this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
645 points (95.1% liked)

Shitty Life Pro Tip

6474 readers
3 users here now

image!shittylifeprotips



Welcome,

To a place for the shittiest, most mocking "pro-tips" you can think of. This Community is welcome to anything shitty pro-tip related, such as memes, discussing the best shitty tip, and much more.


RULES

1_Don't spam, post must be related to community topic

2_Do not seek mental, medical or professional help here. This is not the place, community is meant for satire.

3_No tip should be taken serious

4_No tip should single out a person

5_No racism, harassing, or discriminating against any group or any of the communities members. This will get you banned immediately.

6_Tip posts must start with SLPT

7_For posts related to SLPTs, but not a tip please use "[META]" tag

8_Self promotion will get you banned


Images/Icon

If you are interested in designing a logo or banner please privately message: @killer_penguin@lemmy.world

Icon Found Here By Gregsuj


Moderation

Looking For 2 Mods

If you are interested in becoming part of the moderation team, please privately message: @killer_penguin@lemmy.world

If you are a current mod on r/shittylifeprotips please DM any current mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 129 points 5 days ago (3 children)

These people don't even consider by mistake the impact that their childish retaliation has on the environment, I find it deeply depressing

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 34 points 5 days ago

My first tought. Dickheads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 101 points 5 days ago (3 children)

God forbid your 2 ton hunk of metal doesn't get free storage everywhere you go.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

While I do agree that cars take up far too much space, charging a guest for parking is a bit of a dick move under most circumstances.

Edit: How much of one depends on circumstance. A dense city with a public transit system is a much different beast than a more inaccessible area. The hotel next to the conference center two tram stops from a park-and-ride has a pretty damn good case for charging for parking.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It still takes up space, that you either have to rent/buy extra as hotel or can't use for more sensible stuff. If anything, if parking is free, everybody is paying the fee even if you don't use parking.

[–] snowdriftissue@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Yes. It's truly infurating how non car owners are forced to subsidize the ever loving shit out pretty much every aspect of car ownership, and then ignorant car brains have the nerve to complain about a small parking fee or gas prices, all while their mode of transportation is pretty much uniquely responsible for unimaginable death, injury, and ecological destruction.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

While I do agree that cars take up far too much space, charging a guest for parking is a bit of a dick move under most circumstances.

They always charge for parking, the difference is in whether they just charge the people that actually show up in a two ton tin can, or just charge everybody regardless of how they got there, in which case it's just worked into the price of the room.

Whether visible on the bill or not, there's no scenario where the price of the land your hotel sits on doesn't factor into the price of your stay.

Which to me also leaves zero moral space for retaliatory b.s. like keeping the water running or destorying furniture.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, charging for hotel parking in NYC, DC, or a dense part of Seattle is an entirely different beast from charging for it in Montana or the outskirts of a national park. The question comes down to if it's reasonable for you to have gotten there without a car and if it's reasonable for you to get around where you're going without one. For places where not having a car with you is unreasonable a parking fee feels like a hidden fee for everyone, where for somewhere you probably flew into and can take public transit around it's charging for an extra amenity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Most hotels would have a good case to charge for parking if we had things like land value taxes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There are so many places in the US that are functionally impossible to travel to, without some very expensive and impractical transit.

Hotels charge parking to make extra money. They need you to drive to them for vacation, otherwise they would go out of buisness

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 55 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Of all the extra fees, parking fees seem like some of the most sensible...

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 29 points 5 days ago

When cars are sacred :)

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, hotels are the one place where I think parking should be free (included in the price, anyway).

I stay there when I'm traveling. There's a decent chance it's either a road trip or I'm flying somewhere and probably renting a car to get around. I don't make a habit of staying at hotels near my home.

There's a bunch of places where you go in your own city, those make more sense to have paid parking because you could more reasonably use public transit or walk.

