this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
266 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

6579 readers
368 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

OH THANK GOD

Edit: why no zero option.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 17 hours ago

because fuck you watch our ads that’s why

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 3 points 17 hours ago

this is app only and the 0 hour limit is now gone

sadly useless advice now

[–] stray@pawb.social 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why don't they just make them behave like normal videos? The problem with shorts is the repeating and the endless scrolling (and the ever-present prompt to scroll). A lot of perfectly useful/entertaining content has been recommended to me by the static presentation on the home screen.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's the whole idea of shorts and tiktok style though; rapidly consuming quick content.

I think its interesting that for some people, that experience is deeply uncomfortable, and for others its necessary. It may sound over the top but I see a lot of parallels to hard drug addiction.

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't think it's necessary for anyone, though I understand you probably mean they feel it is. They've done at least one study I read which showed that being fed content actually makes you stupid in the immediate short-term (long-term was outside the scope of the study). Consuming the same content by selecting which ones you want to see caused no problems. It's the removal of agency that's thought to be the problem, training your brain to be passive.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 6 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I just use this extension that plays them like normal videos. The UX for shorts is dumb as fuck

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 5 points 20 hours ago

I use this simple userscript, no need for a random extension that only works in chrome https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/439993-youtube-shorts-redirect/code

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Same it's the best of both. Sometimes I actually want to watch a short because it's relevant. The problem is that the UI autoplays the next video and you can't time scrub back to the bit you probably wanted to see a second time and before you know it you're watching cat videos and 1 hour has passed.

[–] cybernihongo@reddthat.com 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

NewPipe literally has none of this shit. The various invidious instances as well. If you continue to use the official YouTube app, that's on you.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago

Even Revanced has the options to hide Shorts or open them as regular videos. So does youtube.com with a simple Redirector rule.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

Mine doesn't have an option for 0.

Lame.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago

Those shorts are entertaining little chunks of nothing that have no date and are usually cut off at the end. I'm thankful I can urn them off.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago
[–] Padit@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hated how shorts were designed to draw me into this app so much, that i deleted it all together. Now i reinstalled it, just to find out, that the feature is not yet rolled out to me.

[–] umfk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I used revanced to completely disable shorts in the YouTube app.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

Absurd that we need YouTube for that. In an ideal world, YouTube would be a backend service with an open API which there would be dozens of different apps for, with different features, including maybe this one… but I suppose you can't make money with an ideal world…

Already blocked with revanced

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 88 points 2 days ago

Shorts should have been a different app in the first place

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Maybe I’m using Shorts in a different way, but I’m not seeing a problem with them. I just view them through the home page and they’re in my suggested list like every other video. I consider them just another format of video to watch.

I think the difference is I look at them like discreet units and then jump back to my homepage as opposed to doomscrolling them.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

that’s great but it is simple as I don’t want to

nothing more need be discussed

modern companies are just trash

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For people browsing on mobile in the youtube app(the vast majority, i imagine), if you click a short it will take you into the shorts interface, which is designed to maximally draw users in to doomscrolling. On pc its a very different experience and easier to disengage since it just pops up like a normal video (usually?)

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

That makes sense. I rarely use my phone except to cast to my TV. Majority of where I use it is on PC

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have two main conplaints about shorts, myself, the end result of which is that I prefer to just never see them in my feed, ever.

  1. Most shorts that pop up for me are literally just clips from longer form videos I've already seen, or are already on my Watch Later list. And there's SO damn many of them. Those types of shorts are purely clutter.

  2. The other type of shorts I see most often are just aping the tiktok format, characterized by being extremely shallow and low-effort, as well as having the INFURIATING tendency to be over-edited for length trimming. You know the type of editing I mean, the one where the creator apparently thinks that even pausing to BREATHE between words or thoughts is too much downtime in the video. I find it insulting that TikTok and now YouTube have normalized the idea that creators should be so overwhelmingly desperate to capture every moment of your attention. Plus, it's pretty well understood by now that feeding your attention that heavily is wildly unhealthy for your brain.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

This really fucks up the delivery and timing of comedy clips. I’ll admit I watch a lot of shorts and there are some specific creators who are really good at it. Shout out to miniminuteman and hydronyc.

I quickly run into terribly cut clips that are only coherent when you watch the full video, and of course a plethora of AI slop of both clips and ads.

I need to get off this shit.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (3 children)

used Revanced to get rid of them already

[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Heard it got discontinued by devs leaving over POS repo owner and that "Morphe" is it's successor with the devs moving there instead.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

great, more drama for me to figure out.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

I feel you. Learned about it just recently but revanced still works for me so I'm not going to bother changing anything right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

It doesn't actually turn off shorts, just prevents (limits) infinite scrolling.

You'll still be recommended shorts and if you accidentally click a short it will play.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Blocked with uBO a long time ago. lmao

[–] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] remon@ani.social 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Not out of the box, but it can block basically anything if you create a custom filter.

I even use it to re-size the thumbnails so I get 5 videos per row on my feed instead of just 3.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago

You can block lots of things with the picker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I don't watch shorts, but I've checked the setting anyway and the minimum that it allows for me is 15 minutes, not 0.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

i just set up a redirect from /shorts/video-id to /watch?v=video-id. then you get the normal player.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The player isn't the issue with shorts. It's the content.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

There is more than one issue with YouTube Shorts

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 22 hours ago

my subscriptions usually upload shorter updates or extra bits as shorts, so i want to keep them on without the horrendous ui.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

There’s no zero option though, I just checked. Apparently that’s coming soon.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

I didn't see one either - I'm in Denmark, maybe it's rolling out in different regions?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

About god damned time, we dont want tiktok

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Wonder what would happen to society if ultra-short continuous video feeds like these would get banned.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've had the Unhook extension for years, and YouTube's decision not to make Shorts hideable was the catalyst. I still won't uninstall it because it gets rid of a bunch of YouTube's other trash, but this is at least moves the needle so it's no longer unthinkable to uninstall it.

[–] LightYagami@lemmus.org 5 points 2 days ago

PipePipe has no shorts to begin!

load more comments
view more: next ›