this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
494 points (99.6% liked)

Linux

12862 readers
525 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] motogo@feddit.dk 1 points 2 hours ago

Anti-corruption and anti-money laundering is way more effective when there's no "blackspots". Makes it so much better when you want to follow the money. As a very privacy concerned individual I, I assume that the reason for insisting on this data be given is to fight back on corruption and money laundering. At least this Is what the bank tells me when I challenge them on this. Maybe I'm just naive sitting here in comfortable Scandinavia

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago

something tells me its a surveillance group behind these demands, currently right wing governments along side things like palintir is wanting to feed its AI with the data they acquire from dissidents.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 173 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Payment processors are a blight

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Actually yeah. Completely useless intermediaries just leeching other peoples money.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I understand the sentiment but payments are quite a bit more complex that people tend to realize. For most companies, handling payments directly without an intermediary is far too expensive, complex and risky.

Fuck MasterCard and VISA btw.

Source: I work for a PSP.

[–] InTheNameOfScheddi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

Payment Service Providers sit in between companies (eg webshops) and payment methods/banks/card schemes. So as a webshop, instead of having to integrate with a bank to do transfers or with PayPal, you only integrate with the PSP. A lot simpler to do, and instead of having to chase each individual payment method for your money, the PSP will handle that for you. They can also provide additional services like a unified dispute view, credit management, small loans, etc...

[–] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Payment Service Provider

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Other than Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies, what’s the solution to this problem?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Letting the post office become a bank. Which is an idea that’s been floated for like a century.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago

The post office in our country became a bank, and then the bank-and-post-office was privatized and bought up and now the mail sucks and the former postal bank is investing in the Palestinian genocide (real estate on Palestinian land, weapons research with field tests on Palestinians, etc.).

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How would this work exactly? The post office would send cash around the same way they send letters around, or would they just handle direct bank transfers?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I see. Thanks for the info

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Make it happen and one day later they're arguing who to provide their services too and who not.

[–] SinTan1729@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

We have it in India. I usually prefer them to most banks for savings accounts, or FDs. Their rates are usually much better.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is "the post office" for Europe?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

AFAIK a lot of European countries have an equivalent of the USPS. Though in doing a quick search for this post I learned that Germany doesn’t have a state owned mail service anymore which is weird. Maybe it’s time for the EU to take on that role?

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dutchy here; our national post office has been privatised decades ago (it currently goes by the name of PostNL). I believe most (western) eu countries don't have a national postal service anymore, like there isn't a national phone, tv or internet provider anymore.

[–] mimavox@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Same here in Sweden. Our right wing governments have destroyed everything in the last 30 years.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Our scumbag neoliberals privatized Deutsche Post in the 90s, but Deutsche Post AG is still legally obligated to provide basic mail service.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, most European countries don't have a government postal service. Either it's always been private or it was privatized decades ago. The USPS is fairly uncommon model.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Wellllll, let's make banks fulfil post office duties instead! :)

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

GNU Taler, which is an anonymous (for the sender, not receiver) digital cash.

If the FSFE were to use a bank utilizing that system, the bank would not be able to request the sender's information from them, as any person sending the donation is completely anonymous by design.

You can learn more about it over at !money@slrpnk.net

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the FSFE were to use gnu taller, the taler bank would've probably requested the same information through some other nonstandard channel sooner or later. The traditional electronic money has become like show breed dogs. They are no good without the papers. Especially in europe.

We need to eliminate the banks and the payment gateways from the paymemt process.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If a bank or preferably credit union adopts GNU Taler, they can't realistically expect the receiver of the tokens to know who sent the tokens due go their anonymous nature. A receiver could put an info form before the GNU Taler part, but the sender could just put john doe info there.

It is truly like cash. I know in the US many banks would get weirded out if you try to deposit a large amount if cash and may report it to the IRS, but as long as its reflected in your taxes, then it should be okay.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only trouble is, that's exactly why they would refuse to adopt GNU Taler.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Some banks in Europe are already adopting it, and credit unions would be much more likely to as well.

[–] kaki@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

The non-profits I've donated to usually allow bank transfers and sending cash or checks by mail.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 78 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

You know how sometimes a story seems so completely crazy, that you wonder what detail has been left out? Like… the payment provider just randomly wanted a list of all passwords? What?

Holy shit you weren't kidding

Over the past few months, our former payment provider Nexi S.p.A. (“Nexi”) requested access to private data, which we understood to be specifically the usernames and passwords of our supporters. We have refused this request. All our attempts to clarify Nexi’s request, or to understand how their need for such information was necessary and legal, were met with what we consider to be vague and unsatisfactory explanations relating to a general need for risk analysis.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 10 points 1 day ago

Agree, there's no way this is the whole story. Someone is hiding something. If that isn't the FSFE then I'm guessing that the payment processor set the whole thing up as a flimsy reason for kicking them out with a "justified" cause. As to why, who knows.

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

I think that was an exaggeration. They likely "just" wanted their account names and PII. It was simply not clear, and they never clarified it, which is absurd. Probably because it is illegal to ask, but if they get data willingly, they are out of trouble?

[–] lbfgs@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

Thls ls why crypto was invented

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 33 points 1 day ago

Isn't this the kind of threat that payment processors made to Steam regarding some NSFW games? I believe it was an Australian "grassroot" campaign that led to the latest ban of many Steam (and Itch.io) games, and the threat was payment processors stop working with Steam.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_Shout#2025_Steam_and_Itch.io_game_removals

This is the power they have now, imagine a cashless society..

[–] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In case your client just spins trying to load the content like mine did:

Over the past few months, our former payment provider Nexi S.p.A. (“Nexi”) requested access to private data, which we understood to be specifically the usernames and passwords of our supporters. We have refused this request. All our attempts to clarify Nexi’s request, or to understand how their need for such information was necessary and legal, were met with what we consider to be vague and unsatisfactory explanations relating to a general need for risk analysis. > > Subsequently, we found ourselves unable to receive credit card donations through Nexi’s system. In the afternoon of 10 March, we were further informed that our contract had been cancelled a few days prior on 7 March, due to our supposed failure to meet their deadline to fulfil their request. This deadline was not communicated to us beforehand, despite us having been Nexi’s customer for the past 15 years. This is completely crazy! As 450 supporters are affected, that is a huge amount of donations that were cut off!

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Nexi S.p.A. (“Nexi”) requested access to private data, which we understood to be specifically the usernames and passwords of our supporters. ...relating to a general need for risk analysis.

I think they passed the risk analysis portion. Isn't it more risk if they hand out usernames and passwords? That's insane. They shouldn't even have access to passwords.

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jerboa doesnt support crossposting and neither did lemmy web for me, so no idea how that is supposed to work

https://fsfe.org/news/2026/news-20260316-01.en.html

[–] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

No worries. I use Voyager. I don't think I've ever cross posted, but I think it works. I see others doing it all the time

[–] null@lemmy.org 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Process the fucking payment, payment processor.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

You are legally required to pay us, but we aren't legally required to give you the service you paid for.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

More than 450 current FSFE supporters who use automatic renewal with credit card or direct debit have been affected by Nexi’s actions.

EFSE has only 450 people giving recurring donations (using credit card or direct debit, at least)?! Never mind the payment processor bullshit, why aren't more of y'all donating?

[–] pantherina@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Many more likely use SEPA invoices or direct payments, which seem way better. But I dont know, the FSFE could absolutely use more donators, they are doing very important legal and policy work for free software.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

I'm poor and not European

[–] tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org 2 points 1 day ago

I will start donating to the FSFE when they stop their crusade against RMS.

[–] mouse@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

I still have a checkbook