this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
960 points (99.6% liked)

196

5803 readers
1307 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] morto@piefed.social 90 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It wouldn't be much different even for billionaires under 90

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 17 points 6 days ago

Yeah, as far as I'm aware, 100% of them came from at least a middle class family. They start with a fair advantage over the poor still. Most are born to extreme wealth though.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You had to do research for that?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Here's a counter-example that proves the rule:

  • Born in 1992
  • Graduated from MIT in 2014 at 22
  • Joins a proprietary trading firm after graduation
  • Founds a quantitative trading firm in 2017 at age 25
  • Founds a cryptocurrency exchange in 2019 at 27
  • On the 2021 Forbes "30 under 30" list at 29, and is recognized as a billionaire
  • Found guilty of wire fraud and conspiracy in 2023
  • Currently in prison

Sam Bankman-Fried got to $1b before 30, and he didn't inherit his wealth (but he certainly started with a lot more wealth than most people). But, the way he managed to hit $1b before 30 was via massive fraud. Without massive fraud, I don't know how you go from an entry level job at 22 to $1b just 8 years later.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 43 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It still weird me out that there are only something like 600 billionaires in the US. This seems like such a solvable problem.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 24 points 6 days ago (3 children)

We could easily solve that with just a single guillotine.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At 5 minutes per execution, it could be done in just over 2 days. If you wanted to ensure that nobody missed any of the event and limited it to 8 hours per day, you could get it done in 1 week.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

You could do it even faster, just assemble 6 guillotines. Then you could execute 72 per hour instead of 12. You'd then be done in 8 hours and 20 minutes.

Special holiday!

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Dude, you are living in the past. Band saw and conveyor belt.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hold on. Who'd build and own the band saw and conveyor belt?

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

You got any plans this weekend?

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm no dude, but yes, that sounds absolutely revolutionary. Industrial oligarch eliminationmaxxing!

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

if we did one per minute, we are looking at about 10 hours of solid thwacks. give or take. im sure we could shave that down by a few seconds per, they are a physically weak people on average. so i imagine we could get it done in half the time if we shave it to 30 seconds per billionaire. and have them all lined up. ready to go.

thats an afternoon. about 5 hours at 30 seconds a pop.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

I appreciate the Silcon Valley-esque efficiency calculation but honestly that's not a super high requirement. 5 hours, 10 hours, a week, whatever. No need to speed run this thing. Honestly if we were good in a year I'd be thrilled.

We’ll make it a speed run event sort of thing. GDQ: Guillotines Done Quick.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Guillotine blades get dull. And they're kind of heavy.

So to keep things moving I motion that we set up half a dozen of them. Each one would handle 100 people, which would still absolutely wreck the blade. But that's a price I'm willing to pay.

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'll donate a blade to lower any cost concerns.

Some rope too.

Anyone else?

Anyone have some trees they're willing to have milled for the frame?

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Sure, I have some wood ready here.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago

Or, hear me out:

Woodchipper.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hunger games, billionaire edition, the winner gets a quick death.

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 5 points 5 days ago

Imagine if they dropped all their loot upon death, i would love to see the lootsplosion of money, gems, deeds to property, stock folios and legendary/epic rarity artworks & artifacts.

Unfortunately very small EXP rewards as they never levelled up through the grind.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 42 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm fine with taxing the ever-loving shit out of their estates. If the heir class are not fine with that, we can go to OP's suggestion.

History would seem to suggest they are not fine with being taxed as a general concept

[–] tackleberry@thelemmy.club 24 points 6 days ago

The system we created ensured the wealth is concentrated among a few of us, has always been this way even when monarchs ruled a majority of our population.

in other news, grass is green

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago

The percentage of sociopaths involved with creating a society should never be greater than zero.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It's against most rules for advocating against certain things, however for educational purposes only I would suggest a slow roast with a barbeque glaze, and if you'd like to put in some effort an apple and sage stuffing could really help bring some flavours out (be sure to remove that giant stick they all have up their arse first, though).

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago

That stick is for the rotisserie!

Remember BBQ derives from French

"barbe à cul" = "beard to butt"

[–] confused_polarbear@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 days ago

I am a billionaire… I have 1 billion microplastics in my body

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago

Their parents created so much value for humanity that it overflows to their children.

(capitalist ideologues really believe this)

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wonder what the suggestion may be.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think it involves cutting edge technology.

[–] WillStealYourUsername@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Probably a headless sever as well!

edit: whoops, *server

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I have a suggestion, we should make billionaires pay……their fair share of taxes.

[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago

It’s not just this, we need to end all means of them living off borrowed debt. If you own that much money, there is no reason to be borrowing anything from anyone you have more money than

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

not that bs 1% or 2%, at least 50%

[–] parzival@lemmy.org 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I prefer an income cap, 1 million a year, at a standard tax percentage, then all income above 1mil is taxed 100%. Capital gains are treated as income. Any profit is.

But trading value that has already been taxed is not counted as income. So selling a 10mil house for 11mil is only taxed 1mil, as the 10mil was already taxed as income.

Same for corps, but with a 10mil profit cap a year.

The low cap discourages businesses from merging into massive conglomerates that control too much of anything.

We don't actually need national or international businesses.

Of course I also approve of making for-profits outright illegal. So the cap wouldn't even be relevant for businesses anyway, as they'd all be public services, and any 'profits' they made a year would just be put towards more, or better services, or improved employee compensation packages, or subsidizing costs in the future until prices balance back out, or refunds (all depending on the business/industry).

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

1 million a year is ridiculous, you can already accumulate wealth if you have that much. And that defeats it already. What you want is an equitable society, in where social ownership is the norm. Credit unions, time banks, for example.

I think it's much more sane to have a max of what ordinary salaries in worker-owned co-ops top out at. A manager at for example Mondragon, a federation of worker-owned co-ops, may earn no more than five times the minimum of their own workers.

Assuming you'd need €40,000 a year in the poorest US states as a living wage, that yields €200,000 a year there.

In Vietnam, this would be about €4,750 a year., and thus € 23,750 for the richest.

In Switzerland, that might be €60,000 a year and therefore €300,000.


The issue with money is also, it can be accumulable, and inherently fosters inequality. Time banks might be an alternative, but they ultimately rend into wage labour by a different name. An idea might be a form of decentralised Community Exchange System, which is essentially a mutual aid system that fosters to give-it-forward (and thus to share).

[–] PillowD@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

1/2 of all the rich are rich because they were born rich. I lost where I found that statistic though.

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

It's around 75% in Germany. Guess when those fortunes were made.

No shit. And all them have had funds and investments made in their names the moment they were born.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 3 points 5 days ago

I don't know if forcefem will help but I guess it'll at least be good for diversity

[–] doug@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

How do you talk the winner of a Monopoly game into not playing the game anymore and letting us move onto a cooperative game?

Like my god man, Monopoly isn’t even that good of a game; we all know by now it was created to lampoon capitalism. The game sucks. Stop touting your winnings. You are ruining game night with this!

And now you’re having your kids brag about your winnings and holding game night hostage?

Bruh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

100% estate tax over 1 million.

Inherited wealth is fundamentally against American values of individualism and self-made hard work.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

A suggestion for lunch, perhaps?

load more comments
view more: next ›