this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
654 points (99.4% liked)

World News

55513 readers
2763 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine said it took a Russian position using just drones and ground robots.

Zelenskyy said it was a wartime first, and no Ukrainian infantry was involved.

He said robots have done over 22,000 missions in three months, keeping many soldiers from harm.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] baeb66@lemmy.today 18 points 16 hours ago

Russian soldiers have been recorded surrendering to both aerial drones and ground robots in this war, including by writing messages of surrender that they presented to the operator via the onboard camera and surrendering after notes telling them to do so were dropped by drones.

Surrendering to a machine sounds humiliating but still a better option than going back to the Russian military.

[–] Alberat@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

sudo make the Russians retreat

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You are not in the sudoers file, this incident will be reported

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 6 points 16 hours ago

Sudo delete the incident report

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One small step for man, one giant warning siren for mankind.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah.. I really don't like the changes that the Russian Invasion of Ukraine are making to war.

Cheap Kamikaze drones, unmanned roving gun turrets, etc etc.. Removing men on the ground feels like its gonna make it easier to pursue and lust for wars as these technologies continue to advance further and remove the human components.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

What happens when it's an occupying force? i.e. mainly around civilians.

It's going to be a special kind of hell.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

well said. No boots on the ground doesn't seem to mean less wars, just more wars with less boots on ground.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Yep.

it doesnt mean less wars.

It just means more innocent/civilian suffering.

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Well, the future looks bright enough. We may work to death in captailist states, but at least robots will fight each other, so no need for soldiers.

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

Robots will fight each other over the burnt remnants of our homes.

[–] lemmock@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

...until one of the warring countries runs out of robots anyway. That's when the real fun starts!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

robots will fight each other, so no need for soldiers.

Ukrainian remote operators are killing Russian soldiers today.

In another few weeks, a Russian advance will take territory containing Ukrainian operators. At which point, well...

This can fill the void that Battlebots' cancellation left behind.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Robot Wars was a documentary

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 172 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Begun, the drone wars have

[–] ramasses@social.ozymandias.club 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is some ultrakill bullshit

Context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrakill?wprov=sfla1

SpoilerThe Final War led to the invention of blood-powered machines as mostly soldiers and an arms race. A climate catastrophe caused by the war led to the Sun being blotted out, ending the war. Humans during the New Peace discovered and then started expeditions into Hell, up until their eventual extinction.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago

That's metal AF on so many levels. Gotta play this one.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As always, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

things are going to get really weird

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 31 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Good intentions and human skulls.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 108 points 1 day ago

Dad said "Mario Kart is a waste of time, son."

That's General son to you, Dad.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What an amazing entrée to untold horrors

This is nothing but an amuse-bouche compared to the future I foresee.

[–] Asmodeus77@lemmy.today 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

May there be mercy on man and machine for their sins…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Wait, I'm on the side of the robots for this one?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So... we got two ways to go. One the robot on robot wars end up wiping us all out by exhausting all or resources and of course killing civilians. Or we take to space and have the robot wars stay on earth. Mars at least I figure. For a few at least.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or… send the robots to mars to fight…

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, but the resources they want to fight over are on earth... for now. Humans will just have to keeping moving to stay out of the robots way.

[–] chrizzly@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Or Geonosis

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

The age of drone on drone violence will make war more palatable to citizens.

[–] juanito_the_great@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I really, honestly hope you are right. Sadly, I think you are wrong. I've recently been exposed to the concepts of "human safari" and "drone siege" and they aren't pretty. "Drone on drone" might be just the preamble of these.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

I do not mean it will be tolerable to be near. I mean citizens of nations who choose war will tolerate it more if their own soldiers are not dying in war. If war requires less people and more "stuff" to wage, citizens will feel less motivation to speak out against it. It will make waging war more of an option not less of one, if only equipment is being lost.

[–] slaeg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No preamble, unfortunately. The Russians are doing these "human safaris", which are, of course, clear as day war crimes, to train their drone pilots.

Also to terrorize and wear out the civilian population of course, which is the Russian way of war.

AI drones are coming along, but these won't only be used on other drones or robots, that much we can know already.

Indeed, I meant that in a hypothetical "drone vs drone" war, after the drones win the attacks on civilians and sieges will most likely come after.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Possible. It does seem like drones fighting drones should mean less human casualties, which has both a humanitarian side and an escalation risk side.

Then again a lot of people have thought their weapons would make war less deadly, and been very wrong, including the case of WWI-era artillery.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They "accidentally" told the drones/robots to attack the schools and hospitals. "We would never do that on purpose"

"Well why were the terrorists using school children as human shields!"

I doubt it will ever stop

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] untorquer@quokk.au 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

No one will give a shit about robots dying. The drones will either be attempting to war crime civillians or intercept said war crime robots.

And drone intercept rates arent even close to that not being scary.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yes, but human soldiers doing atrocities is nothing new (unfortunately). There's no obvious reason to think drones will make that particular aspect of warfare worse.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People will give a shit about the robots dying once their side starts running low.

When shit turns into Helm's Deep, when the robots are taking out the last of your defenses, you'll give a shit lol.

Think of the drones and robots less like soldiers/planes and more like a thousand points that make up a force field. As that field decays, so does your protection beneath it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Until the drones start getting used on civilians. Which is absolutely going to happen and soon.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s been happening for ages already. What reality do you people live in?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The thing I fear is that this just becomes a ridiculously futile war of resource attrition. It all comes down to who has more metals and chips and armaments to keep throwing at the other's pools of the same until one gives up. What a waste...

...But then again, writing this, I realize that's almost already how they treat human soldiers so...what will change, I wonder?

Exactly. We're already there with which side has more human resources. Meanwhile asymmetric warfare is an escalation of technology and the resources to produce them. Sure, you can tip the balance of power on the battlefield with very clever use of resources, but it's ultimately a contest of who is willing to dump the most into the conflict.

It could also be argued that technological warfare in a global economy makes resource blockades even more important. Nobody is 100% reliant on their homeland resources anymore. To effectively siege your opponent, you have to cut off everything that can fuel their ability to make war. That can be a huge perimeter in some cases.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grahamja@reddthat.com 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Western Infantry officers will be in shambles if this could be repeated again and again. It has to be tough killing one UGV while quad copters are overhead let alone dozens of them rolling up.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Nah, infantry officers would be over the moon if they didn’t have to throw bodies at fortified positions anymore and could just be tasked with holding the AO that the drones assaulted.

load more comments
view more: next ›