50 posts a day!? If you hit 50 posts a day they should just ban you.
this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
157 points (95.9% liked)
Technology
85110 readers
4421 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The point is to make bot farms create thousands of new accounts, driving up user accounts so they can trick investors and advertisers into thinking they still have a viable business.
Don't a lot of people cover live events, city hearings, court room proceedings, war zones, etc?
No id say the vast majority of people do not do those things.
"a lot" ≠ most
This is enshitification, but it might be indirectly helping people who are on Twitter too much 😄
It doesn't do much to bot farms since they can keep spinning up more accounts
I would argue you cannot enshitify a service that was already shit. At this point this is more of a conshitidation.
Enshittification doesn't mean "making a good system bad". It's a specific process whereby the user experience of a platform is degraded in order to benefit the business partners. Then even the business partners are ripped off to benefit the platform owners.
If you want to get picky, Xwitter didn't enshitify as laid out as a concept by Cory Doctorow. The best example is probably Amazon which went from being insanely user friendly to lock in users, to supplier-friendly and increasingly less so for users, until it had squeezed and shafted both groups. That's enshitification and it doesn't apply to Xwitter. They had problems to make money before a certain somebody bought it. They've been bleeding users since the eventually Nazi saluting manbaby bought it, who then wanted to sue advertisers who refused to buy ads on his service. There was no user lock-in and then a supplier lock-in. There was just shit. All their current problems are man made. By one specific man.
Just because it is caused by one man doesn't mean it isn't entshittification.
Yeah but it isn't here.
I never thought I'd like using a word more than enshittification, but conshitidation takes the cake, I think.
If these restrictions are significant, please seek therapy
I guess it's for customer care
Why the fuck do people still use Twitter? Why would you pay to use social media? You're already the product, and now you're going to pay to be the fucking product? Are you stupid?
Have you met people lately?
Yes I have. It was not good.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Does anyone actually reach those numbers? Is this a crackdown on bots?
Most people won't hit those numbers, and this that so should probably be paying for the service
this is what it really is. this seems very normal but its happening on a service owned by a shitty person so people make a big deal. this isnt enshiyification, as another commenter said because it doesnt affect a normal user.
Its so hard for me to believe that there are people out there for whom this will be an issue. Who are these people and what's wrong with them?
My thoughts also... who the hell posts more than 50 times a day... well that's twitter isn't probably paid for with our tax dollars anyway.
Pretty much anyone whose username ends in .eth or begins with a dollar sign or has a crypto address in their bio, but the vast majority of those people already pay for that blue checkmark anyway
Twitter being paid for with our tax dollars is the first explanation I've heard which sounds like a way this company could actually continue to function.
I consider myself quite active on Lemmy yet I still only average 12 comments and half a post per day. For all I know, Lemmy could have these same limits and I'd never even find out about it.
Twits. It's a social class and a diagnosis.
Oh, man, this will affect tens of people.
Oh no! The nazi bar has set a drink limit! Guess I'll just have to continue not drinking there.
Oh, no!
Anyway...
Mastodon doesn't have these limits.
That means I'll end each day having only 50 posts remaining...
Even when I had an account years ago there was not a single day I posted/replied/commented/shared more than 1-3 times a day (1-3 interactions a day)
It was never my thing really so it was easy to remove from my life.
Who cares. Piece of shit platform.
Since 2007 or so, I haven't seen a good use case for Xitter other than situations where mass messaging is necessary. Like a utility company announcing maintenance or outages. Why do people care so much about what other people think?
My dear mother taught me that opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one and they all stink.
Wise woman.
this saying doesnt apply universally, what about people into butt stuff that regularly bleach their assholes you tear into that after a good bleaching/shower (and enema, if you want to be safe), it's fine
The upside of Twitter's downfall has been the absence of "look what so and so said in a tweet" headlines.
This is great! We need more enshittification on X!
Let me get this straight.....
Elon musk buys twitter for 44 BILLION dollars with the expectation that it will help be influencial towards societies general conversation.
So then he starts turning twitter into a right wing cesspool, and some users start leaving. Granted, not nearly enough. I think I read about 30% of the site has left, but thats still far too many who haven't left.
So despite his stupidity, he still has a sizeable platform. And his thought process is......"hey, you know those influencial voices we have on society? Lets limit those!"
So now they are reducing the amount of messages their users can put out into the world.
..........so what is even the goal here? Are they just doing things to stay in the news?
I'd like to know how many of that 70% left are dead accounts.
......at least 1.
It's because he's an idiot.
Gotta extract more value from the reduced user base. Think Netflix. Plus, they gotta recoup AI “investment” costs, and the remaining people on Xitter are predominantly mouth breathing rubes.
Add that to foresight only as far as the next quarter and it’s the most logical recipe for success /s
But the bots will be less effective. I bet the API charges are going up soon.
I'm happy to say that the only time I've ever even been on twitter was to check down times on destiny 2 servers which at the time was literally the only place they'd post stuff like that... Nobody knows why... But then again it's bungie... So...
How could anyone limit themselves to 50 posts on apartheid-fan-boi.facist?
Good, will make people get off Xwitter.
view more: next ›