still about putting more money into the pockets of the few. The country does not benefit from this. Only the rich.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Right, they’re only doing it so they can point to it as a reason for a bailout. Fuck them, it’d be a lot cooler if we seize their assets and throw them in prison when the scam collapses.

[–] user_name@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago

It’s just a scam to cash out at sky-high valuations before the bubble pops. Trying to stick the fucking scam on the taxpayers. The OpenAI is being billed as a “gift” but no way Anthropic and X.ai are doing anything but selling.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

And start a chain of government gas stations, too

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Privatize the profits, socialize the losses.

[–] darkmarx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The market is about to implode. They want the government bailout to be easier while lining their pockets in the meantime.

[–] itrealgood@mander.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

This is regulatory capture in action

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 day ago

At this point, a 'not the onion' article about their administration would be something normal. We've come to expect absolute nonsense.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  • Regulate AI- yes they should
  • Nationalize and use for propaganda- no they shouldn't

AI can find anything that's been used for training and tint or lie about any info given out. It has no ethics. The government controlling it, especially this government, would be fucking scary.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago

I thought it was Bernie?