this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
305 points (100.0% liked)

PC Master Race

21702 readers
116 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Trebuchet@europe.pub 108 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There are other video players?

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 2 weeks ago

mpv is good too

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

Mpc-hc is a good alternative. It's a matter of preference

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nothing else exists besides VLC imo.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In my case this is literally true, because the IoT editions of Windows don't even come with a bundled media player (nor a bundled photo viewer other than classic Paint, for what it's worth).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Question: how does VLC get away with playing these proprietary codecs without compensating the owners of them?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

VLC relies on open source media decoding libraries and projects. Thanks to the mechanisms and math behind many video/audio encoding schemes being public knowledge due to whitepapers on the topics in question being available and so forth, these can be reverse engineered by dedicated nerds who are way better at this sort of thing than me. As long as you're not explicitly circumventing DRM there's nothing the owners of proprietary codecs can do to anyone making a compatible decoding library in a clean room fashion, especially as mentioned elsewhere nobody is charging any money in the process. You're licensing the code, not the method.

I imagine this is at least partially why the Jean-Baptiste Kempf is so adamantly against selling, monetizing, or allowing the VLC project to be bought out in any way whatsoever.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Could you imagine how much it would suck if VLC got bought out by corporate privateers?

Like the guy's been putting a lot of work in for a long time, so I couldn't exactly blame him for it, but we would need a fork immediately because otherwise that would just be too sad for words.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 9 points 2 weeks ago

mpv exists so if vlc dies there's just another reason to use linux.

Also dude has been approached and offered millions just for ad placement. I don't think he'll sell even if he's dying or homeless. It's a Terry Davis level of software development dedication at this point.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

videolan itself is a nonprofit, formed around the time of the 1.0 release of vlc.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think if it was bought it would be simply discontinued to force people to use their existing media player.

Also despite what people on tech forums think, probably 95% of people don't even know what VLC or 7zip are and have never even heard of it. Of that 5% that have heard of it, maybe half use it.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Does Microsoft not have anyone capable of reverse engineering these drivers too? Isn’t it in their best interest to also broaden compatibility?

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Can't charge a markup on Free.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Probably, if they wanted to. The historical writing is on the wall that they don't want to, though, as part of whatever their business strategy is. Fear of legal complications due to overtly being a for-profit commercial enterprise might also have something to do with it.

Microsoft is already quite infamous for e.g. going so far as to license third party .zip decompressing code to build into Windows Explorer rather than develop their own, code which apparently nobody in Redmond could be bothered to understand and thus to this very day the .zip archive handling capabilities of Explorer remain frozen and time from the XP era and so rinky-dink that they pale in comparison to commandline tools from the '90s. That's let alone compared to something like 7-Zip.

This also raises the issue of having to maintain said code over subsequent releases and continually update it to support evolving standards, etc., which not only isn't free but presents no obvious mechanism for extracting any revenue from anybody to offset that cost. The current plan of simply outsourcing the entire problem to its rightsholders and passing the licensing cost directly to the consumer allows Microsoft to handily wash their hands of the entire affair, enabling them to devote more resources to trying to shoehorn Copilot AI into the character map or the registry editor, or whatever the fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pipikia@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

What those drivers do is patented in the US. See MPEG licensing. VLC is based in the EU which does not have a mechanism for software patents that do not solve a physical problem (moving bits around isn't patentable there) so they can avoid issues. Microsoft, Corel, and Nero would not be able to do that, they have assets in the US, even if it would only be a bank account.

I would not be surprised if codec licensing would not allow shipping with old and open codecs like MJPEG, Theora and AV1 with an addon for the proprietary codecs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] exu@feditown.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

French law and European law don't have the concept of software patents, so there's no basis to sue VLC.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Short answer: many have no licensing requirements for playback, only encoding. Sales are easy when you have a good codec that everyone can watch.

[–] alanjaow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe it's because they're not selling their product? I don't know though, just guessing.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 53 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't you just use VLC?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Copyright ©2002-2026.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Man it's been like 15 years since I last watched that...

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 47 points 2 weeks ago

Good thing RAM is cheap and abundant, right?

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Windows Media Player CodecPass Ultimate Series X 360 Enshittified™ Edition with Copilot AI

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Featuring Dante from Devil May Cry

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Now with 200% more Onedrive subscription!

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I do continually find it baffling that companies repeatedly replace existing products with something worse

I literally can't think of one time some service or software was retired in lieu of a like for like* replacement and it wasn't actually worse for a very long time.

I'm actually struggling to think of any example actually

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You could maybe make an argument for Counter Strike or Team Fortress or something like that… maybe.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

aren't current iterations of both basically 'live service games' now, with microtransactions driving their continued existence?

they are not the same games as the hl mods i started playing way before steam came along.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's worse for the end user, but better for shareholders.

The best software in many categories is open source and it's astonishing how few people use it. I mainly blame governments in the 1990s and early 00s for embedding Microsoft into their own systems, administrations and most of all: schools. We could be living in a much nicer world right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 18 points 2 weeks ago

Omg they’re trying to destroy Microsoft from the inside.

They’re the good guys everyone, it’s an inside job! ~(つˆ0ˆ)つ。☆

[–] Skkorm@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Laughs in Linux

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I use Media Player Classic Home Theater. It is free, and is still maintained.

CLSID2 - MPC: HC

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh so it is! I didn't know there was an active fork, I stopped using it when the original repo was archived.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

malware infested 'codec packs' about to make a comeback.

[–] nevetsg@aussie.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Everyone saying "why not use VLC?" Because I have never liked its interface. MPC BE though... That is my jam.

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some people like eating crayons and that's okay

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which ones are the crayon eaters though?

[–] TheStrongestBoy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

The ones paying to watch video formats without a doubt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Ehmmmm.... Vlc?

[–] Narann@jlai.lu 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Windows is the new Winrar.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

WinRAR said it had a 40 day trial, but it actually never expired and you could continue using it forever for free. You never had to pay.

Which is why we have all the WinRAR memes.

Due to this, it was actually pretty goated, and remembered fondly by many.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

I honestly would buy a $300 copy of Windows Enterprise, provided it didn't have adware and other invasive things. Unfortunately, the last time I bought a premium Windows was back when Windows 7 Ultimate roamed the world.

These days, I just pirate a copy of Enterprise via RUFUS, and use ShutUp10 to kill whatever nastiness that Microsoft is up to. That sucks. I want to just buy a perfect Windows and get on with my day.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It now uses under 400mb memory.

Licensed codecs aren’t free, which isn’t new.

This isn’t significant.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah did it ever natively play h265? You’ve always had to pay the $2 for it, had an OEM computer that they paid for it, or gotten it from something else. It was the exact same in windows 10.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›