News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Funny how our media always fails to mention Israel
"Epstein ran a honeypot for former Ottoman Empire territories" is probably the best we'd get.
Oh my, so the Trump Kompromot is real!
starting to sound like a hooker piss video is the least offensive thing he might have done, considering that'd be atleast somewhat consensual right?
Doubt it. There's no way to piss would've wanted to touch him.
On one hand this sounds plausible, but on the other the article cites the Daily Mail, which is far as I'm concerned isn't the most credible source of factual information. I'll hold my judgement until this is corroborated by more reliable sources.
Wasn't Epstein with Mossad?
Now confirmed
How does this square with his Israeli ties?
Sounds like homeslice was playing every angle to me… selling secrets to the Israeli government on the side, working for the oligarchs as his main gig, and boffing Maxi-max just for fun. Truly a multitasker of the lowest order.
Fuck me… I sound mad as a hatter. Happy Sunday y’all. God bless America 🪨🇺🇸🦅
He was not the spider in the middle of the web pulling the strings. He had people above him.
I mean… dude might have just liked bony MILFs, but IMHO it still takes an above average juggler to keep that many huge balls in the air 😉
selling secrets to the Israeli government on the side
I don't think it was on the side. The Israelis, the Brits, and the Americans were his primary clientele.
Bob Barr's father - one of the OG CIA guys under Dulles - was the guy who recruited him out of school. And Robert Maxwell was deep in with MI5 when he started seeing Ghislaine.
I was reading an article recently mentioning how Russia keeps tabs on its Jewish population through some Israeli org. Lemme go find it.
Edit: Hmmm can’t find it again. Might be in my search history when I get home. But there was a clear link between Russia and Israeli intelligence.
Archive link to the Daily Mail article this links to: http://archive.today/2026.02.01-193555/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15516349/Epsteins-sex-empire-KGB-honeytrap-Paedophile-financier-Putin-Russian-girls.html
Still don't see photos of incriminating email?
I am shocked. Shocked, I tell you. Truly, nobody could have seen this coming, despite copious evidence going back decades.

I miss Bernie.
I miss Bernie Mac.
websites with anti-fake sections don't smell reputable to me
edit: i think i'm quibbling over semantics. i'd call it rus-prop or something, but ask 5 interpreters for the same thing interpreted and you'll get 18 different interpretations.
It's a Ukrainian government outlet. So definitely keen to highlight anything negative about Russia.
gotcha i think it might be a translation issue then?
Can you expand on this? What does "anti-fake" mean to you, what does it mean to them? Is this something a lot of news outlets have? Is this the only one? I've never heard of this and I'm confused.
See I'm confused by it too. I clicked on the link and there's an anti fake section. Dude says it's Ukrainian gov so I'll give it a grain of salt but I'm not sure.
The section is more visible on desktop than mobile, that may be the thing
The articles under the "anti-fake" heading seem to mostly be about illuminating and countering Russian propaganda efforts, Russian disinformation campaigns, Russian media subversion, etc.
"Anti-fake" is a term that has apparently been applied to official legislative efforts to counter propaganda, disinfo, and media subversion around the world. I hadn't heard the term before, but I'm not seeing anything inherently suspect about it, under the circumstances.
Maybe it's just an appropriate response to the times.
Why?
Well, aside from the huge "do not pay attention to the man behind the curtain" that this entire article reeks of? freakin daily mail source. I can name no other news service that has it
Like this one? https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/
~~is that how they spell fact check in ukraini wow. because reuters' section is completely different.~~
semantic quibbling. retracted.
"huh I guess you can just buy a Fidel Castro hat?"
I keep seeing this story but haven't seen any supporting documents.
Fishy