this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
533 points (95.9% liked)
Shitty Life Pro Tip
6467 readers
833 users here now
!shittylifeprotips
Welcome,
To a place for the shittiest, most mocking "pro-tips" you can think of. This Community is welcome to anything shitty pro-tip related, such as memes, discussing the best shitty tip, and much more.
RULES
1_Don't spam, post must be related to community topic
2_Do not seek mental, medical or professional help here. This is not the place, community is meant for satire.
3_No tip should be taken serious
4_No tip should single out a person
5_No racism, harassing, or discriminating against any group or any of the communities members. This will get you banned immediately.
6_Tip posts must start with SLPT
7_For posts related to SLPTs, but not a tip please use "[META]" tag
8_Self promotion will get you banned
Images/Icon
If you are interested in designing a logo or banner please privately message: @killer_penguin@lemmy.world
Moderation
Looking For 2 Mods
If you are interested in becoming part of the moderation team, please privately message: @killer_penguin@lemmy.world
If you are a current mod on r/shittylifeprotips please DM any current mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While I do agree that cars take up far too much space, charging a guest for parking is a bit of a dick move under most circumstances.
Edit: How much of one depends on circumstance. A dense city with a public transit system is a much different beast than a more inaccessible area. The hotel next to the conference center two tram stops from a park-and-ride has a pretty damn good case for charging for parking.
Charging for limited stuff makes sense, otherwise the hotel would need as many parking spots as it has beds
Yeah, charging for hotel parking in NYC, DC, or a dense part of Seattle is an entirely different beast from charging for it in Montana or the outskirts of a national park. The question comes down to if it's reasonable for you to have gotten there without a car and if it's reasonable for you to get around where you're going without one. For places where not having a car with you is unreasonable a parking fee feels like a hidden fee for everyone, where for somewhere you probably flew into and can take public transit around it's charging for an extra amenity.
That parking lot could have been another freaking hotel instead of car storage, and you're saying it should be free.
Yep I am.
It still takes up space, that you either have to rent/buy extra as hotel or can't use for more sensible stuff. If anything, if parking is free, everybody is paying the fee even if you don't use parking.
Yes. It's truly infurating how non car owners are forced to subsidize the ever loving shit out pretty much every aspect of car ownership, and then ignorant car brains have the nerve to complain about a small parking fee or gas prices, all while their mode of transportation is pretty much uniquely responsible for unimaginable death, injury, and ecological destruction.
Most hotels would have a good case to charge for parking if we had things like land value taxes.
Sadly people seem to struggle with thinking in terms that aren't black and white. A position like yours seems to blow their mind.
It's really not. Most of the time this is because the local jurisdiction taxes parking in some way, and as is always the case in the US, the local business isn't going to absorb those fees.
Either pay for parking directly, or pay for it in the cost of the room regardless if you parked or not.