this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
175 points (98.3% liked)

science

26172 readers
944 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://ibbit.at/post/213236

“Think of this as a human body,” says Javier González.

In front of me is essentially a metal box on wheels. Standing at around a meter in height, it reminds me of a stainless-steel counter in a restaurant kitchen. It is covered in flexible plastic tubing—which act as veins and arteries—connecting a series of transparent containers, the organs of this machine.

What makes it extra special is the role of the cream-colored tub that sits on its surface. Ten months ago, González, a biomedical scientist who developed the device with his colleagues at the Carlos Simon Foundation, carefully placed a freshly donated human uterus in the tub. The team connected it to the device’s tubes and pumped in modified human blood.

The device kept the uterus alive for a day—a new feat that could represent the first step to the long-term maintenance of uteruses outside the human body. The work has not yet been published.

The team members want to keep donated human uteruses alive long enough to see a full menstrual cycle. They hope this will help them study diseases of the uterus and learn more about how embryos burrow their way into the organ’s lining at the start of a pregnancy. They also hope that future iterations of their device might one day sustain the full gestation of a human fetus.

The machine is technically called PUPER, which stands for “preservation of the uterus in perfusion.” But González’s colleague Xavier Santamaria says the team has adopted a nickname for it: “We call it ‘Mother.’”

The organ in the machine

González and Santamaria, medical vice president of the Carlos Simon Foundation, demonstrated how the device might work when I visited the foundation in Valencia, Spain, earlier this month (although it held no organs on that day).

Both are interested in learning more about implantation, the moment at which an embryo attaches itself to the lining of a uterus—essentially, the very first moment of pregnancy.

The foundation’s founder and director, Carlos Simon, believes it’s a sticking point in IVF: Scientists have made many improvements to the technology over the years, but the failure of embryos to implant underlies plenty of unsuccessful IVF cycles, he says. Being able to carefully study how the process works in a real, living organ might give the team a better idea of how to prevent those failures.

a person in gloves stands next to a machine with lots of tubing coming in and out of the metal exteriorJESS HAMZELOUa sheep uterus resting on gauze connected to several tubesJAVIER GONZALES/CARLOS SIMON FOUNDATION

Javier González demonstrates the perfusion machine. A previous iteration of the device kept a sheep’s uterus (right) alive for a day.

The team took inspiration from advances in technologies designed to maintain donated organs for transplantation. In recent years, researchers around the world have created devices that deliver nutrients and filter waste so that organs can survive longer after being removed from donors’ bodies.

The main goal here is to buy time. A human organ might last only a matter of hours outside the body, so a transplant may require frantic preparation for the recipient, sometimes in the middle of the night. With a little more time, doctors could find better donor-patient matches and potentially test the quality of donated organs.

This approach is called normothermic or machine perfusion, and it is already being used clinically for some liver, kidney, and heart transplants.

The team at the Carlos Simon Foundation built a similar machine for uteruses. A blood bag hangs on one side. From there, blood is ferried via plastic tubing to a pump, which functions as the heart. The pump shunts the blood through an oxygenator, which adds oxygen and removes carbon dioxide as the lungs would in a human body.

The blood is warmed and passed through sensors that monitor the levels of glucose and oxygen, along with other factors. It passes through a “kidney” to remove waste. And finally the blood reaches the uterus, hooked up to its own plastic “arteries” and “veins.” The organ itself sits at a tilt, just as in the body, and is kept in a humid environment to stay moist.

Mother’s first uterus

The team first began testing an early prototype of the device with sheep uteruses around four years ago. That meant carting the machine to an animal research center in Zaragoza, around 200 miles away. Over the course of the preliminary study, veterinary surgeons removed the uteruses of six sheep and hooked them up to the machine. They kept each uterus alive for a day, using blood from the same animals.

After the sheep experiments, the researchers carted their machine back to Valencia and modified it to achieve its current incarnation, “Mother.” They started working with a local hospital that performed hysterectomies. And in May last year, they were offered their first human uterus.

The team needed to be quick. “You need to put [the uterus in the machine] within a couple of hours, maximum, of the extraction,” says Santamaria. He and his colleagues also needed to connect the uterus’s blood vessels to the tubing delicately, taking care to avoid any blockages (clotting is a major challenge in organ perfusion). The organ was hooked up to human blood obtained from a blood bank.

