this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
651 points (99.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45883 readers
1098 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The phrase “tax the rich” can be “just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs”, according to the New York City billionaire Steve Roth, who said that the top 1% should be “praised and thanked”.

Speaking on his company’s quarterly earnings call on Tuesday, Roth, the CEO of Vornado Realty Trust, expressed his support for fellow billionaire and the CEO of Citadel, Ken Griffin, who was singled out in the 15 April announcement by New York’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani, of the state’s first “pied-à-terre” tax on second homes valued at more than $5m. In a video, Mamdani announced the policy in front of Griffin’s penthouse, which he said was purchased for $238m.

“We are all shocked that our young mayor would pull this stunt in front of Ken’s home and single him out for ridicule,” Roth said. “This was both irresponsible and dangerous.”

Edit: Mamdani's video that sparked this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLKZnVB4F9k

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deadymouse@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Oh, I think he'll like this inevitable outcome then.

[–] WhyDoYouThinkThat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 hours ago

Just to highlight that as a real estate magnate, his entire empire is built on rent-seeking, i.e. accumulating wealth by the hoarding of a limited resource, without having created anything of value.

This billionaire did not create a billion dollars of value for society, even indirectly; he only took it from others.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 hours ago

"Tax the rich" is the 99% being nice. We could go the France in 1792 route.

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Oh rich please.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

how much proof do we need that the rich are a different species?

[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SirHery@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Eat himmmmm.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 hours ago

That's pretty funny because the phrase doesn't actually have a negative meaning. It's a policy proposal at face value and at depth and that's it. Doesn't say the rich or bad people, although many of them are, doesn't say that nobody should be rich, doesn't even say how much they should be taxed.

And certainly nobody should be thanking the top 1%. We all know that they got there by lying and cheating and stealing and inheriting wealth.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 hours ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago

Ebenezer Scrooge, is that you?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Okay, here's the politically correct version then:

Take a portion of the income and wealth of people of wealth they don't plan on investing in a short period of time (not paid out as wages, etc.).

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 28 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"TAX" is going to be the softest, most palateable verb that will be done to them, the alternatives are a little less polite.

[–] proofchampionship184@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

“Oh, would you prefer ‘torture and execute’ then?” Lmao

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago

My favourite phrase, or at least one that's given me a glimmer of hope for the future is "They will have to invent a new word for what the people are going to do to those responsible."

[–] jestho@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

Torture And eXecute

[–] Longylonglong@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 hours ago

Maybe he should just go fuck himself

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It he prefers "eat the rich", I won't object.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Don’t eat shit.

Mulch the rich.

[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Well he's not wrong, it's definitely hateful. We don't say it because we think it's fair they get billions and we have to scrape by while doing the actual work.

Are both of the following hateful?

  • Tax the rich - at 1%

  • Tax the rich - at 99%

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

That doesn’t make it hateful in the sense that it has been used recently. It’s just a normal response to someone’s horrible behaviour.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lol chop chop, guoillo-bait

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

losing only 8% sounds fair

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

That's retarded

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 31 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

"Tax the rich" is putting it very nicely.

They've dehumanized themselves with their monstrous exploitation.

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago

sure fine whatever

here’s another

kill em all

[–] JPSound@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

Is "guillotine" a softer word? We could and should just use that instead. I'm all about catering to the elites' baby soft thin skin.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago

Bring back the tax brackets from the 1960's. That should solve the problems. Fucking Ronnie Reagan and his deregulation.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

How about "eat the rich" then, motherfucker? With BBQ sauce.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 39 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

He views the Rich as a separate ethnic group.

from wiki:

An ethnicity or ethnic group is a group of humans who identify with each other on the basis of perceived shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups. Attributes that ethnicities believe to share include language, culture, common sets of ancestry, traditions, society, religion, history, or social treatment.

He's mostly right, but that doesn't invalidate criticisms of the Rich.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

I've met some people with this mindset of "i dont give a single fuk if it is not good for me". They also tend to praise billionares and bad dictators. Makes me really curios how their brain works

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 23 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Finally, a morally and ethically acceptable group to do ethnic cleansing on!

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 7 points 11 hours ago

I was against genocide....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

That’s like admitting they live in a completely different world. That’s what blows my mind. By implication, he’s admitting the wealthy exist in a completely separate reality. That the shadow economy is real, and that the average person is effectively a second-class citizen. It’s an acknowledgment that it is, and maybe always has been, us versus them. I've always said they exist in a completely different world, one that operates on different rules than the rest of us. More than just the obvious. Everything you posted, culture, norms, ancestry, history. They will never change to help you. They will always operate from a place of exploitation. It's their culture. They made it so.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

What a little pathetic bitch. Eat the rich

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 216 points 18 hours ago (10 children)

Bitch, taxing the rich is the humane option

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

ok.

if "tax the rich" isn't enough, maybe this will send a stronger message.

1000003720

is this loud enough you old rich fuck?

or maybe this is more your speed?

1000003721

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Tax or eat, Steve, tax or eat!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›