this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
104 points (96.4% liked)

News

36201 readers
2891 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 92 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It would take some balls to convict and sentence a President-elect, and of course Trump would have major personal grievances against the Judge, but if justice is blind, he deserves the same punishment as any other New Yorker who would have committed such crimes 34 times.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

Also, it would've been a faster trial and sentencing.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

If blind, he would’ve been sentenced before election.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he's not in office.

his interference in 2016 helped get him there the first time.

his current status is partly due to that as well.

he deserves a max sentence for the significance of the events occurring in-part as a result of the illegal election interference for which he was convicted.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 27 points 1 year ago
[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's guess: guilty but no penalties

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they could fine him a couple thousand dollars and tell him not to do it again or else.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt Trump would even pay a token fine. The consequences for not paying a fine is that the punishment could escalate, but the punishment can't escalate so why pay?

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

That bitch prolly got “paying a fine for felonies” insurance

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know it won't happen, but I would love to see him be dictator "on day one only" while in Riker's.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you think won't happen? That he'll go to Rikers, or that he'll only be a dictator for one day?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The former. Well both. I don't think it will just be one day.

[–] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the justice system worked his conviction here would be cause enough to be ineligible for office (as well as each of his 34 felony convictions).

Since this happened prior to this term it also cannot be claimed an official act.

Theoretically something could be done about this before he’s sworn in, but I doubt it.

America, we’re really about to give a felon the keys to the kingdom even though the constitution forbids it because nobody in a position of power here cares to go through the trouble. Hope you’re happy.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. He is not a sitting president yet.

  2. He was not a sitting president when the offenses occurred in 2016, either, when he had yet to be elected. Even if the "presidential immunity" ruling could somehow be twisted to apply to this as if it were an official act, he was in no way shape or form president at that time.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

He will face no consequences and that’s fucking garbage

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Convict him, lock him up, and tell Vance "If you leave him there you get to be the president."

[–] preludeofme@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah not much of a consolation prize there... 😐

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

At least the guy knows how to order donuts for large group

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The last assassination attempt was to try to get Vance in.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago

I can already tell ya he’s free to go.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck is there somewhere online I can place a bet on this?

Might as well turn a profit off if this horrible fucking clown show.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does it even matter at this point? Can't he just throw pardons everywhere as needed once he takes office?

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Presidential pardons can only be for federal crimes and he has NY state convictions. That judge has the power to put him in jail for most of his term (subject to appeal)

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds good.

President in prison his entire term.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'll wear Prison President as a badge of honor.

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not the dumbest thing they'd be wearing. Wouldn't even make top 5

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Sad day for many of my hopes