this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
64 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

42994 readers
196 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zoop@beehaw.org 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is a great post about such a frustrating and sucky situation. Thank you for sharing it with us here. I really feel for all the smaller sites and webmasters who have to deal with all this absurdity. :(

Like they mentioned, when I hit one of those damn Cloudflare 'prove you're a human' checks -- which is a LOT nowadays -- I definitely do get irritated...but I'm not usually upset with the site owner who is just trying to protect their site. I feel for them. I'm pissed off and disgusted at all the greedy, inconsiderate assholes and corporations who are fucking everything up for us normal people, both on the Internet and off.

I don't know where we go from here, but I hope it somehow gets better soon... ugh.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

And so the Tragedy of the Commons plays out, yet again.

There's no cost to being a selfish asshole, so it's sadly not surprising that many individual actors are destroying the public Internet. Like, how can we align incentives to stop this? Regulations/laws are mostly pointless since the very same tactics used to dodge bot detection also make it incredibly hard to identify the originator.

The only other disincentive with a real cost, that I can think of, would be to poison the data fed to scrapers, so they get bad data? That seems expensive to set up, though.

I think TFA has the best solution idea: make it easy to scrape all the useful data using a low-cost standardized system. Then there's no incentive to scrape the website using a stupid, expensive crawler in the first place.

Edit: actually, LLMs make poisoning the data fairly reasonable... When there's a high volume of requests for outdated pages/edit pages/other rarely accessed pages, have the server serve a pre-cached parody version of the root page instead. Pre-build one parody copy of each page with a standardized prompt, like "rewrite this page like it comes from an academic journal of medicine or economics with APA citations for every fact."

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And fediverse sites. Have to update blockers every month or so

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Why not require a login to browse?

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Wouldn't help..

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

People started allowing scrapers because they needed to get in the search engine indexes to get traffic. But getting scraped being a win-win for the scraper and scrapee is long past. Now it's completely parasitic. The search engines are even going out of their way to not send traffic to organic results.

I wonder if it's time to start to create an un-indexable "shadow internet." Block all scraping even the search engines. Maybe put up login walls. How will people find your website? We'll have to go back to word of mouth, link rings, or the like.

[–] OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that you can't block all scraping. The scrapers make their bots look like regular traffic, so even if you block all known scrapers, there will be tons that just look like humans visiting your site.

[–] delmain@beehaw.org 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Collaborative list of basic IP blocks of known scraper hosts.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] hazelnoot@beehaw.org 2 points 14 hours ago

IP addresses can't really be spoofed, but there are other issues that make IP-based filtering impractical. (VPNs, IPv6, malicious reporting, shared IPs, NAT, etc)

changing IPs is very easy.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I didnt see this mentioned- for all the old non-cashed stuff, would it help to throttle it by like 5-10 seconds per request? Maybe also serve a cached “loading” page during the wait.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 1 points 15 hours ago

What we need is a system that detects scrapers, and feeds them an alternative poisoned data set.