this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
183 points (92.2% liked)

politics

31347 readers
2355 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fifield, 41, is the second woman to allege this week that Platner engaged in nonconsensual sexual conduct. Jenny Racicot, 41, who said she previously dated Platner, told The Post and other outlets on Monday that he sexually assaulted her in late 2021, leading a growing number of allies to drop their endorsements and call on him to withdraw from the race for a Maine seat in the U.S. Senate. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), his most influential and prominent supporter, said he spoke with Platner on Tuesday and urged him to withdraw from his campaign to unseat Susan Collins, the incumbent Republican.

Platner, 41, a Marine Corps veteran and oyster farmer, also denied Racicot’s allegation but said on Monday that he was “mindful of the political reality” that the reporting will “inflict” on his campaign and was “taking the time to reflect on the best path forward.”

Fifield initially told The Post about the alleged condom removal during a June 20 interview that was off the record. She said she decided to speak publicly about it Tuesday in part because, she said, she wanted to show that Racicot was not alone in experiencing issues with Platner involving sexual consent.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FullPenguin@lemmy.world 92 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Fifield, who spent 7 years working for the Heritage Foundation and made all of these accusations a few months ago without any evidence, is the reason why people are so hesitant to take the more recent one seriously.

If the Heritage Foundation is doing anything to take you down, you're probably doing something right.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Heritage foundation.... Yeah they are pretty much all liars . plus aren't they against contraception?

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago

It’s a long listen but worth checking out How Conservatism Won by Robert Evans. He lays out in a clear concise way “how a consortium of rich failsons got together to fund a network of right wing think tanks and shift American culture in a fun new direction. (note: it was not actually fun at all).”

The Heritage Foundation is the at the root of a lot of the issues in the U.S. right now, it really can't be overstated just how malicious they are. They write the policies and vet the candidates, if they're not the actual shadowy cabal they definitely share some membership.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So Maine's choices are an alleged sexual assualter or a known and confirmed adjudicated rapist and 99.9% likely a pedo protector known as Susan Collins? Two extremely shitty choices, I'll admit.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Platner could drop out and allow a better candidate to run.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

The Politco story is well sourced with therapist and boyfriend messages from before Platner was ever in politics.

Sometimes a broken clock is correct, this is one of those times.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] webadict@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago (40 children)

I don't wanna be that guy, but purposefully removing a condom during sex without consent is rape.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We’ve got weirdos pretending that this waters down the term rape in this thread, lovely.

When you are having sex with someone, presumably you are trusting them? You are trusting them to be safe, to not push boundaries, to do only things you consent to do.

When someone stealths you, they are saying that they don’t give a fuck about you. That trust was misplaced. They are willing to do something to you that you explicitly did not want. Are they going to stop there? (The same type also often pushes for anal/“accidentally” attempts penetration there.)

It’s terrifying and traumatic. Your head races - are you current on your birth control? How likely do you think it is that this guy has some disease? And you get a physical reminder that your consent didn’t matter, the sensation and needing to clean up after if they finished.

It’s also so goddamned common. It’s trivialized.

If you slip the condom off without someone’s consent, you are a rapist. Rape fucks victims up whether it’s a stranger in the bushes or a FWB stealthing you.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Thank you for pointing out why it is rape. It appears to be needed for some people here.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 14 points 3 months ago

You can be that guy. I'll be that guy along with you.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Why would you not wanna be that guy? That’s the reality of it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The other allegation is also rape since he didn't stop when she asked him to multiple times

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I hate politics. And this is precisely why.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes politics sucks. The sad part is it only gets worse the less you pay attention, but because you're not paying attention, all is good.

This whole thread though feels like two bots arguing about which one is more right.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 months ago (17 children)

She estimated that Platner removed condoms without her consent at least six times when they had sex at both of their residences in D.C. during their two-year, on-and-off relationship. She said she told him that she was upset about it but that he would make light of the situation.

“I confronted him both during and after [sex] because he knew that I was not on birth control and how dangerous that was,” she told The Post in one interview. In another, she said: “He would act like cute about it, like ‘Oh sneaky me.’”

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

Fucking gross

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If the guy has any actual desire to do good in the world, the best thing he could do now is drop out. Given his stated politics, I figured the tattoo was from when he was young and stupid, like he said, but this shit... People don't outgrow this shit.

He needs to go.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I dug up his old Reddit comment about rape victims earlier because I was curious and couldn’t quite remember the details:

“Holy fuck, how about people just take some responsibility for themselves and not get so fucked up they wind up having sex with someone they don’t mean to? Men and women, you make a choice to consume enough of a substance to lose your self control. So if you don’t want to be in a comprising situation, act like an adult for fucks sake.”

He needs to drop out.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (18 children)

How is it that Trump can say he grabs women by the pussy and still become president and Platner is so far only accused of sexual assault and his support is quickly eroding and he's being asked to leave the race? Can it be the Democrats inability to articulate a response to the rigid parameters imposed on behavior by those in the party who insist such adherence is mandatory? The Republican response to Platner staying in the race is a known quantity that can be addressed and diminished even without the mountain of ammunition the Republicans can give Democrats. Yet the Democrats seem completely unprepared for the fight.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

Maybe, and this is me having to think a few seconds... Progressive voters align more with moral behavior than Trump voters? A lot of progressives want things that make people's lives better because they believe it is the right thing, and I would argue that raping people is a thing that they would deem as bad.

Now, if your argument is that this is only an accusation and not proven... That's a little more understandable. I would argue that this most recent accusation seems very credible. It's also kinda fucking weird to say "If they're okay with the child rapist Trump, we should be okay with an adult rapist!" That's better in a way that sort of makes light of rape.

I feel like if you sexually assault someone, you should never be allowed power should not be a controversial opinion, but I fucking bet it is.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago

How is it that Trump can say he grabs women by the pussy and still become president and Platner is so far only accused of sexual assault and his support is quickly eroding and he's being asked to leave the race?

In case the other guy minced words a little too much, I'll say it a bit more directly. Sexual misconduct and rape are bad. Left leaning voters do not like rapists, apparently right leaning voters do. Your concern about the fact that the right still elected trump, but that the left seems to be abandoning platner is effectively saying that you are perfectly fine with overlooking rape if it means that your political team gets a win. This makes you an asshole.

Hope that cleared it up.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›