this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
524 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

82940 readers
2741 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

Do magnets disable cameras ?

[–] palmtrees2309@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hear me out : EMP gun from a distance.

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 6 points 2 days ago
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What's the *scratching arm* copper content of these fellas?

[–] Million@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I may be ignorant, but from my experience Boston Dynamics is cool and if they were able to sell these things to the AI guys good for them!

I know these robots are used to do maintenance vhecks on big factories, where a dude can tell it to walk to a valve to look at it through a camera, and i think thats fine.

Instead of having 50 cameras you have one walking one.

[–] barnacul@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I work in big factories and this is a stupid fucking idea.

Scenario 1: you have 6 trained maintenance guys on shift. One of them goes to check out the questionable valve and fixes it because they are trained to do so. The 5 other guys also work on stuff.

Scenario 2: one of the maintenace guys sits in the office because someone needs to coordinate with the robot dogs. They call the person who controls the dogs to go check out the valve. It is broken. A couple hours later they call a maintenace tech to check it out for real. Unfortunately the company can only afford 3 maintenance techs now because of the dogs, and one of the techs is on tech duty to communicate with the dog team. The other two are busy so the incident is recorded in the logs for an engineer to hire a contractor to fix at a total of three times the price, in six months' time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] odama626@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

Black Mirror, here we come.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 161 points 4 days ago (9 children)

These systems are able to navigate complex landscapes on their own, alert authorities about security threats, and can provide around-the-clock video surveillance.

If only there was a cheaper way to provide around-the-clock video surveillance. Alas, we don't have the technology.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 95 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Even if you needed something mobile, it's not like datacenters are exactly complex landscapes.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 112 points 4 days ago (6 children)

They don't need something mobile. They can stick 1000 cameras up for the cost of one of these and have less up keep.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 52 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I was thinking the same thing. For surveillance, can't they just use the iconic Camera on Wall. Or if they want to get really advanced with the surrounding premises: Camera on Pole.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] nshibj@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (6 children)

guarding some of the country's biggest data centers

The country, ah yes the only place that exists on the internet, the almighty one powerful country to rule them all. THE. COUNTRY.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Probably get about two or three lbs of copper out of the motors alone. Still not worth the gas unless you're going to fill up the back of your truck with em though.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 25 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Would be funny to hear about a kid with a slingshot or something taking these out.

[–] palmtrees2309@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe a laser to their lidar eyes will do the trick.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So a robot you can kick over is better than dogs with actual teeth? Its a good thing tech bros are dumb as fuck.

[–] Logical@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well you can't attach a machine gun to a dog with teeth. I mean you can, but it won't hit anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

On the bright side, robot dogs don’t die when the pig they’re assigned to leaves them in a hot car. Also, nobody cares if a robot dog gets shot/stabbed/kicked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

One step closer to a Horizon Zero Dawn future. Just let me live long enough to see the dinobots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

SMASH THE CLANKERS ! Any solid metal rod will do ! Get out there and smash those sorry imitations of "dogs" to pieces !

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

People with good intentions should not hesitate to blast a robot. Just sayin'.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 77 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ah, lovely. I see that one Black Mirror episode is taking another step toward being reality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 55 points 3 days ago

So if we raid a data center, besides RAM we get free robot dogs? Sweet.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Hunting without killing animals 👌

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Anything to not hire people uh

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Thats the funny part. There are human operators on stand by.

The scary part is that we really will be fighting robots for water...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 65 points 4 days ago (18 children)

Imagine destroying those robots as a hobby just to make the big tech lose money

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 2 points 2 days ago

Hunting them for sport must be fun, and there is zero guilt unlike regular hunting ! I bet they are extremely vulnerable to pit traps 😁 just hide the hole under a tarp and watch em fall !

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 22 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Wouldn't it be cheaper to pay vastly more versatile human guards a decent wage to guard those or more of those instead of those robots?

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Basically yea, you're paying a guard at most 45k a year in most places. I highly doubt these fucking things will last 4 years without major maintenance which will probably cost a month or two of a guards wages. So long term it costs far more compared to wages, but when you factor in labour laws and insurance it's probably still cheaper to just hire people.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

do these do any image analysis? what happens when you hold a mirror to them lol

They feel shame and embarrassment like the rest of us.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

the coolest thing about these dogs? you can break them with a directional wireless jamming device.

also known as a .308 Winchester.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dumbest people in charge. Actual dogs are way cheaper. And better at what they do.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

But:

  • That won't get you millions increase in investor funding, which also lets you increase your pay-cheque
  • You need to buy them from actual dog trainers, which are people and will eventually stop selling to you once you either become too evil for them or you murder them
  • They are a supply chain risk as once you eventually piss off the dog trainer by 4x-ing his electricity bills and getting your AI to tell the govt. to shoot his family, he can then bypass the dogs using his smell, because they would be familiar with him.
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's kinda funny how these dogs went from cute and interesting robot developments to tools of the military industrial complex. The people who designed these are disgusting and depraved.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not really. The people who designed these are nerds like us that want to push the boundaries of science. If they don’t do it someone else will.

The people that choose what to apply them too are the ones with poor morals. You could build these things and only sell them to places that use them for monitoring things like they do in dangerous factories these days.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Are they fireproof?

Honestly the cooling system used is the only thing that anyone needs to hit to take an entire data center down.

Without cooling, everything would melt.

Could be that they all use the same default password - easily searchable if true because it’s probably pinging out asking for connections.

Also massive supply chain attack surface due to the 3rd party dependencies.

If someone were to get within WiFi range they could cause a lot of damage to their infrastructure by attacking the supply chain.

It’s really too bad Claude code identified all those 3rd party security holes opening up these data centers to all these cyber threats.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] org@lemmy.org 33 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Think hiding in a big box and walking slowly would trick it?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›