It seemed to work—at least temporarily. “We kept it alive for one day,” says Santamaria.

“As a proof of concept, it is impressive,” says Keren Ladin, a bioethicist who has focused on organ transplantation and perfusion at Tufts University. “These are early days.”

It might not sound like much, but 24 hours is a long time for an organ to be out of the body. Maintaining a donated uterus for that long could expand the options for uterus transplant, a fairly new procedure offered to some people who want to be pregnant but don’t have a functional uterus, says Gerald Brandacher, professor of experimental and translational transplant surgery at the Medical University of Innsbruck in Austria.

“It is better than what we currently have, because we have only a couple of hours,” he says. So far, most uterus transplants have been planned operations involving organs from living donors. A technology like this could allow for the use of more organs from deceased donors, he says.

That work is “not in the immediate pipeline” for the team in Spain, says Santamaria. “We are working on other problems.”

Pregnancy in the lab?

Santamaria, González, and their colleagues are more interested in using sustained human uteruses for research.

They’ve mounted a camera to a wall in the corner of the room, pointed at their machine. It allows the team to monitor “Mother” remotely, and to check if any valves disconnect. (That happened once before—a spike in pressure caused the blood bag to come loose, spilling a liter of blood on the floor, Santamaria says.)

They’d like to be able to keep their uteruses alive for around 28 days to study the menstrual cycle and disorders that affect the uterus, like endometriosis and fibroids.

It won’t be easy to maintain a uterus for that long, cautions Brandacher. As far as he knows, no one has been able to maintain a liver for more than seven days. “No studies out there … have shown 30-day survival in a machine perfusion circuit,” he says.

But it’s worth the effort. The team’s main interest is learning more about how embryos implant in the uterine lining at the start of a pregnancy. They hope to be able to test the process in their outside-the-body uteruses.

They won’t be allowed to use human embryos for this, says González—that would cross an ethical boundary. Instead, they plan to use embryo-like structures made from stem cells. The structures closely resemble human embryos but are created in a lab without sperm or eggs.

Simon himself has grander ambitions.

He sees a future in which a machine like “Mother” will be able to fully gestate a human, all the way from embryo to newborn. It could offer a new path to parenthood for people who don’t have a uterus, for example, or who are not able to get pregnant for other reasons.

He appreciates that it sounds futuristic, to say the least. “I don’t know if we will end up having pregnancies inside of the uterus outside of the body, but at least we are ready to understand all the steps to do that,” he says. “You have to start somewhere.”


From MIT Technology Review via this RSS feed

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 17 points 16 hours ago

Great. A womb with a view.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

my surgeon was fast, but iirc my innards were only outards for 12 hours. this is real progress.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Another horrifying potential use of this technology from fiction that hasn't been mentioned yet: constructs from Murderbot Diaries, purpose built corporate owned cyborgs where half their brain is organic and the other half is a DRM saturated computer.

The Windup Girl is also relevant.

Lots of stuff would change dramatically if mass producing organisms derived from humans becomes possible.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I have the audiobook of The Windup Girl, was a messed up universe.

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 5 points 18 hours ago

Murderbot mentioned! I need to continue the series.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Republicans and Incels LOVE this one trick!

[–] artifex@piefed.social 26 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think the incels want the sex part and not necessarily the kids part tho -- this would give you the opposite

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They also want the part where a woman can be controlled by unwanted pregnancy.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but this uterus isn’t in a woman.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Yeah. I wasn’t disagreeing with you.

If anything, I was bolstering your statements against the person who said republicans would love this.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 5 points 23 hours ago

Until they realise somebody needs to get paid to raise the children until they're productive, and that means taxes. Then it's a big no for this tech and they suddenly call it blasphemous

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It's gonna be really funny to watch transphobes try to deal with trans women getting the ability to get pregnant.

[–] compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 20 hours ago

Just wait until the first trans woman has an abortion

[–] Xella@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That'll be the day. I bet they're going to use this exclusively outside of a human body in order to "save the human race" or some shit. Undesirable women will be turned into this.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

It's actually traumatic (not as traumatic obviously) as a partner if you have empathy.

Oh. right...

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

New criterion for womanhood incoming!

Transphobes: Well clearly the ability to bear children isn't enough so...

