this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
88 points (92.3% liked)

Canada

11842 readers
425 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

Fuck the US. No one cares.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago

Canada cites American existence as a trade irritant.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 58 points 4 days ago

Free Trade with the US is coming to an end, we should never have integrated with the US as much as we did, but now we need to suck it up and pivot hard. Build sovereign control, from top to bottom, soup to nuts, servers, enterprise, banking, investment, supply chains, defense, everything that gives the US or any other hostile entity leverage over us.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

America is gross. Just utterly gross. Change my mind.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Hi, USA person here to say yes, this person is correct.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

We are far past needing an American to agree with us.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The current U.S. regime as a whole is an irritant to the entire world.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

Except Russia and Israel....

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 29 points 4 days ago

I thought Americans didn't need us for anything so maybe they can fuck off?

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Hey, no fair, they won't give us free access and control over their citizen's data"

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Spoiler, bell and rogers already hand over subscriber data by the boatload. How do you think those "we caught you torrenting" emails make it to the "right" people?

[–] thefool@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

They are required by law to do this.

No customer data is sent to the copyright notice issuer unless they decide to go after that subscriber in court. Only a "delivered" or "not delivered for reason X" gets sent back to them.

Source: I had a large part in building one of these systems

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

Studios monitor public torrents, and through legal channels ask warnings to be sent via the ISP to their client at that address. The studio does not receive the customer data

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do they still send those out to Canadians? Or maybe it's cuz I only torrent nostalgia.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

If you torrent anything new or popular they still send them out though I haven't seen one in years some of the idiots I work with get them weekly.

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 days ago

And it still doesn't go far enough.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago

From the bottom of my heart: Get fucked wankees!!!

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 4 days ago

This site appears to be a wall of ads and one liner new headers with no details.

What is this? How about a real source?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wish it were… the entire thing is going to Microslop with their pinky promise to fight their own gov in court should the orange child molester demand our data

And this is even AFTER Microslop already admitted in European court that, should such demmand happen, they'd be powerless to deny it

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As I understand it the EU is giving a big F off to US tech companies and will start doing their own stuff. Canada should do the exact same. Get the big tech giants the boot, I am all for open sourcing the whole government computer stuff.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

100%... yet we are pretending to do that while giving Microslop all the contracts

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is a chicken or the egg thing, people use windows at home so employers and educators use windows at their work places. For the most part at least.

We need to teach boards of education that they could save money if instead of using windows or chromium they used Linux we could force businesses to adapt to the new people coming into the work force. If we could convince governments to make the switch, we would be that much closer to socialism!

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree with your point but it has nothing to do with the topic here. Nobody storing data in Microslops Azure would see or notice what cloud it is (as a matter of fact most of Azure is Linux)

The choice of giving Microslop our data to hold and pretend we are building a sovereign cloud is absolutely absurd.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was just pointing out that we need to strip Microslop out of the lives of the average person so that they do not get tricked into paying for Microslop services and letting their data be stored on US based companies servers. I am not surprised that Microslop uses Linux in their server racks, most of the internet is run off of Linux.

Our sovereign cloud needs to be based in Canada on Canadian hardware. I would go as far as saying that the hardware needs to be open source as well, I would be fine-ish with ARM but would really prefer RISC-V CPU’s and GPU’s. I am not familiar with any open hardware RAM or Disks but we need stuff.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I absolutely agree with you here

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

What fucking garbage website is this? There's nothing to read.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Came here to ask the same thing... I don't get it, there's literally nothing there but headlines

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is what I see:

OTTAWA — The United States has flagged Canada’s early interest in a sovereign cloud that would bar foreign governments from accessing data without consent as a potential trade irritant.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer included it among several procurement issues in the annual report on foreign trade barriers he submitted Tuesday to U.S. Congress and President Donald Trump.

As always, Canada’s tightly controlled dairy market got a mention. So did the Online Streaming Act and the Online News Act, which Greer has flagged as priorities for the coming review of the North American trade pact. The federal government’s Buy Canadian policy for contracts over $25 million is a new one this year, as are moves by some provinces to keep U.S. alcohol out of liquor stores. The long wait for regulatory approval of aircraft and a proposed change to the disclosure rules regarding fragrance allergens in cosmetics also debuted on this year’s list. Gabriel Brunet, a spokesperson for Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, said the government’s trade team is reviewing the report.

On the sovereign cloud, the report cites an August 2025 “request for information” by Shared Services Canada, the federal government’s central information technology agency, asking Canadian suppliers about their ability to provide the federal government with a “fully sovereign public cloud solution.”

That feedback would then be considered in future procurement policy development, which the agency framed as a response to “emerging challenges relating to digital sovereignty.” Shared Services did not mention the U.S. specifically, but the onset of Trump’s trade war and his threats to annex Canada by “economic force” months earlier had thrust the issue into the spotlight.

Greer’s report notes the proposal calls for cloud services where data would be “processed, transmitted and stored exclusively in Canada.” It would exclude suppliers subject to laws letting foreign governments access Canada’s data without written consent. (Another requirement Greer did not mention: providers could not be “subject to foreign laws that permit foreign governments to request measures that could affect or discontinue the service.”)

Shared Services said it was unable to comment in time for publication, but an update to the request for information suggests the conditions highlighted in Greer’s report remain. In its notice, the agency said it had invoked the National Security Exception for all stages of the procurement process for sovereign cloud services. That means nothing in any of Canada’s free trade agreements barring such protectionism would apply.

There is a difference, though, between exploring the possibility of creating a “fully sovereign public cloud solution” and actually doing it—especially without U.S. tech giants.

The federal government acknowledged as much last October in its “framework” on digital sovereignty: “It is impossible for the [government of Canada] to obtain a state of complete digital sovereignty, known as digital autonomy, due to the absolute interconnected nature of the digital world.” Manav Gupta, IBM Canada’s chief technology officer, told The Logic last month that the views of Canadian politicians on digital sovereignty had been “maturing.”

In January 2025, the federal government said it would review its business relationship with Amazon after the e-commerce firm closed its fulfillment centres and sorting facilities in Quebec. As The Logic reported, that review led officials to conclude that Ottawa’s reliance on Amazon Web Services, its second-largest cloud vendor, limited its leverage against the tech giant.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Thanks! Not sure if it's the mobile layout that's cooked, or maybe it's paywalled or something? All I see are headlines.

Greer’s report notes the proposal calls for cloud services where data would be “processed, transmitted and stored exclusively in Canada.” It would exclude suppliers subject to laws letting foreign governments access Canada’s data without written consent. (Another requirement Greer did not mention: providers could not be “subject to foreign laws that permit foreign governments to request measures that could affect or discontinue the service.”)

Lmao, yeah that's kind of the point - why would anybody want a foreign country snooping their shit? I suppose if there's any benefit to breaking this wall it would be that it would (hopefully) force the Canadian government and businesses to ditch Microsoft. The fact we use them as much as we do is terrifying. A contract is only as trustworthy as the person you signed it with, and I have little faith that MS isn't already snooping the massive amounts of foreign government data they have their hands on.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

Womp womp. The American negotiating team can go cry us a Fraser/Saskatchewan/Niagara/St. Lawrence.