can't wait for timeshift to delete my entire harddrive
Fuck AI
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
OpenBSD forked it a while ago as “openrsync”. It’s already the default on macOS.
Nice!
https://github.com/kristapsdz/openrsync
This is an implementation of rsync with a BSD (ISC) license. It's compatible with a modern rsync (3.1.3 is used for testing, but any supporting protocol 27 will do), but accepts only a subset of rsync's command-line arguments.
But also:
The actual work of porting is matching the security features provided by OpenBSD's pledge(2) and unveil(2). These are critical elements to the functionality of the system. Without them, your system accepts arbitrary data from the public network.
rsync has specific running modes for the super-user. It also pumps arbitrary data from the network onto your file-system. openrsync is about 10 000 lines of C code: do you trust me not to make mistakes?
Did they really need AI to set a number to 45?!? Also you can do this centrally in the repo settings and don't need to do it on every single workflow!
Conclusion: Garbage code
lol - I don't use any AI code in projects I'm paid for at all, but I experiment in my free time. One of the few advantages is that I can keep going when I'm completely braindead, like before first coffee or when I should have gone to bed 3 hours ago. So I prompt things like "run those test thingies" when I can't even remember the gradle/maven task that I use 50 times per week.
So yes, for me, strangely relatable :-)
This is what AI does...it "removes the friction" of doing large scale find and replace operations consistently so your whole repository becomes terrible, repetitive patterns because it made it much easier to do the wrong thing.
My question is if that number is set/used separately in all those places why isn't it defined somewhere more centrally. It's silly that you need to update so many files for such a simple change.
I once worked with a dude that basically maintained what would've been a database in a reasonable code base through a series of data structures hard-coded into the Java code. When there were changes, he would roll through the dozens of files and add additional records into the code. AI has probably made his "job" a snap...if he still has one.

Well... That's one way to ask the community to take-over maintenance.
They're not asking.
Since a senior engineer is clearly in the loop here I wouldn't pass judgement on these commits without looking at their actual content. LLMs can be used responsibly, too.
There are reported bugs https://mastodon.gamedev.place/@JeremiahFieldhaven/116654345332213390
The thing is, LLM can theoretically used be responsibly, just like heroin can be used in a way that doesn't cause crippling addiction. But nobody does that, and that's kind of the problem.
Yeah the role of the maintainer is to gatekeep the quality of the finished product. As long as they do that it's fine. The contributor could be a clanker or a junior trying to get their first PR, I don't care cause the person I trust is the maintainer.
Rsync's creator has been maintaining load bearing infra since before I learned to code, if you can't trust them who can you trust?
Fuck all clankers.
There was also a little debacle a while ago that VS Code was misattributing everything committed in git by users with its default CoPilot extension as being co-written by CoPilot.
Something like that could also be happening here.
I wonder if I still have any of those Linux CDs I burned years ago
Saw a post somewhere else on it but my instance can't load it now for some reason.
Anyways, here's the Discord dump for those who don't want to join (Tor not allowed, sorry I don't have a better file host, AI brought down 0x0.st). No further commentary.
While you criticize someone for just accepting things, you didn't check if that is actually the case?
If its bad code then you can audit it and claim those bug bounties. Its a well known project with a lot of eyes on it I think the quality will remain high.
lot of eyes on it I think the quality will remain high
This was bullshit when Raymond argued it in the 90s and it's even more bullshit now.
it is bullshit because there are no "lot of eyes" on the project. not because the statement is wrong!
Use the last non vibe coded version