this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
228 points (92.5% liked)

Greentext

8394 readers
479 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 11 minutes ago

The OOP desperately needs some class consciousness.

Why are ~~Western devs~~ game publishers like this?

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

TLOU2 had a good story. Aloy doesn't look like a goblin. Kratos reflecting on his past is good character development.

Meanwhile, your gacha waifu just had her panties censored in the latest update.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 hours ago

Western games are really good though

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 32 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, the devs are desperately trying to make whatever they can with the limited time and suffocatingly safe direction they're given by the executive suite, who know that the game will give a much faster return on their investment than a well-made game given the time and freedom it needs to flourish. Game companies don't exist to make games, they exist to make money; they've long since figured out that bad games made quickly make better money than good games made slowly. If they could sell empty boxes for more money, they would.

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 18 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

007, mewgenics, mina, fh6, slay the spire.

I swear gamers are just incapable of happiness.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What's the reason for these specific games to be mentioned? Can't say I'm particularly interested in any of them. But I've never heard of fh6.

[–] Quadrexium@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

fall hout 6ewvegas

look the 2000s were weird we did a lot of drugs

[–] Mountainaire@lemmy.world 73 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

idk, but who cares? Just ignore them all and go for indie titles. I had way more fun with FTL and Noita than RDR2, etc.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 2 hours ago

Ok, I originally read indie titties

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 32 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I love FTL, but weird choice for an unfun AAA game, as RDR2 is actually one of the best AAA games in "recent" history.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

i just got really bored slicing bullets, watching those testicles and waiting for them to expand or shrink

what a prank. i need a bulk crafting mod that works on console.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago

RDR2 was great narrative. Combined with a Westworld-like + GTA sandbox, it was super fun and immersive. Rare for a game regardless of its budget.

[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

...maybe you're missing their point that fun is relative and what's fun for you might not be for them.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 16 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

No, I don't think I do. The goal of their message is to point out that the modern AAA game industry makes similar, boring and repetitive games. RDR2 isn't that, it's a genuine piece of art. Why pick the one good apple from a pile of bad apples, when complaining about the aforementioned pile of mostly bad apples.

[–] Droechai@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Rdr2 also released 8 years ago, so not really current. I would use Kingdom Come 2 as example but I dont know if it qualifies as AAA instead of AA

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 5 minutes ago

In my defense, I put "recent" in quotes.

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because there were plenty of great games released. You and other terminally online gamers, just ignore them and want to bitch. Time is a flat circle.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 9 points 11 hours ago

Did you mean to reply to another comment? It's like, completely unrelated to what I said, I was praising a game, not bitching. Nor did I say anything to indicate that I'm terminally online or a gamer.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 48 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Chances are strong this is in response to a woman making a game.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I agree. I hate how legit complaints about the hypercapitalistic hellscape of modern gaming are overshadowed by the constant poop throwing of racist/misogynist idiots

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 19 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

While I understand your point, a crappy game is a crappy game, dudes make shit games all the time

And folks don't bring their demographic into it when that happens 😅

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 6 points 13 hours ago

Mainly management issues. Time constraint. See, some games, like those successfull indie games, are passion projects. Often forged by one mind.

Big companies hire people for a project. You see an issue with gameplay? Too bad youre just the designer, no one wants to hear your opinion. You lose passion, if you had any to begin with. Then companies tend to see workers as slaves. Bend the knee or else. Id not go the extra mile for benefits barely matching the lawful minimum. The new avengers show will drop nxt year? Gotta ship a product which normally needs years of development. You cut features to meet deadlines. Sometimes this is also because management thinks only pressure makes people work at all.

[–] anon232@lemmy.zip 19 points 17 hours ago

Western game bad when unfuckable player character, or characters above the age of 18.

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I want the filthy devs listening their community!!!

The community:

1000001056

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 11 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

What does "fail" even mean? I do have a great distaste for "AAA" titles roughly post-Skyrim, but AFAIK most AAA games succeed financially. Even Fallout76, widely regarded as a flop in terms of critical reception and player sentiment, performed reasonably well, even if not quite as well as previous Fallout titles.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

There's been a growing number of AAA flops in the past 5 years. Here's an incomplete list:

  • Concord
  • Skull and Bones
  • Marathon
  • Redfall
  • Highguard
  • Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League
  • Saint's Row (2022)
  • Lord of the Rings: Gollum
  • Star Wars Outlaws
  • Marvel's Avengers
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I really don't want to consider Outlaws a flop even though i know the studios do. I played it (public library copy) a year after release and it was plenty fun. I'd probably pay $15 for it.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 3 points 7 hours ago

Honestly watching a let's play of Gollum was the most hilarious thing I've seen in a long time. Like 10 hours of laughs. I'm not even sure if it counts as bad anymore if you categorise it as a comedy game

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Pains me to see Marathon on this list. The game is so good in so many ways. Gun play, world building, narrative, characters. The quality is truly there. Their problem was that they made the wrong genre. Why they would spend so much time and money on an extraction shooter is beyond me.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

Because extraction shooters make money.

Well, some extraction shooters.

Ok, actually a very tiny fraction of extraction shooters make money.

But we can totally tempt people away from it, and make all that money for ourselves!

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

there have been a pretty large number of live service disasters in recent memory. from CA's Hyenas being so terrible that it got shelved after a playtest, to Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League (blech) crashing out within a year, to Concord getting pulled off the Sony store within months, to most recently Highguard lasting a mere 45 days... and that's just what I can remember off the top of my head. Every single one of those games was a flop, with Concord famously losing Sony millions of dollars.

all this amidst a sea of studio layoffs happening year over year, I think it's fair to say that the western AAA scene is currently floundering.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I don't think it's fair to lump live service games in with all AAA games, that's its own very specific kind of failure and a lot easier to explain with greed and shit management at the helm.

Look at other recent AAA failures and it's a very different story, though still ultimately failure.

[–] tehevilone@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

And to be fair to 76, it genuinely is a good MMO-style game now, IMO. It'll never be at the level of FNV/FO4/Skyrim as far as community sentiment goes, since you can't mod the shit out of it, but compared to launch when I finally went back to it last year, I put enough time into it again to feel like I got my money's worth.

[–] lime@feddit.nu -2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

i'm assuming this is about fallout 2, considering the ui?

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Fallout 2 is just the framing for the meme, its very much not about fallout 2.

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago

Fallout 2 slaps. One of my biggest annoyances of corporate game dev shenanigans is that we can't have an enhanced edition for android.

[–] Forester@pawb.social -1 points 11 hours ago

Whoosh

I'm not OP but I'd wager it's about fallout 3 fallout 4 fallout 76 Skyrim ESO etc...