this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
933 points (99.3% liked)

Lefty Memes

7126 readers
45 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Try to use alt text or image descriptions to allow for greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We encourage alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.


  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alapakala@quokk.au 125 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 140 points 4 days ago (26 children)

"You'll agree more with republicans as you age" was always something I heard from right wing nut jobs when I became voting age. In fact, the opposite has happened.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 57 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I often heard something similar, in spirit. Roughly translated: "if you aren't a commie when you're 20, then you're heartless; but if you're still a commie when you're 40, then you're brainless."

I'm 40 this year. Still a communist. I guess that makes me brainless?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I’ve heard it as “if you’re still a communist when you’re 40, then you’re poor.”

You can also substitute communist with socialist or liberal.

Also I’ve heard another version where 20 is democrat, 30 is Republican, and 40 is libertarian.

It’s all “my team” kind of bullshit.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

At 20, you're a democrat because you have dreams and hopes, but being young and poor, you depend on the system's generosity to get successful.

At 30, you are a Republican, because you start having a life of comfort, and even if you refuse to admit it, you know well your comfort relies on some other people working hard in miserable conditions, but you really like your comfort, and you rationalize this with "economic growth will lift everyone from poverty" even though you really want some people to do menial tasks for you, and for cheap, and you want everything to be cheap, so people producing goods and delivering services can't be paid too much, and can't have it too easy, or they'll quit and you'll lose your benefits!

At 40, you're a libertarian because you finally made peace with the idea that there will be poor, there will be rich, it is what it is, but now you want your voice level to match your bank account. Why would you pay more taxes (in absolute) than most and at the same time let these folks decide what to do with the money?? You'll manage the money you want to give to the community, and it will only go to the charities and projects that deserve your generosity. That way things are much fairer.
You didn't totally forget about the you at 20, but you look at your kid, and decide we don't need free education or some shit, because low/no taxes mean you can save enough to pay for their education. And for the poor, well: you were poor at 20, so they should just take example on you and work hard to get out of poverty!

If you recognize yourself in this, know that at all ages, you were probably a PoS, but only with the age did you reveal your true colors!

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I started out libertarian in my twenties, then democrat in my thirties, now socialist in my forties, and I'm not poor.

[–] Zoop@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course you're not poor. You're ten squirrels! I bet you're loaded with acorns in all the best stash spots! Good on you, I say.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

I originally heard this as:

If you're a Republican at 20, then you're heartless. If you're a Democrat at 40, then you're broke.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

If you're not a leftist when you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a leftist when you're 40, you have no brain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] qaeta@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Truth is, it was never about age. It was about asset accumulation. The more you had to protect, the more right-wing you got, generally speaking. There are obviously exceptions.

They fucked everything for younger generations so hard now though that we AREN'T able to accumulate assets to the degree where that shift happens in large numbers anymore. So we are staying left-wing for the most part. Unfortunately they seem to have realized their error and decided to just brainwash the really young gens with AI slop brainrot instead.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My aunt said "When you're older and wiser, you'll understand".

I'm now a Democratic Socialist and 37. I still do not understand and have, in fact, become more leftist with age.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

She was technically correct, just not how she thought she would be

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There used to be a bit more truth to that statement. But not anymore. I'm exactly 43 years old.

Republicans today aren't the Republicans of my childhood and youth. They were bad then, but holy shit they're terrible now.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

37 here. Republicans when I was a kid were Hank Hill. Hank Hill had a heart and a working brain, though, so I have no doubt he would be disgusted by what his party turned into.

[–] aaaa@piefed.world 2 points 3 days ago

He already was.

Though his specific problem was George W. Bush's weak handshake

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (13 children)

You get more and more immersed in right wing propaganda as you get older. You get exposed to more reactionary institutions, you find yourself increasingly segregated from people of different races and income scales, you suffer the psychological torments of the capitalist rat race more nakedly, and it all adds up.

Lots of people I grew up with in high school are Trump Republicans now. They weren't MAGA shitheads in school, mostly because they were blank slates. They were warm to ideas like "Free College" when they were in college and cooled on it once they graduated (or flunked out). They were "moderate" when they had friends who were coming out of the closet and dealing with racial abuse and coming home in body bags during the Iraq War. But they grew increasingly right-wing when the law firm and the O&G offices and techbro money orgies demanded it of them.

Even before AI started straight up poisoning people's brains, they were getting into Facebook groups and Discord channels that rotted them. Nevermind the endless barrage of NYT / WaPo "Why These Trump Voters Need To Be Listened To" articles and CBS / ABC "Transgender Athletes: A Threat To Your Kid's Scholarship?" TV slop that drives so many liberals insane. Nevermind the Zionists, those nice sweet liberal folks whose faces melt right off the moment you suggest butchering millions of brown people might be bad Middle East policy.

Fucking sucks, but time really does turn people rightward when you live in a fascist hellhole.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

that's not being a blank slate though, that's being so devoid of empathy that you can't even imagine what it's like being yourself a few years ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

People also become more isolated from “others” as they age, at least those with stable jobs. They are surrounded by people of the same financial ability, and their job keeps them in an area, and their income matches to a house.

