this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
433 points (99.3% liked)

News

37314 readers
1412 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The administration of United States President Donald Trump has announced plans to expand the use of the federal death penalty, including through the deployment of firing squads.

The announcement on Friday was part of a policy document issued by the Department of Justice, setting out the legal argument for various methods of execution.

It touted steps for “restoring and strengthening” the death penalty as integral to the pursuit of justice.

“The Department of Justice acted to restore its solemn duty to seek, obtain, and implement lawful capital sentences — clearing the way for the Department to carry out executions once death-sentenced inmates have exhausted their appeals,” the Justice Department said in a news release.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

In a two tiered justice system where the rich have no accountability I can't see this being problematic at all. America is a shit hole country now.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Had been for quite awhile now, longer than we’ve been able to see it.

[–] Jako302@feddit.org 20 points 18 hours ago

And everyone on this side of the pond said I'm overreacting by calling trumps immigrant detention centers "concentration camps", but here we are. Even the Nazis didn't start as fast with their genocide as the orange turd seems to try.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Shooting the pedos? Let’s start there.

[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Will they start with child rapists?!

[–] frightful5680@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

Nope just immigrants

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Add Russian agents to the list.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 10 points 18 hours ago

Death penalty is stupid because now ppl who Commit a crime will just all in.

Death for being a rally? Guess ill just commit to politicians instead

Death for aborting rapist baby. Guess ill kill the rapist and maybe a few morw while im at it.

Etc etc

[–] la508@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago

The death penalty is anathema to civilised society.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Always a fucking day he comes up with an awful idea.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago

He means Death Squads. Every Republican accusation was an admission of guilt.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Would anybody be interested in a party at The White House on July 4th? BYOF(Bring Your Own Fireworks).

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Don't let the trump folk know about being "drawn and quartered". Those fuckers will jump on that like white on rice. Can you say "trump/epstein" files?

[–] islandcoda42@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Or the Blood Eagle execution the Vikings used to do, yikes 😳

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Blood eagles were only mentioned by Christian skalds hundreds of years after the viking age. There is zero contemporary historical evidence that vikings ever practiced that form of execution.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 62 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Nothing should be a clearer indication that the death penalty should not exist than lunatics like him controlling it.

[–] frightful5680@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's funny how all the countries with autocrats or legal corruption love the death penalty

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Itakes perfect sense really. They want to be able to legally execute their political enemies and anyone ideologically opposed to them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope he does this, then the next president comes in and trump gets sentenced to death for treason lol.

Unlikely but a nice dream

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I have absolutely no faith anyone will ever give these psychos any consequenses, especially not any democrat. That would mean they themselves would be open to consequenses, and that simply won't do for the ruling class. The worst that is ever going to happen to Trump through legal and peaceful means, is that he'll be sentenced to house arrest at Mar-a-lago, and even that is doubtful. Any other punishment will have to be done by the people.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Hell it's a toss-up whether or not he'll survive until the election. He's under assault from both the outside and his own body. It's just a question of what gets to him first a bullet or the dementia.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Let's start with them.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can we start with the pedophiles?

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but only the poor ones.

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Tbh if I was on death row, I think I'd prefer firing squad to some drug cocktail

[–] SteveGoob@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Smart choice. Lethal injection has a terrible history in reliably killing someone without issues. A firing squad is significantly more humane, and people on death row will generally opt for it if given the choice.

However, it's far less common today because society doesn't like firing squads; everything about them feels too barbaric.

Hmmm I wonder why that is... Surely it couldn't be because capital punishment itself has no place in civilized society, right?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 180 points 1 day ago (6 children)
  1. Build massive secretive camps that house thousands and thousands of people

  2. Raise a personal gestapo to hunt down and disappear immigrants

  3. Pass laws that brand anyone left of Reagan as a domestic terrorist

  4. Call for more firing squads

  5. ???

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago

They don't call it fascist dystopia for no reason.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 81 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I hope this is foreshadowing for the trump regime being executed as war criminals.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 day ago

Abolish the death penalty completely no reason to trust the state with this power.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 101 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Whenever capital punishment comes up, I am reminded of the hypocrisy of American Christians.

Pretty much every Christian claims to believe that killing is prohibited by the ten commandments. In a democracy, if you vote for a politician who supports the death penalty, you are asking them to kill a person on your behalf. A Christian should not be able to vote for a politician who supports the death penalty.

Compare that with abortion. The bible says virtually nothing about abortion except how to pray for one. If you vote for a pro-choice politician, nobody is being killed on your behalf.

Compare these two, and it's obvious that a Christian who votes for a pro-death-penalty and anti-abortion candidate is voting against their own religion. But they claim to be voting for Christian values, which is pure hypocrisy.

[–] leoj@piefed.social 48 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I think we are reaching a point where its an open secret that the words of Jesus are purely marketing for Christianity and the reality is quite uglier.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

As someone raised in the church, but did not fall into white nationalism like so many Republicans, they will absolutely never be swayed by logic. They're literally brainwashed in a cult. Jesus is no different than a member of antifa to them. They only care about themselves, their cult, its leader, and seeing other people hurt. None of those things are in the ten commandments. If judgement day came today, every single one of them would have a reserved seat in a particularly nasty place in Hell.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The bible says virtually nothing about abortion except how to pray for one.

It actually literally has a recipe for it

[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

It actually says no, no less than three times, that life begins at the first breath, thereby obliterating 90% of the anti abortion talking points.

[–] Iamcanadian@piefed.ca 19 points 1 day ago

Searching for ways to go as low as possible, this orange administration. Very creative.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 day ago

I warned about this before the election. People thought I was crazy...

Republicans have literally been talking about this for years...

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (19 children)

If I supported capital punishment, I'd be in favor of firing squads over lethal injection. It's more honest. Shooting someone is clearly meant to kill while lethal injection dresses it up like a medical procedure.

I oppose capital punishment though. The criminal justice system is not reliable enough to only punish those truly guilty of the worst crimes, it doesn't seem to be a more effective deterrent than imprisonment, and it usually ends up costing more than imprisonment for an offender's natural lifespan.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (16 children)

I mean...

There's completely painless ways to die.

That's what the whole assisted suicide thing is in civilized countries.

The "problem" is, that's completely painless, you just go to sleep. And the people who want this, want it to be a painful gruesome death.

It's not justice or even removing an uncontrollable element, it's vengeance. And vengeance has to be painful.

There's nothing stopping an ethical death penalty except the ethics of the people implementing

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›