this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
1241 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

85602 readers
3698 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 234 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arrandee@lemmy.world 154 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

She’s gonna get a share of the lease revenue on that, right?

…right?

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 172 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Even if they didn't do her dirty, she wouldn't. She donated it to the city and relinquished ownership of it. The expectation, even written into the deed, was that the land was to be used as a park, but they turned around and sold it multiple times. Despite the stipulation in the original deed to the parks and recreation department, the data center is still going forward.

The story is just such a tragedy all around.

[–] Arrandee@lemmy.world 115 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Huh, I’m not an attorney but that sure seems actionable if the intended use was documented in a contract.

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 148 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

She's got an attorney and they're trying to stop it based on that, but it just seems like everyone involved (edit: besides her) just doesn't give a fuck.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 112 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They've been taught that if they ignore the law and do whatever they want to they don't get punched in the face.

That will only go on for so long but it's going to suck until someone gets punchy.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Especially with the recent East Wing argument, the lesson is "if you do it fast enough and ignore other people getting angry about it, you can do whatever you want."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

gimme some wiskey and point them out, I get punchy, 1 shot or 20

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fratermus@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The relevant case law may be found in Molotov vs. New Construction .

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cogman@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago (6 children)

One of the more fucked up aspects of eminent domain. City/county/state governments can nuke deeds by using eminent domain. It allows them to turn a plot of land, regardless prior restrictions, into things like dumps.

The fucked up part about it is they can also turn public lands into private lands with that same trick.

What's frustrating is we still need eminent domain for good. It's basically the only way to build railways and roads. It even ends up being one of the few ways to deploy things like district heating/cooling and new fiber lines.

[–] Yosmonkol@piefed.social 33 points 1 week ago

Eminent domain didn't factor into this particular case. The Taylor Economic Development Corporation simply ignored the deed and sold the land to BPP Projects LLC/Blueprint while Taylor City Council and Judge Ryan Larson approved and upheld it respectively.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe eminent domain should have a very limited scope legally and should mostly only be used for public infrastructure projects and housing honestly…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 77 points 1 week ago (4 children)

AI is starting to show that it isn't worth the investment and they are STILL building more?!? WTF is going on?

[–] fenrasulfr@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Because I do not think AI is the actual end goal. I think the actual end goal is cloud computing. They want everyone to use thin clients and connect to their data center instead of using a pc at home.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

The bailout money will be double what they lost I am guessing.

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 56 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It should be legal and acceptable to take back things given for one purpose that end up being used for something else.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

It actually is if the gift is conditional on a specified use - in writing of course.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brem@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was curious where the land was, and if I could help in any way.

It's in Texas. I made a promise to myself that I'd never go back to Texas.

Texas. Fucking. Suuuuuucks.

[–] violentfart@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

“Don’t mess with Texas” now has a different meaning.

[–] el_muerte@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

"Don't mess with Texas, it might be contagious"

[–] brem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Just like "Everything Is Bigger In Texas" is considered a self-own to the rest of the world, they're the brunt of the joke. (Sorry Austin, you too. Yes, even SXSW)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

People should know that donating land like this is not at all guaranteed to keep the land from being developed. Promises to keep parks in existence is nothing when the city "needs" a new development, hospital, data center, whatever.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know the saying is "don't mess with Texas" but Texas seems to fuck itself over all the time. I would be raising hell about this if it was my backyard.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

That's kind of but not exactly a mistranslation. The original Chinese is closer to 'do not interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake', but in the american vernacular, you can just say 'don't mess with Texas' and it means the same thing locally. Its one of those very regional sayings.

[–] calebm@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure "Don't mess with Texas" began its life as an anti-littering campaign in the late 80s or early 90s. It has been appropriated to mean all sorts of things, though. The original meaning might be even more relevant to data centers...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

a while back when i was a animal physio class a university, the profess told how he knew someone about to retire/Will but he wanted to donate it to STANFORD on the sole purpose of it being used as a research station in some island/country. the guy somehow heard the stanford lawyers said they were going to sell it or rent it out instead right behind his back. he gave it to Berkley university instead to be used for science.

the moral of the story make sure you have something in place so that the land/property being donated is used properly by a lawyer or a trust org.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Universities are a business and have the morals of your generic street thug. Why anyone would consider donating anything to them is a mystery.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

And this is why you need a lawyer when you're doing this kind of thing.

If this farmer was smart, there would be a clause in the contract that the land may only be used for a park or other public space. And that if the city decides to resell the land, the farmer or their descendants will have the right to reclaim it.

Thus, farmer could either stop the data center or at least get a solid payday.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you read the article, there was exactly this sort of clause in the deed, and now the courts are saying “fuck you”

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

and now the courts are saying “fuck you”

It's one Court and unsurprisingly it's the Court located right there in town. I strongly suspect that the Third Court of Appeals is going to have a different take on this mess.

At least where I live you can't wash away a deed restriction like this by transferring the property a couple times.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

was there a clause that if it isnt used as intended, it return to the owner?

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pave paradise and put up a ~~parking lot~~ data center

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ptc075@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Stories like this always remind me of the Peter's parking deck at GA Tech. The couple that donated the land wanted it to be a park, so that the students would have a green place to play and relax. Once Tech had the land, they put a parking deck there instead. But they put a basketball court on the top level so that they technically met the letter of the law.

In fairness, as a student I needed that parking deck way more than I needed the park.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 week ago

I can't imagine a better way to ensure people don't donate land ever again.

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's a park... An industrial park

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago
[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I’m curious what would be the better approach if someone wanted to donate land to be used for a park? Give it to a charity? Or somehow find the cash and just build the park yourself and let people visit your land?

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My town had a guy that loved baseball a long time ago, he had money and wanted it local so he built a baseball field right on the river, made a big park and donated it to the city. He was pretty smart about it and worked the deed so that it would take a two-third vote of the citizens to sell it.

Fast forward to a couple of years ago and the mayor petitioned the governor to change the deed under an NDA as he wanted to lease the park to a minor league baseball team. In the deal he also gave them the naming rights for the park, so the baseball team renamed the park after a local bank that gave them money.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, you really can’t control your legacy, huh?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

404 Media is journalist-founded and supported by reader subscriptions. They are four high quality investigators doing amazing work (they work with a couple of other people on some stories).

If you can't afford it, I understand. I share archive links all the time. For anyone with a few extra bucks who cares about quality reporting by people with integrity, this is easily one of the best options around. I've been extremely happy knowing they exist. (Gets you extra content from their podcast, too.)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›