this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
1215 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

85274 readers
4160 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I’m curious what would be the better approach if someone wanted to donate land to be used for a park? Give it to a charity? Or somehow find the cash and just build the park yourself and let people visit your land?

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My town had a guy that loved baseball a long time ago, he had money and wanted it local so he built a baseball field right on the river, made a big park and donated it to the city. He was pretty smart about it and worked the deed so that it would take a two-third vote of the citizens to sell it.

Fast forward to a couple of years ago and the mayor petitioned the governor to change the deed under an NDA as he wanted to lease the park to a minor league baseball team. In the deal he also gave them the naming rights for the park, so the baseball team renamed the park after a local bank that gave them money.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn, you really can’t control your legacy, huh?

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It would be easier if you weren't dead

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Depends how it was dontated, you can specify a loan of the land indefinetly to the city as long as its use is xyz.

If its a straight donation with no caveats attached then the city can do what it wants

My local council tried to build on some park land donated 100 years ago but the donator had specified its usage in the donation so they got shut down pretty hard.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately it seems like the donator specified the usage in this case as well, but the courts are straight up ignoring it.

On July 7, 1999, Bland’s descendants granted 87.97 acres of land to the “Texas Parks and Recreation Foundation, a Texas non-profit corporation, to be held in trust for future use as parkland by Williamson County, Texas,” according to a copy of the deed reviewed by 404 Media.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Keep the land. Build on it that park you have in mind. A donation means you give away any control.

[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

tax benefits to donations, as opposed to maintaining it

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

For a financial benefit, a sale beats a donation.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sell a part of your land and use the money to build a park on the rest.