this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
295 points (96.2% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3773 readers
125 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

Audiobooks Read by Dessalines

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 102 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)
  • Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) —  Co-leading the initiative
  • Rep. Adam Gray (D-CA) — Co-leading the initiative
  • Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ)
  • Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV)
  • Rep. Don Davis (D-NC)
  • Rep. Vicente Gonzalez Jr. (D-TX)
  • Rep. Laura Gillen (D-NY)
  • Rep. Janelle Bynum (D-OR)
  • Rep. Kristin McDonald Rivet (D-MI)
  • Rep. Maggie Goodlander (D-NH)
  • Jessica Killin (candidate)
  • Marlene Galán Woods (candidate)
  • Bobby Pulido (candidate)
[–] protist@retrofed.com 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The man right here. Time to send some letters

[–] pinto@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

They'll listen to corporate donations, not their constituents.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Check this list against the Democrats who caved and ended the government shutdown.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Look at all those DINOS

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 88 points 2 months ago

Republicans: we're going to try to repeal the 17th amendment and have permanent control of the Senate.

Democrats: like 6 socialists got elected, we're going to shoot each other now.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 2 months ago (1 children)

These are the fascists who were screeching at you to just suck up a bit of genocide and vote blue no matter who. The ratchet effect is so real.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm still gonna scream blue no matter who, but I'd really prefer it's not these guys.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (10 children)

"Blue no matter who" is a peace deal, which these guys are breaking.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (13 children)

In an intelligent, rational country demsocialists and liberals would each have their own separate party.

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The US is constitutionally saddled with first past the post voting, which makes more than two parties difficult to represent at the national level. For some reason the two existing parties are unwilling to change that.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

No we aren't. It's tradition. We can switch to STAR

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Misinformation. I literally vote rank choice in the US.

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Over a dozen states have already banned ranked choice voting. The establishment knows that if it were to catch on then elected officials will more accurately reflect the actual will of the people and undermine the liberal hegemony, so they banned it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

13 corpo-democrats that need to be primaried with democratic socialists.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Israel first coalition

[–] noahm@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, 13 is not a lot. It's certainly possible that they've got silent backing of many of the other dems in the house, but even if they do, the fact that they're silent about it tells you that they know this is a risky position to take.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

They've been doing this for a while though. It only takes a handful of votes to torpedo a bill, so they get a handful of Democrats in safe districts to be the bad guy of the week. The rest of the party gets to look progressive without any risk of actually passing a good bill.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That's 6% of Dems in the house, and we get some slackjaw crowing about scratching liberals. This could be the rise of a new, better Democratic party, and people are still insistent on being unpleasant about it!

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t say the party is. The party itself is very firmly neo-lib to centrist and pulling further right. I would say that individuals associated with the party are democratic socialist, but at this point they should start their own party.

Let the Republican party collapse, the dems take up the right wing reins, and then actually have a party that pulls left full of progressives and socialists. Pipe dream, I know.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

If you start your own party you will not find it easy to get on the ballot.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Very disappointing. This is why I haven't donated to the party itself in years, only to individuals.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

13 useless "representatives"

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Oh look, it's my shitbag congressman. I'm actually really disappointed. All the electoralism talk made me finally bother to go vote in this primary after sitting a few out and... both establishment incumbents won in a landslide. I fucking hate my district. A lot of them fall into the "embarrassed Republican" category of Dems. There are some nice people out there. I did work along with our local DSA years ago, it's just not nearly enough to overcome the fucking NIMBYs/Zionists who live here.

[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Name and shame. Who are the 13?

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

At least they are outing themselves so we easily know who to vote out

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

This is why I say im a progressive is someone asks me. Im definitely not a liberal. These a holes prioritize economic liberalism at the cost of social liberalism every time they are pressed. Vote em out.

load more comments
view more: next ›