this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
202 points (97.6% liked)

News

36000 readers
3027 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump has proposed major changes to the U.S. education system, including eliminating the Department of Education to give states more control.

His Agenda47 plan also aims to restrict school content on topics like race, gender, and sexuality, dismantle diversity initiatives, and promote “patriotic values” through teacher certification and curriculum changes.

Trump supports universal school choice, allowing public funds for private education, and seeks to end teacher tenure, replacing it with merit-based pay.

For higher education, he proposes creating a free “American Academy” funded by taxing private universities.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (6 children)

His Agenda47 plan also aims to restrict school content on topics like race, gender, and sexuality, dismantle diversity initiatives, and promote “patriotic values” through teacher certification and curriculum changes.

How exactly is this all going to be done without a Department of Education? One paragraph says give states more control and the next one says control the curriculum.

States' Rights only matter when Republicans agree with them.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

The Truth in Learning and Jesus is lord department of proper thought.

For a quick idea of the coming total control of morality^‡^ across all society, learn about the 7 mountain mandate (7mm)

^‡ does not apply to deities, god kings, or any member of the ruling faction amd their enforcers^

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You forget, he has an idea of a plan

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I was sure that him whining that at the debate would be the final nail in his political coffin. I'm so disappointed in my fellow Americans.

[–] thomas@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Education enforcement to be done by the police officers who currently sit at desks at the front of the school looking bored?

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Republicans are really good at this thing called "collusion"

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Republicans DISMANTLING our Education so they can make an American Academy in ONLY THEIR Vision is PROOF that DEMOCRATS are Indoctrinating our Kids!

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It used to not be funny. It's still not, but it used to not, too.

We're already getting four more years of the real thing.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What happened to letting states control that? Every state already has some variation of state academy funded by whatever means is appropriate to the state (probably heavily dependent on DOE). In my state there is an emphasis on studying facts, science, actual academic exercises.

What if my state want to teach more than 6,000 years of history?

[–] nepenthes@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, that's disgraceful.

Funny how much "Agenda47" sounds similar to "Project2025"....

Also, "Merit Based Pay"?! AFAIK there is currently a teacher shortage and this dumbass thinks people are going to abide by a, no doubt, asinine rulebook to make a crappy wage in relation to the schooling required?

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans want public schools to be terrible. The rich will pay for their kids to go to private schools, while the poor will suffer and have less than ideal education so when they are adults, they become the working class and continue to vote Republican because they weren't educated to know better.

[–] nepenthes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know that, I just didn't think they'd go as far as to make a sliding scale of punishing wages for teachers who don't comply.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The idea is that this way, they can retain teachers, who are notoriously hard to hire right now anyway, while also forcing their compliance via wage cuts for wrongthink.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the DOE is no longer around does that mean I no longer have to pay back my student loans.

[–] SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish

Sadly he's just going to privatize them. Interest rates will probably go up, etc, etc.

[–] So_zetta_slowpoke@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they're privatized, could they be discharged through bankruptcy? I hear he's a fan of bankruptcy.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No you can’t discharge private student loans through bankruptcy either.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Only public ones

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

gotta dumb-down the next generation of voters, i guess.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

American Academy sounds like a socialist plan.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, it doesn't. A socialist plan would be offering free tuition to any student to use at any university, free tuition at public universities, or creating and funding schools owned by the staff. This "American Academy" bullshit sounds like a way to A) take over higher education so that it can be propagandized for the right (like they already claim it is for the left), B) Justify defunding other forms of higher education assistance particularly for left leaning universities, and C) funnel billions from tax payers into some hand picked cronies to run his diploma mills and pay it forward in kick backs to him. Mark my words.

They mean "socialist" in the Red Scare way. So exactly like you described, just worded in a way that would make the MAGAs cry.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just have to look at that thing in Florida as the proof of concept, desanctimonious university or whatever it is. Is that even still accredited?

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Making America stupider even. To make sure there are plenty of Republican voters for tomorrow

[–] cordlesslamp6891@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Isn’t it weird that more stupid and uneducated people meaning more republican voters?

But I’m not American so what do I know.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Only one fifth of US-Americans can't read! Lets make it at least a forth for the next "election"!

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago

Agent47 vs agenda47 who would win?