politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Fucking gross
I really don't understand women. What would compel a person to have sex with someone who raped them 5 times already?
Men get stuck in bad and abusive relationships as well.
She said they dated on and off for about a year. Doesn't sound like being "stuck" in a relationship. I get it that people have issues. I guess I'm just lucky I never had to deal with anything like that.
Yeah relationships can be complicated. It's not only women that get caught up in it though.
I'm going to take a wild educated guess that this particular woman's conservative background set her up to allow men to take advantage of her in various ways as a pattern, but that is admittedly speculating based on lived experience.
Yeah, I guess you're right. I still don't get this though. There are bad matches, toxic relationships and then there's being raped and agreeing to more sex. Just fucked up people going through things I guess. The question about Platner is can you really change? Or having issues 10 years ago means you can never be trusted again? And if that's the standard should we trust his ex?
Anyway, I think the issue was making him the candidate in the first place. It was clear form the beginning he's toxic. People pretended it's fine as long as they could but there's a limit.
Pretty sure this happened only 5 years ago in 2021. And no, I don't think that's enough time to change enough as a person to be trusted with a seat in the Senate personally.
I absolutely agree. He should have never been chosen to begin with considering his complete history.
He dated Fifield (the one accusing him of removing condoms) over 13 years ago. I thought the rape allegation are also from decade ago but you're right, it was 5 years ago. So yeah, looks like he didn't change.
FYI, the other allegations are also rape.
He entered her home without her knowing, then forced himself on her despite her telling him over and over that she didn't want it.
He also came inside her after she explicitly asked him not to (she wasn't on birth control).
Dude is a fucking Nazi rapist. We should be relieved that this came out.
Ohhhh hahaha our interaction pissed someone off enough to go through my recent post history and downvote every single comment.
My goodness, the misogynists on this site get so cranky hahaha
Sorry, comments like that do not fit the agenda in this thread. That's like implying women can lie for money. Impossible.
Acknowledging that relationships are complicated and it's not just women who get caught up in them is not equivalent to accusing rape victims of lying for money.
Mind fuckery. You know, manipulation, gaslighting and internalized misogyny.
Ya'll pretending like men like this, especially men who seek power, don't commonly sexually assault and rape women.
You should read up on Occam's razor
"Tits out of our hands" on a post about forcible rape. Stay classy.