It’s not until they get laid off or they have a medical event that they start to think about it again. As long as the life compared to their peers is ok and their bellies are full, they don’t complain about trillionaires.

We need to put LSD in the water supply

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A racialised socio-economic buffer in-between liberal elites and the underclasses was the whole point of the creation of the (so-called) "middle class" through Keynesian economics - that's really what the "New Deal" (in the US) and Apartheid-era economic policies in South Africa was all about. By giving a relatively small (and white) section of the working class a small taste of private property they'd become invested in the colonialist liberal economic order, and it was pretty successful too - it's the reason why boomers are the way they are.

However, now that Keynesian liberalism has inevitably degraded into neoliberalism (which is really an inevitable process) that pretend-social contract is essentially in tatters - so I guess all bets are off.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nitpick: the USA didn't adopt Keynesian monetary policy until after the Nixon Shock, as a post hoc rationale. Keynes helped destroy the middle class, not to create it.

[–] therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

That's true, but I'm not talking about monetary policy - I'm referring to post-WW2 state interventionism in the economy to prevent post-WW1-style revolutionary upheaval.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't help but wonder if that actually used to be true, but it was because of more accumulated lead exposure over time rather than aging over time.

I'm an old white guy born into conservative religious america, and my entire adult life has been spent sliding to the left as I observe the left being correct and giving a shit about people while the right continues to be disingenuous and destructive and greedy.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

I'm an old white guy born into conservative religious america, and my entire adult life has been spent sliding to the left as I observe the left being correct and giving a shit about people while the right continues to be disingenuous and destructive and greedy.

Same here and it's been a long road. I lived in Seattle for 5 years and it was just amazing not being surrounded by right wing religious zealots.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Maybe because they expected more of us would have wealth to protect? I always thought it was a stupid idea they told themselves to explain why their kids didn’t like them.

Personally, I’ve always been concerned about corrupt leaders coopting the inevitable wave of power coming to the millennials as the boomers faded away. I didn’t want to become like the previous generation, so I’ve paid extra attention to resisting being convinced to hate “out” groups. Only, the power never transitioned. Egg on my face, I guess.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Even as a child I knew the older generation was fucking everything up. I kept waiting for them to disappear but they never have...

It's only as I have grown older that I understand that these terrible people just get replaced with more and sometimes worse people...

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Hey you never know. It's probably a good idea for everyone to maintain vigilant like you do, just in case.

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What they actually mean is "You'll agree more when you're rich and complicit in benefiting from ever more unethical practices of people around you that you now have to make mental gymnastics about to make yourself still seem like a decent person". But that's a bit too long.

[–] LightDelaBlue@jlai.lu 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

more the time pass more i want make a guilottine factory.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

laudible but I always come back to wood chippers. Feed them in feet first. Cleanup and composting is easier too. On the other hand I do like that guillotines don't require gas to operate.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 8 points 4 days ago

What's worse is whoever posted this added 10.

18-39

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but how many of them supports actual socialism/communism rather that what they were told socialism/communism is?

it might be a similar situation to that with poles aged 40+ who were hurt by communism so they declare to support capitalism but when you actually ask them about capitalost ideas the support drops by a lot

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

But capitalism is essentially antihumane

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I looked at this and assume the person who authored the survey had worded it:

Which Do You Prefer?

  • Socialism

  • Communism

  • No Opinion

Specifically to create a troll graphic for FOX.

Btw, Cato Institute is a fucking Libertarian hothouse of business psychos and CSAM consumers. Take everything they put out with a grain of salt, even it's a surface level "Oh, that's good for us".

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. Cato Institute = Koch Brothers. Two of the most despicable libertarian oil pushing fuck nuts that spawned from hell here on earth.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Two of the most despicable libertarian oil pushing fuck nuts

Technically only one fucknut left from the original four. They Ayn Rand'd themselves sequentially and now the organization they run is mostly burning cash on vanity shit for libertarian baby-brains. But at its height, they were a terror.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Republicans literally giving away free tacos at the Texas Democratic Convention which... I guess... make you want to support Open Borders?

The menu included Veggie Talarico (potato, egg and cheese), N.I.C.E. (bacon, egg and cheese), Open Border Brisket (smoked brisket), and Democrat Promises, described on the menu as an "empty tortilla."

[–] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

Empty promises like... No new wars?

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

sigsauer1814

I refuse to believe this account's posts are genuine and not right-wing agitprop

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Sig Sauer is a firearms manufacturer. 18 = (1) Adolf (8) Hitler (count the letters) 14 are the fucked up " 14 words" from the shitbag neo-Nazi.

That mofo is a sack of shit neo-Nazi.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 21 points 4 days ago
[–] therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Stop treating people like dirt and you'll never have to worry about evil socialism (boo! hiss!) ever again... but, fortunately for the left, that is completely incomprehensible to anybody suffering from liberal brain-rot.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›