this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
534 points (97.8% liked)

World News

54464 readers
3081 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mojtaba Khamenei, 56, was tapped to assume control of the country by Iran’s Assembly of experts, Iranian International reported Tuesday.

Motjaba is known for a staunch adherence to his father’s hardline conservatism, and has close ties to Iran’s notoriously brutal Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps military body, according to CNN.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rarbg@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago

FTFY: Ayatollah Khamenei’s oldest son elected as ~~supreme leader~~ next target

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 37 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Motjaba is known for a staunch adherence to his father’s hardline conservatism

So all we have managed to accomplish in the last week of bombing Iran is kill a bunch of civilians and get the younger but just as hard line version Ayatollah Khamenei?

Excellent, very good.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It was a knee-jerk response to the Trump-Epstein files scandal...I mean...uhh...I meant to say...they've been planning this for months.

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 0 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

Not everything has to do with Epstein, you know.

Israel saw this as an opportunity to kill parts of the Iranian leadership and couldn't resist. The US just joined in so Trump could win another FIFA peace price.

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

You’re right. Not everything does.

But this war is a distraction from the Epstein files. Operation Epstein Fury.

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We also managed to take out a vast amount of ballistic missiles, their launchers, air defense, aircraft, boats and regime related infrastructure and the whole top 40 in the chain of command.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 5 points 10 hours ago

If it was true they're would not be able to elect a replacent if you thrust american media.

[–] Generica@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's the NY Post. Might as well be a roll of cheap Scott toilet tissue. You know, the kind of paper that scratches your ass up

[–] Dinner@lemmy.zip 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

So same shit, different pile?

[–] DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Hm no kinda worse because now they have a clear reason for nuclear weapons

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago

And someone in leadership who isn't about to die of natural causes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 20 hours ago

that's an odd choice considering the iranian revolutions ideology is founded on anti hereditary succession

i think it's a mistake for them

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 13 points 23 hours ago

The United States of Israel wanted to change the regime to a monarchy, no? Well, mission accomplished, now they can fuck off.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Imagine if Don Jr was the new president after Trump. That's what this is. America is bombing the cities where the reformist (think liberals in america) live. Traditionalists live in the rural areas (like in the US maga lives in the boonies). Their MAGA just elected their Don Jr. No one in the sticks is dying over there.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

I am surprised people responding to this piece of news to be valid information when Iran would make this public when they choose the next leader.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

America and Israel's attack almost certainly snuffed out the rebellion in Iran, especially after they bombed a school full of children.

People aren't going to overthrow the local authorities when a foreign country unilaterally decides to attack their country and even targets their children.

I expect this had the exact opposite effect of what the Trump administration claimed to desire.

Then again, I seriously doubt that the real objective of the Pedo War was ever related to Iran itself.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

well you’re not talking about epstein anymore, so it seems like it did have the effect he desired.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

I used the expression "claimed to desire" for a reason.

What Trump (or, in fact anybody in his administration) says and reality are totally unrelated things which at the best of times are about as related as boats which pass each other in a thick fog.

[–] deepflows@lemmy.today 27 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Yeah, no. Russia really needed gas and oil to be much more expensive globally. That Ukraine war is costly. Also the Trump/Epstein files. Also Israel.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've seen some reporting that claims the US and Israel is bombing leftist opposition in Iran. And arming Kurdish militants. Seems like they just want Iran completely destabilized.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is exactly what they want, but I doubt the Kurds are going to trust them anymore, so the US really has no control over how things settle.

The US is currently operating at the strategic level of a drive-by shooter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t think the US killing civilians drives Iranian rebels back into philosophical alignment with their government, but certainly it’s hard to get a protest together when the US is bombing.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Discontent only turns into Revolution when enough people voice it and act on it, as they feed each other's confidence in changing things eventually turning into a critical mass for change.

An external enemy that attacks for no reason, more so one which is so murderous and immoral that they would mass kill children, will make a lot of people not voice their discontent with the only structure capable of unifying them in defense against the external agreessor, much less act against it.

Then on top of that, that murderous foreign aggressor has actually voiced their the desire for said Revolution.

If before in Iran voicing opposition to the regime might actually inspire others to also voice their own discontent, now it will inspire others to attack that person for doing what that foreign aggressor wants.

So what before was growing into a critical mass for change amongst the general population has now been rolled back into what is most small groups of like-minded extremelly anti-regime individuals surrounded by a general population that sees them as working for a foreign aggressor which is so evil that they blew up a school full of children.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

An exterior threat can have a rally-around-the-flag effect. They hate the administration, but now they see an even bigger threat, a foreign threat. They might not want to rock the boat now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (3 children)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

A leader (or at least one that wants to build a stable base of power) needs their immediate subordinates to believe in their legitimacy. The foundation of power is obedience, and the belief that you have the right to give commands that ought to be obeyed is a very effective mechanism. An election is one way to secure that legitimacy, no matter how foregone the conclusion or how large the body of electors.

Historically, you might look at the Holy Roman Emperors and the prince-electors that (at least formally) chose them. What matters is that some people obey some people who obey some people who ultimately came to the consensus to all obey the same person.

(Of course, that obedience based on legitimacy may have limits, depending on the principles underpinning that legitimacy. If the foundation is god's favour, the impression that a ruler is losing that favour may well threaten his power as well, which is how you get kings pleading with the pope to retract his excommunication: if he doesn't, his vassals might withdraw support.)

So, yes, some circle of people who are commonly accepted to have that power elected him. Nobody said it has to be a fair election, so long as the important people respect its result.

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago

Ankh-Morpork had dallied with many forms of government and had ended up with that form of democracy known as One Man, One Vote. The Patrician was the Man; he had the Vote.

-- Terry Pratchett, Mort

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A great many authoritarian systems throughout history, especially in the ancient world, have had a selection system that formalises compromise between the major power brokers to prevent the whole group being made easy pickings to outsiders by succession struggles.

Primogeniture is not the default because the oldest son often sucks.

The electors here are influential clergy members and high ranking military officials.

[–] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

The assembly of experts choosing the next leader is staffed by only clerics, no military personnel.

[–] The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

The US is probably tracking his bowel movements already. I give him a week

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 35 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Meet the new Boss.

Same as the old Boss.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 193 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Is that the regime change Trump and Netanyahoo wanted?

[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 162 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›