this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
863 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck AI

7403 readers
957 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 141 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Sadly I have generally watched in horror as my friends quote Gemini slop as fact checking on the regular, because it's the default search result.

I speak up about it, and explain why it's problematic. Doesn't matter. It's convenient.

Convenience always wins.

We're cooked.

[–] karashta@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know people that will complain about the crappy results but then not use a different search engine. Like it's too much cognitive load to go to duckduckgo or qwant or whatever

[–] Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

To be fair, duck duck go also has some garbage results compared to like 2015 google. I have used ddg for the past several years and many topics yield terrible results. I was "the good googler" amongst my peers at the time. I haven't tried qwant, so it might be better. A lot of search engines are worse and I'm guessing it's partially because the web is just bloated with trash now.

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I downloaded the Wikipedia app - I usually end up there anyway, just now I just cut to the chase.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nah, they're cooked. Only ones going against this stupid machine worship are those who actually touch grass.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 week ago

Where do you think grok gets the info?

Mein Kampf.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And hence why we call it "métrage" in French, as in "un long métrage" (a feature film) and "un court métrage" (a short film) ; because we measure in metres !

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Full movie, largometraje Short film, cortometraje

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I thought it got it from Elon Musk. That's why it's stupid as fuck. 🤷‍♂️

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 8 points 1 week ago

I never really used A.I at all. I remember the very first wave of midjurney i think, and i found it fascinating, made a few pictyres and was like woah, cool. Never touched it again. Tge other day i wanted to make an STL file but i didn't really feel like learnic CAD, so i thought: A.I is supposed to be supper smart and can create images and code and shit, right? I sat down and told it what i need and it started creating something. It looked nice and all, but missed the mark. I exoplained what was wrong and it made something else. Most of the time it ran in circles and said: oh i get it, and made the same thing again. It made things that weren't connected. Sometimes it made sometging that was close and when i told it what to change it made sometging else entirely that was all kinds of wrong. After a while it wasn't even about tge thing anymore, i juat wanted to figure out why it can't do it. At the end i sat on my couch for like 3 hours and it was nothing. I do not understand how prople claim that A.I is so smart, it was one of the most frustrating thimgs that i have done in a long time. It was like explaining somethimg to someone who clearly doesn't get it, and you just do it yourself at the end.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Merriam-Webster is a source of factual information. Factual information is woke or something. Elon doesn't allow grok to consider anything woke in its answers. Therefore grok doesn't get the info from Merriam-Webster.

[–] Nautalax@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When I was a kid I thought “talkie” was such a ridiculous, funny-sounding word for the advent of films with sound. It was only years later that I realized that the word “movie” which I had never thought twice about was almost the exact same thought process for, you know, pictures that moved.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Enter all the cineasts that sighs and says "Films, not movies"

[–] yeah@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BlindPenguin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

*English (simplified) /s

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 23 points 1 week ago

ROFL I always wonder if we are totally cooked as a society, if the billionaires are going to get what they want. Sometimes, I think so. However, there are enough people that thing LLMs are total bullshit and won't be lured in. Good on Merriam-Webster to clap back on grok induced stupidity!

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 21 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Is there a term for people who only get answers from Ai?

Like some AI cuck?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago

I've seen cogsuckers used before.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

“Most people” is the term you’re looking for. You could also call them “normies”.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] schema@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I like it. Reminds me of Red Dwarf

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago
[–] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Dumbass Cogsuckers

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, those people with brAIns

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Slop zombie.

I just made that one up

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As long as they use an uncensored AI trained with the least biased data, that would be a billion times better than facebook poster or Instagram, TikTok, Twitter

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

What a terribly low bar to set

[–] BOplaid@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

True

But FB IG TikTok Twitter aren't exactly good

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@grok how do i wipe my ass after poop?

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

GROK: Go waterskiing naked & sitting down, only do it on a road with a car.

USER: Sounds fun, thx!

[–] TacticalToothbrush@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have "Schadenfreude". We're gonna need a word for physical pain caused by witnessing such stupidity.

[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] homik@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_embarrassment

I was pointed to that by looking up myötähäpeä.

Is death by facepalm a thing?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

If you're lucky, this is where it gets its info.

[–] CorvusCornix@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

To be fair, I wouldn't expect grok to be using actual facts and reputable sources as its baseline knowledge, given its owner.

So the only explanation here, is that they thought Merriam Webster is a person not an Encyclopedia, right?

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Either dumb or deliberately summoning fucking Grok just for the lulz.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

@gork is this real??2?

[–] x264@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

@grok explain this I lack braincells

load more comments
view more: next ›