this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
825 points (94.9% liked)

196

19037 readers
190 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Just in case anyone doesn't know:

J.K. Rowling uses personal wealth to fund anti-trans org

J.K. Rowling is using her wealth attained from the Harry Potter series to create an organization dedicated to removing transgender people's rights "in the workplace, in public life, and in protected female spaces.”

You can "seperate the art from the artist", but can't seperate the Harry Potter royalties from the anti-trans funding.

Don't forget that she also has publicly said that she considers consumption of Harry Potter media as support for her political ideology. She herself literally made it a political stance.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 122 points 6 days ago (5 children)

There's a real dark irony in a book about a young boy quite literally coming out of the closet to discover his true self written by a woman who might as well be a Dursley.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 42 points 6 days ago (16 children)

Harry Potter has no true self to discover. From the first to the last page of this pile of rags he is a wizarding Mary Sue with near-infinite privilege and the personality of an oyster. The story opens with "yer a wizard" in the first 50 pages and that's the end of his character arc. From then on he's a mere vessel for the reader to experience the world and the author to move the plot along.

.... As a matter of fact, what even is the biggest character arc in that story? I don't remember much, but Neville and Hermione have a glowup and Harry's uncle dies or something? And the weasleys open a shop? I certainly don't recall anything that lends credence to the idea that Rowling even believes that either individual people or societies are capable of profound change. The story begins and ends basically in the exact same place except the characters are 10ish years older.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 days ago

And then he grows up to become… a cop.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

The irony disappears slightly when the whole slave liberation arc was literally Confederate propaganda that was so distasteful and irrelevant to the plot, it was cut from the movies.

The house elves love being slaves. It's the natural order of things.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago (6 children)

The real dark irony is Jo saying they probably would have transitioned when they were younger if they were aware of gender expression.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 6 days ago

Write what you know.

[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 6 days ago

At least it's not more explicit. It's not like there's some potion that lets you change your physical appearance at will that is even capable of turning you into a furry. Or a type of witch/wizard whose special ability is to change their appearance at will, as shown by a slightly androgynous woman who regularly changes her appearance based on how she's feeling in the moment.

[–] 2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

People seemed to have no trouble dropping Gaiman after his horrendous behavior came to light, but even suggest people drop their beloved nostalgia books and it's all "but my blorbo! JK bad I guess, but I like my blorbo!".

The sad part is that the HP-verse is so clearly not for us -- that is, not for anyone besides straight white liberal Christians. The stereotypes, the handwaves, the defense of the status quo. But people choose to engage with and perpetuate this media anyway.

People would rather just enjoy the blorbo than take a stand against what it represents/supports. Comfort is "easier" than tension.

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

My Christian mom didn't let us watch Harry Potter because our church said it was evil. I guess it's not for Christians either, though I think that has changed and it's fine now.

[–] 2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I forgot about that satanic panic stuff around HP. Maybe those xtians feel more comfortable now knowing she hates the same people they do.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nah, that was just boomer panic and the moms now are millennials that read harry potter.

As a millennial I'm dying 😭. I feel like many of us really split between "comfy cozy uwu" and jaded cynicism

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Rocky Horror is a bit better than Harry Potter. DON'T dream it, be it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

what about potter puppet pals. can we still watch that?

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you pirate it, but honestly I don't think it's worth bothering. Harry Potter isn't even original it's not worth watching it or anything else part of it even if you pirate it.

it’s not worth watching it

i mean i love alan rickman but yeah those movies were awful

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 days ago
[–] goodboyjojo@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Trans rights and stuff

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (8 children)

As much as the author sucks, I enjoy the series too much to throw it away :/

[–] Nikki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 6 days ago (2 children)

pirate the media and dont give it exposure then :) any dollar given to that franchise is a dollar spent to harm trans people

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It harms much more than just trans people. Firstly transphobes think even the slightest form of gender-noncomformity is transgenderism, secondly many of those TERF orgs also oppose other things (wondering if Collective Shout got any money from her, but probably she already blames porn for trans people).

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

transgenderism

Forgive me if I've been mislead, but from what I understand "transgenderism" is a term used by transphobes to diminish a legitimate phenomenon, implying it is a belief or fad.

Still upvoted for contributing to the discussion and for supporting an alien in his search for the universe's best cup of coffee.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know, that's why I used that word in that context. They don't care, they just see someone not extremely masculine or feminine, then think they must be trans. I got accused of "formerly having 'rapid onset gender dysphoria'", because I used to have long hair for metal reasons.

Speaking from experience as well, ain't nothing "rapid onset" about cultivating a properly metal head of hair.

I do appreciate the clarification though!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago

I consume it purely through fanfiction and AO3.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

YAaaarrr, we be enjoying content from slimey, bilge-bucket creators without spending a single doubloon on their barnacle-covered arses. 🏴‍☠️

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 6 days ago (3 children)

as a transfem academic who enjoyed HPMoR, I dislike JKR's Harry Potter series because it's poorly written and is not critical enough of the ethical problems it contains

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Oh you mean the fascistic nightmare world where it turns out the only problem is bad actors, not the fact that it's systemically rotten to the core?

Motherfucker becomes a cop ffs

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It isn't critical of its ethical problems at all. It mostly doesn't even acknowledge them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

outside of nostalgia which is hard to quantify what is the appeal compared to thousands of better series in the genre? Its not just written by a bigoted monster who uses her platform for harming others its filled with lackluster world building and empty characters.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›