this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
755 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

85016 readers
2174 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Regretful cities aren't sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is an better idea. I was going to shoot them with a paintball gun.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

iirc, paintball marker is slightly translucent, right? So maybe like...a sticker?

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Some of the cameras by me are a little high up, which is why initially I thought paintball.

I bet I could fly a drone with a trash bag over it though.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

One of those spray-can extension poles would probably work pretty well.

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

My neighbor used to put marbles in his paintball gun

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Must have been a scary ghost that disabled those spy cameras.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Why aren't they just... Removing them?

Oh. Its probably because removing them is unnecessarily complicated so they need the company to come do it for them.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You don't have to worry about a complicated removal if you have an angle grinder.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

You'd be surprised how few worries I have when I'm brandishing an angle grinder

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you had read the article you'd know that the cities aren't sure if they can remove them under the terms of their contracts with flock. So they're covering them while working that out.

I'm pretty sure one city did remove them and then Flock just came and put new ones up which is what lead to the trash bags.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 175 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I 100% guarantee that "deactivated" cameras are still operational. It's just not the City getting the data.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They don't just collect video either. Audio, network traffic, Bluetooth devices, tons of electronic intelligence can still be gotten with covered cameras

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

seems like they should use those metallic ballon type bags.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Heard lots of precious metals in them, wink wink, nudge, nudge, and all that then LoL

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do also the other thing, where you brake it apart. Same thing, but it's permanently.

[–] vapordays@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago

Or accelerate it apart

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I read the beginning of the title as "Cities are Cowering" and now I think it could easily be a part of an alternate title.

Like your the damn government... Just remove the devices, tell Flock where they can pick them up in the next two weeks otherwise they will be sold as is on open market and pay the termination fee or potential lawsuit. Cities get sued like all the time and I am confident even a moderately competent lawyer could find a cheap way out.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Article reminded me that some people say "by accident" (me) and some say "on accident" (my cousins).

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Thats a journalist though. They should know better.

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 103 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Fun fact the panel, inverter, and battery set up in these do not have any tracking features, that's all in the internals for the camera controller. It's enough to charge any smart phone or tablet if someone you know is living outside and should have a need of that. You do not need anything more than a Philips head screwdriver for most versions, and a security bit for others, both of which you can have for pennies at any hardware store.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago

Some flock stuff has microphones so avoid talking during the maintenance session 😜

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I'm surprised Dayton is doing even that. It's a low bar, sure, but it's also Dayton.

[–] NehpetsDoom@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trash bags just do that sometimes...

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Getting the plastic bag scene from American Beauty vibes.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Just read the headline. Good

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Makes them more easily identifiable so they can be properly disposed of.

[–] GioGioMioGio@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

I guess technically they already are in a trashbag.

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can 100% remove them with a baseball bat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] addie@feddit.uk 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd like to think that the bag is step 1. Step 2 is to balance an old car tire on top, and set it on fire.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I love the theatrics of it, but surely something less polluting can achieve the same results

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Guillotines?

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  1. City installs trash bags because they're contractually obligated to keep the devices installed and powered on
  2. Someone hosts an impromptu Office Space fan meetup, with a fun reenactment of the printer scene
  3. City sees this, responds with an obvious but legally non-actionable tweet response suggesting it continue (e.g. "Fartsburg loves Mike Judge films, too! So nice to see our citizens enjoying the various forms of recreation and socialization ths city has to offer."), along with some conspicuously-placed garbage cans near all of the cameras' installed locations.
  4. ???
  5. (No) Profit. (for Flock)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the city was sharing Flock camera data for immigration enforcement

Ah, these are in American cities.

apparently on accident,

Oh yes, definitely American.

(Yes I know I skipped over the part about Ohio)

load more comments (1 replies)

This is why you don't sign contracts without an obvious out.

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 days ago (3 children)

One step away from being relocated to their actual destination: the bin.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›