Qwel

Looking at the specs, I would guess it is

You can setup a Ventoy USB stick if you want to try multiple options

ublock has filter lists for these things. Doesn't always work but helps a lot.

the nice part is that if you don't ever respond to the popup, they are not allowed to presume you accepted

WHO DOWNVOTED THIS JESUS CHRIST

Looking at the news I would guess American houses are buit mostly out of loaded firerarms coddled together by zipties. And oversized fridges.

They probably gave up on preventing cheat entirely, and are just trying to reduce the amount of cheaters by making cheating as annoying as possible.

I do actually believe them when they say that cheating on Linux can be made significantly easier and more comfortable than on Windows. I think it's a real fundamental issue for Linux, multiplayer games with toxic playerbases can be unplayable due to users being able to do what they want. They would have to make systems to allow for playing in smaller human-moderated servers, or rely purely server-side solutions

It's not proton that is exploited. It's the kernel itself that cannot be monitored by anti-cheats, meaning cheaters could install a modified kernel to mess with the anti-cheat

Is there any country that doesn't work like that?

It's similar in that it has an application launcher at the bottom, a windows-like start menu, and aims to be simple.

Zorin has a modern UI where Mint is more windows-7-ish. They don't have the same file explorer, settings app, app store, generally the core apps are different.

Look they're quite different, it's hard to make a full comparison, just run a Mint .iso in gnome-boxes if you're curious.

People not having as much time to "decide" to go for bad faith is interesting

I wonder if someone made an actual list of observed differences in behavior IRL and online, with the same discussion as input.

I guess people would tend to simply refuse to interact with the discussion, but they would have the same things to say, right? Like, they don't have different opinions online and IRL. If you were giving people as much time and "confidentiality" to think and express their thoughts (which are generally seen as good things), it should look similar. Basically I think the online assholes would also be IRL assholes if you let them talk in similar conditions.

Anyways, there are differences, but I don't see any causes for "don't ever listen to anything due to this"

Oh, why so? Less likely to be a bot?

I would guess you didn't live in Gaza, but you still have an idea of what is happening there. Of course if you did live there, it would likely take precedence over what you read about it.

You don't actually need to take decisions about Gaza, so you could just ignore it. But you will need to take a decision about a cancer you've never lived before, and you will need to to use other people's experiences about it to make that decision.

You are currently living by the "don't put your fingers in the socket" rule, and you (likely) never tried it. You (likely) don't understand why, or how bad it would actually be, but you're following it, and it is a good thing for everyone involved.

Using other people's expressed experience is absolutely necessary for your everyday life, and you will do it even if you don't want to. Figuring out exactly how to deal with the mistakes and contradictions and lies gets complicated, and is a fundamental subject in science

The way the jump instant-triggers when hitting the corners of a block while pressing space feels really bad.

Overall I got used to the rest. I actually like that it's buggy, feels more like the Minecraft I used to play, half-broken but promising