Great so the White House pretends Spain agreed and does not punish them and Spain still bans the US from using their bases.
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
552 points (99.8% liked)
Europe
10512 readers
1779 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Who still believes in the WH declarations these days? Go Spain!
To the ALL involved: how about disclosing all the files?
USA does not understand, EU is one marked, you can not stop trade with one country. Can the EU stop trade only with Florida!? Think Trump, think!
Operation Epstein Fury
And they fucking have to stand alone, abandoned by all EU "allies". EU is falling apart and it's not because immigrants or Russian meddling. It's because spineless leaders like Merz and von der Leyen, always looking to do the absolute minimum and never anger anyone. So fucking disappointing.
As a German I am ashamed at the pieces of shit we elect. Or appoint.
Straight up lying about what other governments agree to.
Like, I don't even know what the purpose was here... what did they think, the spanish won't be hearing about it because its in english?
The purpose of this is that right wing news media will only report what Trump said while never mentioning the rebuttal. Now they'll do whatever they want and when they get push back they'll say "yeah but you said we could" and all of his fans will back him up. And since Trump purged most of the senior military that opposed him the military will most likely back him up too. So now if there's an international incident involving the illegal use of US military bases in Spain they can say it was Spain that broke the agreement.
Facts don't matter for these people. They only care about what their dear leader says while everything else is noise or ignored entirely. Essentially, this message isn't for us or Spain, it was for MAGA.
Ah the Spanish, they still only have sticks and stones no way they can receive broadcasts
They're too busy with their siestas, drinking wine and talking very loudly to read international media.
as a Spaniard, I confirm
Right after the conference José Manuel Albares declared "it's siesta time"
And expecting their very own Inquisition.
And I always though nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
That's why you always have to be on alert.
bro thinks he's playing Civ
Honestly I think it's a tried and true shameless asshole business strategy of his or something. You tell everybody you made a deal and brow beat the other party into just going along with it instead of trying to correct history.
It might not work for many people and businesses, but it probably works for a narcissistic trust fund scumbag that was handed a real estate empire and taught strategy by the very man who raised Donald Trump to have the personality he does.
They know that their supporters won't question it further.
Exactly. These comments are not directed at the sane, it's so their supporters don't have to admit that trump loses most of the time.
Well they also tried to do the same with the Venezuela's VP, and that also blew up in their face. My guess is it will just be a thing they do now.
i mean...it works with Netanyahu's speeches in hebrew, for dove-zionists back in the States that only speak english
Trump is dumb enough to believe that Spaniards don't understand English just because he doesn't understand Spanish
They said they're going to cut all trade with Spain over Spain not letting them use bases for these Iran strikes. My guess is someone in the Trump cabinet imports Spanish wine or some shit, and so they need trade with Spain.
Trump says Spain let them do the thing, so trade is back on! Art of the deal, baby!
The only other option is that they did reach an agreement and said agreement allowed Spain to deny its existence. Trump did this with Iran before bombing actually, where he proposed the Iranian government could save face with public statements while complying with his demands. When they refused, he bombed them.
"in four words: No to war."
Before anyone jumps on the translation error, there are four words in the original. "en cuatro palabras: No a la guerra."
Could just translate it "no to the war" instead of writing an explanation.
I can only draw from my French, but I guess "no to war" is the correct translation, as "no to the war" in English would be either wonky or would mean "no to this specific war". But the Spanish wording is more read as "no to war in general", so the translation is more correct.
I can only draw from my French
Est-ce que Duolingo me menti?? Il accepte les deux... (/s)
Anyway, I figured "no to this specific war" was close enough, especially since he was in fact talking in the context of a specific war.
Soit Duolinguo "te ment" (au présent), soit il "t'as menti" (au passé). Mais "me(présent) menti(passé)" c'est pas possible
Noter que l'équivalent première personne pour "t'as" est "m'a", in order to seed confusion among enemy troops
Based on french, I would also support the "no to war in general" hypothesis. I don't have a grammatical reason for this, it's just that this phrasing is most often used for general concepts than specific instances. If they were talking about this war specifically, it would look like "no a esta guerra" or something.
Who knows maybe someone who actually has a clue how spanish works will one day read this thread x)
That looks wonky in English. Nobbling your translations for the sake of people incapable of understanding that words work differently in other languages is like putting “REMOVE FROM BOX BEFORE EATING” on pizza cartons.
I was under the impression that "la" could act as an article as well as helping signify gender. My mistake.
But in that case, if you don't want to "nobble" your translation, why not go for "in [three] words: no to war" instead? Translating the math definitely seems less "wonky" to me than annotating it with a long, awkward explanation.
It is an article
...we need a megathread for all news that start with "White House says", "Trump threatens" constant attention whoring. I just want out of this ride.
Spain continuing to be incredibly based
Oh look, it’s the Trump special!
Just like a few days ago how Iran wanted to “make a deal”
Just let them lie, takes the threat of trade embargo away without having to actually do anything about it.
Ladies and gentlemen, the art of the deal.
Fuck you tRump, europe likes you about as much as that russian midget. Go fuck yourself.
I don't speak Spanish well. The caption on the photo is something like "a child (walks?) past an unexploded Iranian missile in Syria," correct?
Yes, correct.
they probably leaked their agreements with the right wing (PP) and extreme right wing (VOX) parties once they have been couped into power…