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

”Doesn’t count unless your wife is in debilitating pain for 3-72 hours while you act like a martyr for sleeping on a chair for the duration“

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 hours ago

Joke's on them, lots of cis women who get induced and get C-section for that reason!

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's actually theoretically possible already. But it would be incredibly dangerous so no one has attempted it.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Only dangerous because the research that was done on it before was burnt by the Nazis.

And now we have new research with actual protocols. There have been a few hundred transplants already, though on cis women; and there have been some trans man pregnancies as well.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Yeah I'm talking about trans women getting pregnant, which is a lot more difficult than those things. It's not clear what the health outcomes of that would be. Likely not good until we develop the protocols and treatments to make it safe. The hormonal changes in pregnancy are fairly complex, and managing that safely for mom and baby is already difficult enough even with cis women.

It would be a wonderful thing if we can figure it out though.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I think this would actually be great in the long term. Trans women having periods. Trans women getting pregnant and having to work through abortions or birth. Pap smears. It makes their life experiences more similar to cis women.

[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 25 points 23 hours ago

A lot of negativity here. Considering that women's health has been understudied in medicine I think this is a good thing.

Also makes me think of Lois McMaster Bujold's uterine replicators. Which, in her story, revolutionize human society, with both good and negative results.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 25 points 23 hours ago

Finally the future we were promised!

[–] artifex@piefed.social 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brave New World, here we come…

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that computers used to be the size of a room (or larger). Now, the device on my wrist — an Apple Watch, series 10 — doesn't seem very powerful, but it's running Apple's watchOS, which is a derivative of macOS, itself based upon UNIX, once upon a time. The chip in my watch is more powerful than the first couple computers I built, for sure — not sure about the last one I built (4th generation Intel Xeon with 16GB RAM and a 3GB Radeon 280 GPU). It can probably do a few things better than that computer could, and it lived in a massive tower.

Medical technology is not the same as consumer computers, but it also gets smaller as technology iterates and improves.

How big does a uterus get, with a human baby inside at 9 months? Bit smaller than a beach ball? You also have the placenta in there, providing nutrients to the baby. You wouldn't be able to provide that with just a uterus. You'd need something else to convert some kind of food energy for the placenta to feed the baby. That's going to take more machinery, which can also get smaller.

I'm not saying they should. Just that they will probably be able to.

The problem is really going to be when they only use eggs from white donors and start up a eugenics program. But science forges ahead without fear of politics, for better or, as is more often the case, worse.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wait until we get pocket uterus' or wrist uterus' and we can have teeny tiny little babies to make smaller microchips!

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Theyre called tamagotchi

[–] sepi@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

But what about a pocket taint? Just the taint by itself.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

It's the next inevitable step

[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Why do I get this terrible feeling that Elon musk is going to try and clone himself?

[–] unnamed1@feddit.org 3 points 11 hours ago

Imagine having 13 kids or whatever and still thinking they are lacking and feeling the need to clone yourself. Sounds like Elon

[–] Adl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

maybe some kind of CW tag would be appropriate here.

Future's made of virtual insanity. 🎶

I'm not a Luddite, just responsibly cautious.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Axolotl tanks here we come!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Anybody ever read Brave New World?

Anyway. No reason.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The machine is technically called PUPER, which stands for “preservation of the uterus in perfusion.” But González’s colleague Xavier Santamaria says the team has adopted a nickname for it: “We call it ‘Mother.’”

As if this wasn’t creepy enough without the nickname. I can appreciate how useful this potentially is for research, but it still feels wrong for a host of reasons.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

yo this is fascinating, this gives a lot of hope for transplants

[–] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Especially if they can achieve their goal of keeping it alive for months.

Right now, we can only safely do it for hours. Potentially months is a massive improvement.

Do you want the Bene Tleilax? Because this is how you get the Bene Tleilax.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Republicans: The perfect woman 🥹

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

“Moisturize me.”

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Don't give fascist America any ideas

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

cw for raw meat please.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 3 points 22 hours ago

DO NOT WANT

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 1 day ago

Cool. Now they can kill women and harvest uteruses.

[–] jambudz@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Axolotl tanks are coming

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Next step, kill women and harvest our reproductive organs so they can grow their clones then get rid of the rest of us while they’re at it.

I truly believe this is a step in the direction of getting rid of women entirely.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 0 points 23 hours ago

At long last, now women can also feel the pain that comes with getting your external bits caught in a jeans’ zipper.