People want war criminals who talk good. That's the bar for the average American.
darthelmet
joined 2 years ago
Oh I was looking at system requirements on the store page. Is that accurate?
There's a spattering of steam games that don't list Linux support. Probably the ones I play the most are Deep Rock Galactic and Last Epoch. Outside of Steam I play TFT a lot, which doesn't work on Linux since they added the anti-cheat software.
I got a new PC recently so unfortunately I am now on Windows 11. I’ve been wanting to make the swap to Linux but I can’t really make a clean break because at least some of the games I play a lot won’t work on Linux. I do think I’m gonna try to set up another hard drive with Linux on it to try to slowly start learning it and ideally move over anything that I can over there eventually and just keep the windows drive for those few games.
Does anyone have any recommendations related to that? Distro for gaming/ease of use? What’s the best option for setting up the dual boot? Anything I wouldn’t have thought of that’s relevant?
“Again.”
For leaks there is rarely going to be a way to know for sure. So you have to evaluate whether or not you think it's reasonable given what you do know. We do know that they've done this kind of thing in other races. We do know that the party is funded by capitalist interests. We do know that the campaign didn't really put forward a positive agenda and therefore had to look for other ways to gain advantages. As far as the character of the people/party involved, I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt knowing all the awful things they've been complicit in. Lastly it doesn't seem like it's some crazy infeasible or irrational thing to do. We're not talking about demonic sex cults or mind control or some nonsense. We're talking about political maneuvering through media strategy during a campaign. The objective was rational even if it was unconscionable.
As you said, they thought it was a good strategy to optimize their chances at winning. Not only did they turn out to be wrong, but the act of trying to instigate one of the only two political parties we're stuck with to take further right positions and possibly nominate a very right wing candidate is not an acceptable byproduct of the strategy.
Do I think we were headed in that direction anyway? Probably. As long as the parties aren't willing to address the fundamental problems with capitalism, the door will always be open to a right wing demagogue who knows the right things to say. But spending your effort to speed that along instead of, idk, working on actually popular social programs, certainly didn't help.
Did you not read about the part where their plan was to boost the more extreme candidates in the primary to try to get the rest of them to move further right in hopes that it would make an easier opponent for them?
That they realized they screwed up after the fact doesn't change that.
Yeah you're right, it's nothing compared to helping Trump get elected.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/missteps-doomed-clinton-campaign/story?id=43422676
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/
Yeah look how well it’s worked. Far right nutjobs have totally not been normalized. Nope.
Ah yes. Give money to the “progressive party” so it can do progressive things like funding ads for far right republicans in primaries:
Or backing “centrist” primary candidates against progressive candidates.
Very progressive. This amalgamation of rich people’s money and consultants is a great political ally.
The point isn't to cede ground and compromise with them. The point is to try to show them that they've been duped about who their enemies are. It might still take some time to deprogram them, but if we could at least get them to put that all on hold and focus on the class issue, maybe we can actually get somewhere instead of spinning in circles.
view more: next ›
Cool. Didn't know about that site. Thanks.