this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
311 points (98.1% liked)

politics

28473 readers
1951 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, ushered in under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, were unlawfully imposed

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, ushered in under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, were unlawfully imposed. Trump had used the act to charge huge levies on countries, including 50% on India, which was later reduced, and 34% on China.

By Friday night, the president posted on Truth Social that he signed an executive order enabling him to bypass Congress and impose a 10% tax on imports from around the world. “It is my Great Honor to have just signed, from the Oval Office, a Global 10% Tariff on all Countries, which will be effective almost immediately,” Trump wrote.

Less than 24 hours later, Trump said he was bumping up the tariffs to 15% “based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued yesterday.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Lol, I have a real question, does anything actually happen when Trump makes these outlandish terrif statement?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

And just like that trump finally realized he is not the king of the world. He's the titanic.

[–] alonsohmtz@feddit.uk 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine if he was this enthusiastic about raising taxes on the people robbing the working class.

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

Why would he tax his "friends" that have him millions so he doesn't?

[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 28 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So, basically, starving the peeps of the US, while, every other country, moves out of the US trade.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

It'll boost domestic production!! /s

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago

WHAT? An extra 15% tariff on all this stuff that I don't export to america!!! Oh no, oh dear!

Anyways a real man would've put a 1111% tariff on everything. Once again the orange child rapist takes the easy way out!!!

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 23 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

So did he just blow up all of those trade deals he made to spite the SC, or are all those countries exempt from the 15%? Based on the UK response quoted in the article, it seems they have similar questions...

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 hours ago

No one knows. This entire thing is a temper tantrum.

He's apparently applying these tariffs under a different law than the one they used previously, which does explicitly allow the president to apply temporary (150 days) tariffs of up to 15%. So you would assume this is meant to replace the tariffs the SC struck down.

But he's also stated that the previous tariffs are going to stay in effect, just under a different legal theory. So in his mind, it's possible that he thinks this 15% is on top of the existing amounts, and he's literally just tariffing the whole world harder because he's mad about a decision by his judiciary.

Then again, maybe he's just a dementia-ridden old idiot who can't keep his own bullshit straight for more than 30 seconds.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago

He started as a halfwit, and dementia has diminished that. Don't expect reason or sense. It's all reaction to being told no.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 29 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Ya'll Americans are cooked. A national sales tax that a crazy bastard will steal for himself and you don't have guns to do anything about it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 37 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Supreme Court: your tariffs are illegal

Orange Jackass: fine, I'll impose different tariffs and I'll make them worse just to spite you

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

"All new tariffs with blackjack and ~~hookers~~little kiddies!"

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 25 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Hey Google, define: racket

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 14 hours ago

For real lol, this is garden variety extortion of the "nice place ya got here..." flavor. Even the dumbest criminals alive know this one.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 120 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

He is, for some stupid fucking reason, allowed to impose tarrifs for 150 days.

Then it goes to congress to vote on whether to keep them, and they likely won't.

What a fucking asshole

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

and they likely won’t.

You mean the same Republican-dominated congress that has basically given him handjobs every time he breaks a fucking law and does something that is actually under the direction of congress? The same Republican-dominated congress that has essentially abdicated any responsibility to govern at all? I'm skeptical, but I hope you're right.

What a fucking asshole

For real, this is another mask-off moment. He had played up the tariffs as a game to push other countries around, but clearly and literally the only reason he is doing this is because he's pissed off at the Supreme Court. It has fuck-all to do with other countries because it's the same rate, worldwide, with no room for negotiations. He's supposed to be this great negotiator of trade deals with other countries, yet he's blowing up every single potential trade deal with a flat 15% worldwide because he's pissed off at people in his own government.

If people can't tell that he doesn't give a flying fuck about anything except pushing people around, doesn't matter who or about what, they're fucking idiots. He's just a cruel fucking asshole, like you said.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

If people can't tell that he doesn't give a flying fuck about anything except pushing people around, doesn't matter who or about what, they're fucking idiots.

I've been spending more time on Facebook, to get sort of a bead on the general consensus. Even accounting for bots, there are a lot of fucking idiots in this country.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 84 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Just hurry the fuck up and die already. Jesus Christ.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Trying to imagine if things would be better under Vance...

[–] dizzle18@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago

I’m just looking for a win here - however small it may be.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The couch fucker fucks couches, I think we can all agree on that...but he absolutely must be less of an imbecile than the orange child fucker, surely?

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Nah Vance 100% is going to be doing shady shit and making a lot of unethical deals to push through executive orders and influence legislation to benefit his benefactors.

If the GOP honestly thought Vance would be better they'd be trying to force trump out by now so Vance can do damage control for the midterms. They know the vice pedophile is just as bad as the pedophile in chief so they won't do anything. Or worse, the GOP is so weak and divided now they don't have the votes to do anything without the magats and they've burned every bipartisan bridge down to the waterline.

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 6 points 13 hours ago

Clots and prayers.

load more comments (5 replies)

Diaper Don taxing Americans to funnel the money to his board of peace to give to his children in order to build a riviera resort in Gaza.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 25 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Who is going to actually enforce these?

What if people just refuse to collect anything, whether it's his 10 or 15 percent?

And tell anyone asking questions to take it up with the Supremes.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 38 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

This is Trump's "power move".

We know it's illegal. He knows it's illegal. He wants everyone to know that he knows it's illegal, and he'll do it anyway. What are you gonna do? Yell at him?

He will continue to escalate, he takes great delight in "sticking it" to anyone who disagrees with him. There is no line that he won't cross.

He takes even more delight in "sticking it" to people who AGREE with him. As a rapist, he rapes anybody he can any way he can.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

I think it's kind of Legal? Smoot -Hawley from 1934-ish was never taken off the books. I cant remember if that's the one he's using for this, but it's like that. There's a never-used vestigial law that lets him do up to 15% for 150 days.

As much of a known-destroyer of America he is, this is Congress failing to do it's bare minimum job of holding the purse strings. They could stop him tomorrow and we would be better off if everyone realized thst

Edit: this one isn't smoot-hawley (1930), sorry. Trade act of 1974. 15%, 150 days and a lot of exemptions under section 122. Congress should still do it job

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Please keep it up Trump. We need more time to be in forced diversification from the US.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Fun fact, in Canada our total exports have actually been going up, including our total exports to the US. But as a preventage of our exports, exports to the US have shrunk because our exports to the rest of the world have grown faster.

We should send Trump a gift basket.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Prices are going to increase again!

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Mutherfucker was counting on tariffs to offset government revenue after he cut taxes on himself and all his wealthy friends. Which is exactly what made them illegal. What does he think this next round is going to accomplish?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 28 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

He also needs that revenue to personally enrich himself from taxpayer money. He gave himself $10 billion of taxpayer money for creating his Board of "peace".

The population of the USA as of Feb 2026 is 342.3 million people. This means that trump personally took $29.21 from every single American living today (including newborn children and aging senior citizens) and put that money in his personal bank account.

Its things like this that I cannot understand how poverty stricken trump supporters are still okay with him and his actions.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›