this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
1313 points (99.0% liked)

Funny

14119 readers
1623 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Big Philomena Cunk energy in that comment.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i fucking loved NFT startups in 2021. it was the definition of easy money. I had like 20 clients like that in 2021 alone and it was the shit. the funniest bit is that literally none of these companies or projects were around by the time 2023 started - all wiped out and most of these entrepreneur bros just moved on to do disposable AI startups instead with equally nothingburger results. what's baffling is that these motherfuckers still manage to raise investments for some bullshit pie in the sky but actual techies with ideas struggle to get a quarter worth of financing even though their ideas actually have legs

[–] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They have the resonating rhetoric, charisma, personal connections, and delusional enthusiasm necessary to wow investors. Wooing investors is a skill unrelated to technical understanding.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

and its fucking annoying that these folks get the best opportunities - in a better world they would've been shoved away in the sales department doing the good deed but nah ain't happening

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Get fucked.

We had this ruining the art world right before AI started taking its shot.

NFTs died miserably.

Now it's AI's turn.

Some artists I know made pretty good money on NFTs for a while.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Today it is worth $155."

LMAO. No.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

Yea ... I agree, it really REALLY isn't worth $155.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I used to think Bitcoin was a ponzi scheme. I still do, dut I used to, too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Blockchain enforced "ownership" pertaining usually to shitty artwork. Was a real fad back in 2021 but thankfully has fizzled out.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

An image in a database tied to an ethereum address.

There's is a 0% chance these rich youtubers actually paid money for it.

[–] drath@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

To be fair, there are active buy offers for that one for ~$5k. The $155 figure is a collection offer, meaning someone is ready to buy anything in that collection, no matter how shitty it is. And, at practically zero liquidity (only one of those ever sot sold after minting), the concept of value becomes meaningless, he could accept the offer and take back $5k, he could list it at something like $20k and it'd likely quickly sell, or he could bullshit one of his rich friends to buy it from him for a million... or he could print that out and jerk it off to it, the therapeutic effect of which might be worth millions for his entertainment business, who knows.

[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I somehow....didn't fall for these?

[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Who with a clear mind and IQ above 0 would fall for that? Seriously!?

In Germany, we have a great saying for such stupid people: “As dumb as a five-meter (~5.5 yard) dirt road.”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 129 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What an indictment of our society that this fuck ass ever had that much money and now has more

[–] Town@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

His net worth is over 2 billion now. It's revolting.

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where are you seeing such a high figure? This article from 2025 says $150 million. I know he has Celsius and wrestling but 2 billion seems like BS

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

I also saw $150 million, which is more than he deserves but it's mostly because of ownership. Wealth snowballs so even if you make terrible life decisions after the initial investments, you usually come out with even more money.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

$155 looks a little high to be honest.

The very idea of NFTs were wild. You don't own a physical image, you own something kind of like a copyright to an image but you don't in fact own the actual copyright. But it's gonna cost you alot of money and somehow make you even more money someday.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You own a sign with a link to the image.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And there isn't even a guarantee that link will work in perpetuity.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Or that it's the only link to the image; you just own one of the links.

[–] khanh@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

Can confirm, I took one look at NFTs back in 2021 and immediately said "that's fucking stupid."

[–] NullPointerException@lemmy.ca 81 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Nah, it’s genius. A fantastic way to laundry money. It’s like buying paintings but you don’t even need to pay someone to appraise it or a good painter with some sort of good technique.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Yeah, but do paintings typically lose almost all of their value? I thought the idea was that the value should either stay the same or go up.

Either way, in this case, it couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (5 children)

The point here is say you are in business with X party but it's illegal. X party can buy an nft worth nothing or generate one. You buy the NFT for the amount of your bill with X party. You've now technically not paid them for whatever illegal thing, instead you bought an nft from them. You could also break this down into multiple NFTs, buying 100 $100 NFTs from various "owners" that don't link back to X party through shell companies, and you've now paid them $10,000 "for pictures of chimps".

NFTs only exist for money laundering and illicit transfers. Once they've been transferred their value no longer matters, the business has been done.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Not Financially Tenable

[–] Bleys@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

no one else going to point out that Logan Paul is somehow not the worst person in that picture

[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For anyone wondering, she's a conservative influencer who worked with BlazeTV, Toilet Paper USA, contributed opinion pieces to RT and, unsurprisingly, has ties to the Russian government.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

More specifically, she and her husband founded tenet media, who ACTUALLY FOR REALS laundered Russian money to shitheads like Tim pool and Dave rubin.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 17 points 2 days ago

Odd, I always thought they were a means to launder your money.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How the hell is it even worth $155?

[–] markkkkkk@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I’m not sure it’s worth $155 cause then it was the bored Ape that was trending but it lost it values drastically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Id probably have bought it as a sticker for 0.50 or a dollar when I was 10

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's like a tax on stupidity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That scam exists because of all the deregulation. With proper regulation all the people pushing NFTs would have had to pay back all they stole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 3 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it was easy to buy, I would pay $5 for this thing, so I could tell the three people in my life that would be amused by my owning it. That's the floor on the market, for this particular one - so it still has a long way to fall.

I'll make you one of these for $5.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I kinda wish NFTs were still somewhat popular, they were such an effective indicator for the dumbest people alive.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

NFTs are actually very interesting tech with a very real use case. However, just like crypto currencies, their actual use case is so boring you'd literally consider falling asleep as someone explained it. As someone who actually learned what NFTs were long before they got big, I knew what once they hit mainstream, I should keep my money as far away from it as humanly possible.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Isn't it worth exactly what the highest bidder will pay? Where would the $155 number come from? Seems like an NFT famously owned by Logan Paul would sell for more than $155 anyway. Not saying he'd make a profit here...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›