this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
261 points (98.2% liked)

politics

29340 readers
2538 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So a Cuban "victory" will come with sanctions lifted, the closure of Guantanamo Bay, and South Beach ceded.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago

What "next" or "conquest" for that matter?

America didn't conquer anything in at least half a century, and no removing a government isn't "conquest".

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's wild how millions of people will be murdered partly because this manbaby needs attention, affirmation, etc.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

More about market manipulation and distraction. He does it because it's proven to work.

[–] wizbiz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago
[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 111 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] zd9@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

He's pissing off so many people, it's really only a matter of time.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 57 points 2 days ago
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (2 children)

'Conquest'? By basically every measure Iran was not a conquest.

[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago

Neither was Venezuala

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

It was kind of a conquest for Iran. Obviously it's not over yet though. It's never going to be over.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How much shit like that does he have to say before higher-ups in the government collectively realize he's unfit for office and quickly pass a common sense vote to remove him? The fuck.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Look at Stalin after 1945, who was just as insane. Everybody near Stalin knew he was insane, and causing immense damage to the Soviet Union. And nobody did anything, because the first person to make a move would be killed by Stalin. They only got rid of Stalin by "failing" to send in a doctor when Stalin had a heart attack.

I assume that in the case of both Trump, the root of the problem is the broad support among the common people. Any Republican politician who speaks strongly against Trump will 1) receive death threats from MAGA 2) be ignored and 3) be primaried HARD.

[–] lb_o@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Oh brother those who were voted in perfectly know that, and they are in power because of that.

Others scream, but can't do much without people's support.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 4 points 2 days ago

We've seen what it took the German government to get corporate money out of government, and quite honestly, I'd give the Germans a lot more credit than Americans.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Literally can't go a single day without shutting the fuck up

Doesn't he go every day without shutting the fuck up?

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Gotta keep that stock market moving.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If Trump invades or threatens to invade cuba, his skills from “the Art of the Deal” will probably result in Cuba owning Texas or Florida.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 days ago

Well now I want this to happen...

Going for the soft target that can‘t realistically fight back and wreck the world economy so he can claim a victory? What a weak son of a bitch he is.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Good god, a ground invasion of Cuba after sustained bombing, I can't even imagine how that would work out, except obviously not well for anyone, not the least with these guys in charge.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

Here is the post:

“All U.S. Ships, Aircraft, and Military Personnel, with additional Ammunition, Weaponry, and anything else that is appropriate and necessary for the lethal prosecution and destruction of an already substantially degraded Enemy, will remain in place in, and around, Iran, until such time as the REAL AGREEMENT reached is fully complied with. If for any reason it is not, which is highly unlikely, then the "Shootin' Starts," bigger, and better, and stronger than anyone has ever seen before. It was agreed, a long time ago, and despite all of the fake rhetoric to the contrary - NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS and, the Strait of Hormuz WILL BE OPEN & SAFE. In the meantime our great Military is Loading Up and Resting, looking forward, actually, to its next Conquest. AMERICA IS BACK!”

Trump always admits things by being Mr Opposite. This tells me they've been planning, or seriously discussing, nuke strikes.

I'm not sure if any of them are dumb enough, but I'm consistently surprised by how evil they all are. I'm not putting it past them at this point.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The no new wars president said he is starting new wars? I am shocked, shocked I tell ya

[–] lennee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

obviously he has to start new wars to end them , that peace price has to be paid for in blood... or something like that

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So a Cuban “victory” will come with sanctions lifted, the closure of Guantanamo Bay, and South Beach ceded.

I wish, but I don't think Cuba has any kind of leverage that would cost the US anything. I'm pretty concerned that this will actually be an "easy win". :/

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think Cuba has any kind of leverage that would cost the US anything.

Cubans have their own military and mid-range weapons. They aren't nearly as fortified as the Iranians, and they don't have a straight line to Russia or China for support, but they can absolutely put missiles all along the Gulf Coast if push comes to shove. They're - bare minimum - as dangerous as Yemen is to Saudi Arabia.

It would be hell on earth for the island, though. Nobody actually wants a shooting war with the US. God only knows how many civilians would die as a result.

And the real second-order consequence of a US invasion of Cuba would be the flood of refugees. People would flee the island in droves. Jamaica, the Yucatan, the Bahamas, Haiti, hell Florida - they'd be inundated with people fleeing the country. As bad as US relations are with the Caribbean states, this would make things so much worse. You're talking about and island of 10M people. It would be chaos.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Lotta oil refineries in range of Cuba.

Naval drones in the Mississippi delta would be a problem.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Iran could supply drones to Cuba. It would be one way to give the United States a swirly, and further increasing the value of the Hormuz. Why settle for being merely 20% of the world's supply of oil, when you can shrink the pie?

[–] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unless Russia sends them some missiles. 🤔

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Honestly that would be hilarious, on brand stupidity for Trump: Allows Russian "oil" to reach Cuba, along with the oil are parts for nuclear weapons, cuban missile crisis 2.0. lol

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even things like Shaheds would be a bad time. At least Florida if not much of the South would be in range. Just like the Russian imperial core we would be rudely reminded that we are not untouchable.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

I figure mar a lago is in shahed range

[–] Lupus108@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

cuban missile crisis 2.0.

Omfg Cuban missile crisis with that ding dong at the helm? The outcome would be nuclear Holocaust.

On the bright side...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

On the bright side...

He's like a Cold War Bo Burnham, LOL

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

So his total failure in Iran does not stop him from trying the idiot game again...

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

The goal shouldn't be military conquest. We're supposed to be past the age of empires

[–] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago

Gotta keep distracting people from the fact that he rapes children.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As good a general as Adolf was.

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 6 points 2 days ago

And just like the First, it worked out at the very beginning when people weren't expecting it but then quickly turned to shit, just on a very accelerated timeline.