this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
979 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

11971 readers
2208 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@piefed.ca 172 points 4 days ago (5 children)

a failure so spectacular, it lead to fdr, the new deal..... republicans wouldn't win the white house back until 1952.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 108 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And only 6 years after they finally got the Whitehouse again, they started plotting for the next massive fuck up era by founding the John Birch Society (which is a major cause for the GOP's current psychosis.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

that wasn't ike, though. those nutcases thought he was a commie.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I agree. As conservatives go Ike was pretty reasonable.

My point was that almost as soon as the party got the Whitehouse again, influential portions of it started to plot for the next Great Depression like catastrophy.

As an ideological movement, they've proved many times that they cannot be trusted with power.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

The rich people made a lot of money from the last Great Depression, I bet that's what they're hoping for again.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Don't forget about the McCarthyism of the late 40s and the 50s. Ronald Reagan was involved with that particular movement since the beginning when he testified in front of Congress (specifically the House Un-American Activities Committee) saying that communists were taking over Hollywood.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (4 children)

fingers crossed history repeats itself lol

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I don't want another world war, or Jim Crow...

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think we're already in the middle of both of those.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but the Democrats were competent back then. I don't have confidence in most of the modern Democrats. There are only like 3 of them who seem to get what's going on

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Allowing presidents to pick your justices and then giving them jobs for life is the stupidest system ever created. Ripe for abuse.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

What so bizarre is SCOTUS has always been conservative. We get a couple of judges who are not hardcore conservatives and they help make a couple of rulings that aren't just one sided conservative nonsense and suddenly "they are taking over the judiciary with activist judges".

So the conservatives do exactly this, they start stacking their already suck ass conservative courts that always rule for big business with even more extreme ideological fucktards. Every accusation is a confession I suppose.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

They have to get approved by our Congress too it's just that they're also not doing their jobs well.

[–] jenings@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Tankies will continue to say both sides same

Tankies really follow the will of the despots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 82 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In their view the Great Depression was probably started by a bunch of lazy woke activists who didn't want to work, thus spurring the dust bowl with their uh, inaction. Dust everywhere. No one dusting.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 days ago

They should sweep the forests, like they do in sweden

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Also the law that froze the number of house seats (and this number of electrical college votes), screwing everything up and allowing both Bush and the pedo to "win" was passed in 1929.

It should be triple by now.

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 76 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's what Republican's do best; fuck up the economy.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago

Conservatives are – and have always been – the enemy of the people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The Trump depression is going to make 2008 look like a picnic.

[–] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But I'm already very depressed!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In response to 2008 we didn't actually fix anything, bail outs just postpone the inevitable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

They have all this control but the only box these guys have ticked is removing some brown people from the country (who they are very likely never crossed paths with). Everything else is getting shitter for them, so what's to celebrate?

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There will be inflation and you will love it.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Great Depression featured deflation, for whatever the hell that's worth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)
  • Massive amounts of what effectively amounts to gambling on the stock market.
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Luckily, we have nothing like that today.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We have an extremely stable, rational market where share prices are based solely on tangible business value and not at all artificially inflated due to completely unrealistic goals and investor greed.

...I'm sorry. I can't even type this with a straight face.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There is higher than 0% chance that DJT won't reach a deal with Iran "Soon", the possibility of oil crisis and economic recession are still very real.

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want the price of gas to be $25 dollars per gallon

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

$25 a gallon will cause a severe economic recession. I'm not sure I want a third "one in a lifetime recession"

That’s the point, it’s a small price to pay to get rid of orange man

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know, $25 dollars a gallon isn’t enough, make it $35 dollars a gallon

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right now, prices and availability are being kept semi stable by draw downs on strategic reserves, but that won’t last forever.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Hell, it probably won’t last another month.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 days ago

Definitely not the flex they think it is.

[–] garbagehead@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Remember when the Dems controlled all three bodies and for all that non stop hysterial talk about gun control what happened?.....crickets ..... no change. Why would anyone expect change from either side is always my question.

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Sorry when was this that dems had filibuster proof control of house, senate and presidency for a while?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

They don't know a lot of things

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Knowing what happened in 1929 would require reading and thinking…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Somehow screwworm has returned

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Hey, at least this time the republicans aren’t jerking off to nonsense tariffs, right?

[–] Mordred_85@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Roaring 30s

[–] red_tomato@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Make depression great again!

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

That was before the Southern Strategy

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 10 points 4 days ago

ah yes, party like its the most recent '28. with a beer.

which was illegal at the time.

some kind of dog whistle?

load more comments
view more: next ›