Dryad

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Anecdotally, I’d say money and the world would be the two big things.

People don’t have enough money to raise kids. Americans can’t afford to give birth with hospital bills. Childcare is expensive, but the alternative is no income. People can’t accumulate generational wealth, so there’s nothing to pass on, therefore no need for anyone to pass it to.

Environmental anxiety is real. Why bring kids into a world that’s about to burn?

Maybe one last factor is rebellion. A small sample I feel like chooses not to have kids so as not to perpetuate the system. The billionaires can’t exploit my kids if I don’t have any.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The rich are universally rich entirely by continually choosing to ignore the plight of the poor and slinging bootstrap condemnations. No identity sustained by evil choosing can be equated with racism.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

The rich are universally rich entirely by continually choosing to ignore the plight of the poor and slinging bootstrap condemnations. No identity sustained by evil choosing can be equated with racism.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It’ll be total control almost as fast as his total control over Iran.

What’s the clear and present danger for this one again?

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Capitalism, corporate greed, and oil cartels.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

What could possibly go wrong with this short-sighted, privacy-invasive attempt at “safety”?

My bet is there’s a required subscription fee for it too.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

There are plenty of things God “might have done,” But this sort of thing is neither scientific nor scriptural.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

But AI, at this point and for the foreseeable future, is not a thinking machine. It’s a probability machine. It can do some neat tricks and some helpful things, but it is not thinking.

I would also posit that AI is in many ways less useful than tech that came before it. Computers largely augment what people had been doing on paper for centuries before, just faster, more consistently, easier. AI promises to outsource thinking, which isn’t augmenting something people already do (or at least should do). But at this point, it fails to do even that.