Controversial take incoming: framing art as an intellectual property phenomenon is itself a capitalist stance and it highlights our lack of imagination with regards to what contributes value.
My point being that intellectual property law is fundamentally broken and that it serves capital by definition
Controversial take incoming: framing art as an intellectual property phenomenon is itself a capitalist stance and it highlights our lack of imagination with regards to what contributes value.
My point being that intellectual property law is fundamentally broken and that it serves capital by definition