[–] mech@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago (4 children)

When parking is included in the price, people who visit without a car pay for a service they don't use.
Of course if literally no one arrives without a car, then it's easiest and most transparent to include it.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 days ago

Yep. Plus, if my group carpools but sleeps in multiple rooms, we only have to pay 1 parking fee. If the fee is included then we'd pay per room instead of per vehicle.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 25 points 4 days ago

It's time to stop subsidizing parking spaces. Their land use is actually really expensive and that burden should be on those using the land for storing tons of metal, not cross-financed by those choosing more sustainable means of transport.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 34 points 4 days ago (22 children)

All sorts of comments here are missing the real problem: businesses had a chance to do online meetings. But they dont. So they send people everywhere, staying in hotels, driving up the costs, charging them for parking because they can.

The fallout is everyone pays more. It isn't just people on vacation paying for this.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yep, my job just got done with another round of layoffs for "cost cutting". But you better believe we still have those twice yearly off sites where they fly a few hundred people all over the globe over the course of a year to "get face time".

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 36 points 5 days ago (9 children)

I propose a compromise: Parking is free, but there's a discount if you don't need car storage space.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 20 points 4 days ago

Fuck you dudes get a bike. Or Uber when traveling.

And stop using x.

And while I have your attention, dont forget to brush and floss tonight.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The root problem here is car dependency.

Capitalism creates helplessness in order to exploit it.

[–] Javi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's a beefeater (UK pub/restaurant chain) in my town that recently made their car park pay and display. Their customers have resorted to parking on the grass verges and pavements leading up to the building, causing safety issues (blocking views of turning onto a 50 road, covering pavement and forcing pedestrians into the road; that sort of thing).

I'm sure if the local council started charging them for the damage caused to the green, or even the damage caused by accidents due to their customers choice of parking, the car parking fee would quickly disappear.

Tbh, I'm surprised it hasn't already. Their car park is always empty now, so it's not generating revenue, and they used to have double the amount of cars you see round there now.. so my guess is people fucked off somewhere else, and this attempt at squeezing just resulted in a permanent loss of regular revenue

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 days ago

Yeah we have tons of empty beachfront parking lots around here too because people don't want to pay to park. Instead people park their cars up along the local streets. And even if you do pay to park there, the law requires the lot to be empty by 7pm, so nobody wants to fucking park there even if they pay. Beachfront parking lots are a tragic waste of nature space.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Passive-aggressive bullshit, brought on by emotional immaturity, and social anxiety.

Fucking children running around in adult bodies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 22 points 5 days ago

A small knife can take away some of the caulk around the bathtub if you like to play the long game.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

Is that an X.com ad or what!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Based on all of those "Trivago" commercials I've seen I can only conclude that the whole hotel industry is a scam, trying to trick you into giving them more money than what the room is worth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 8 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Good lord, the amount of people who are unwilling to state what their issue is and actually take an action that will change the problem is ridiculous. Nothing suggested in the comments or the post will ever make a connection in the minds of the hotel's owners or managers. You'll add to their bottom line, sure, but the hotel going out of business isn't necessarily a good thing, considering the building will sit there for a few years, be sold to another chain, and reopen. The other hotels in the area are probably charging the same parking fee, or just folding it into their total cost. Maybe since the first hotel closed, they'll get to tack on more fees with less competition. You've accomplished nothing except adding more waste to the junkyard/garbage dump.

Get your ass onto a review site, clearly explain what you're annoyed with, and state you won't be going back. Go to another review site, repeat. Repeate. Repeatay. One, it makes the issue clearly visible to other people who might now choose to stay elsewhere, and two, it costs the hotel the same (well, maybe the same) amount of money but now they have an incentive to change whatever it is that annoyed you because of people choosing to stay elsewhere until it's changed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Even better, a bit of melted ice cream poured down the air conditioner vents of your polluting rolling hunks of metal will make your car smell like vomit for eternity.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago (15 children)

Jesus, I swear some people are incapable of understanding other places.

I would love to take a train to my vacation destination. Not possible in the US at all. An 8 hour drive can become a 16hr bus or train ride that costs double that of driving.

I live in a country now that has good trains and buses. I love it, it's 100% better.

But I can't bring myself to be so pissed at someone that wants a family vacation and has to drive due to their country's failure to implement public transit.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›