this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
1426 points (99.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

10400 readers
2281 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 164 points 5 days ago (11 children)

I work in this space and I'm appalled at how much targeted ads make my company.

Every smart person I know is using adblocking too. So is there's like a percentage of people who eats ads all day and open their wallets up?

[–] hesh@quokk.au 151 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Yes, most people. Adblockers are used by a minority.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (2 children)

An unfortunate truth.

Some people justify it by stating that they keep ads because they want to support the websites, but don't know that at the very least they should be blocking trackers and 3rd party cookies

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Even then the proper way to do that would be to Adblock and then whitelist sites you support and know don’t have turbo intrusive ads

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

they want to support the websites

Are these people actually clicking on the ads and making purchases through them? Because if all they’re doing is letting the ads clutter space, but not interacting with them, does that really support the site at all?

Someone on here some weeks ago had a beef with me saying I skip passed promo content in YouTube videos. They said something about wanting to support the videomakers. K, but if I’m not in the market for a new mattress (as an example of an ad I sometimes hear), it doesn’t make sense for me to listen to the sponsored mattress read-through. If I don’t make a purchase with the YouTuber’s promo code, then what’s the difference if I skip a couple minutes ahead? Do I owe a video “respect” by listening anyway? And if for some reason the advertiser cares more about me listening to their spiel than about me actually making a purchase, well, that’s silly and sucks for them.

There are some things advertised that I’m never going to buy no matter how much they’re shown to me. Meal kits, gambling sites, men’s boxers, these are all things I’ve seen countless sponsored ad placements mid-video for, and they are all things I don’t use and can’t see myself using. Yet the ads persist.

So I will continue skipping.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] EvilFonzy@lemmy.world 60 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

They absolutely are. Everything I got from my family this past Christmas was slop from the TikTok shop. They just clicked the first ad they saw and bought whatever. I even got two of the same item because my brother didn't realize he clicked two ads for the same thing. I've been calling it Dropshipmas.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh shit I forgot all about this! After the holidays, everyone in the office was talking about all the garbage they got, and most of them were talking about how many sales/deals they got off of Tiktok.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 23 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I showed my sister ad block and she was like why would i want to block ads. She said she has her algo dialed in and the ads just show her products she probably wants to buy.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 26 points 4 days ago

That hurts my brain to hear, oh my!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

You think that's an obscene amount of money? The intermediary services that collect, collate, aggregate, etc. that same data in the first place before selling it to companies like your employer? That's where the insane money is. That's the long game. 🤢🥲

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] djdarren@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ads Georg, who lives in a cave and looks at adverts 17.7 billion times a day is an outlier and should not be counted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 17 points 4 days ago

There are enough stories about somebody installing a pi-hole and a family member getting angry because now the ads for all the pretty things are gone.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Toribor@corndog.social 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

ICE is using Palantir data to target neighborhoods, which is purchased directly from "advertising" data brokers. So "advertising" is only part of the story. It's always been about delivering a surveillance state, it's just not evenly distributed.

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think the websites all started thinking "I'll harvest data for the inevitable surveillance state"

Google actually started with great intentions and hoped to translate the data into revenue via "normal" ads

But... Dogy ass holes paid better than ads, and, like most companies, whenever they get successful/big enough, everything goes out the window in favour of profits

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Knowledge is power" is an expression at least hundreds of years old. Whether these data collectors were specifically thinking of adverts or not, they realised that this information had value, and so they collected it. I don't think we can know the true motivations of the data collectors and brokers, but we can know that there is (and always has been) a market for data.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I think it was proctor gamble that zeroed out their $200 million yearly adtech spend and saw zero impact to their sales from it. There's a good possibility we're making everything terrible just so that Zuckerberg and friends can keep getting richer to nobody else's actual benefit.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I dare say there's companies that benefit from it, but P&G is one of those companies that exist purely on creatures of habit buying the same big branded boxes every month, because they haven't fallen quite far enough in life to consider supermarket-brand products.

In much the same way as nobody ever got fired for buying IBM, no clueless husband ever got told off for bringing home P&G branded fanny pads.

[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A targeted ad consists of showing you what you just bought from the same exact website you just got it from.

Like, it's just a scam towards the businesses at this point and a waste of my time and bandwidth.

[–] Overshoot2648@lemmy.today 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Amazon: I see you just bought one coat rack; would you like to start your coat rack collection with these other coat racks?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

i think advertising purposes are just a front. They use it for something, but ads is just an afterthought/excuse for public.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I find it so funny how I use Spotify daily*, and the account is linked** to my google account that I use a lot, and in the past I made sure to downvote any ads that don’t fit my interests at all, so basically giving as much aminition to give some good targeted ads to me.

Turns out, after all that, I get rubbish collection ads, face mask ads and wastewater management ads, even though I have truly never thought about any of those nor have shown interest in them, AND I’ve shown tons of interest in only technology.

Asterisks(*) - I use the iOS mobile app, so I can’t really block ads unfortunately, even though I’d love to :/

(**) - I made the google and Spotify accounts when I was in my early teens, so I didn’t really know or care about digital footprint or tracking, so if I was able to go back, I would’ve at the very least gotten multiple google accounts to sandbox my activities. But hey, better late than never I guess!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Everyone likes to think the ads don't work.

The ads absolutely work.

They work on you as well.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 22 points 4 days ago (5 children)

People: Ads don't work

Also people: Everyone knows what Raid Shadow Legends is

I know what it is, but I cringe at ads and am reluctant to buy anything that has been advertized to me

(Although this is nowhere near the behaviour of the average person, allegedly autism makes ads less effective because we are rational)

I should make a formal "The List" of products not to buy and put advertizers who get past my adblocking there

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Thorry@feddit.org 50 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

The "algorithms" are also dumb as fuck. For example on a large retailer site you spend a couple of hours browsing for a particular kind of item. You are comparing different kinds, looking up reviews and issues, watching YouTube videos about them. And finally you pull the trigger and but the thing. Then for the next 3 months that site (and others that picked up on the research) will go: Hey here are some more of that thing you like, you really liked it right? Would you like to compare some more items? Uhm no, I actually bought said thing, you made the sale. All of that "targeted" advertisement is just wasted, I have zero interest anymore since the need has been filled.

It's either that or stuff I can't afford (like memory or graphic cards) or really weird stuff I have no idea why it's being shown to me. Sometimes very alarmingly so. Just recently I got an ad that said "Popular in your region" and it was for illegal Nazi dogwhistle flags, "self defense knifes", baseball bats and tracksuits. That's a bit scary. On the other hand the same site gave me an ad for an "easy to conceal" blowjob machine sex toy. Like holy shit what kind of people are living in my region?

Targeted ads have been terrible for as long as I can remember. I don't think I ever bought anything through an ad or hardly ever even clicked on them. Only time I click on them is because the site and my adblocker are fighting and when I try to click somewhere on the page, it inserts an ad the last millisecond, shifts the entire page so I accidentally click on it.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Amazon thought I was a toilet seat collector for 3-6 months after I bought a 3-pack. No amount of not clicking on those promoted items could convince them otherwise.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BananaChips@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

One of the parts that gets me is there is a good opportunity for more sales there (if that should happen is another debate I don't have the energy for). A few years ago I bought an electric kettle. So cue months of ads for electric kettles. It's a kettle, you only need one. Now if I had been shown different teas or coffees, stuff I would use the kettle to make, they would have absolutely hooked me easily. I had a new toy, I was excited to use it, I would have loved trying new teas with it. I still did, but they were all ones I chose.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 14 points 4 days ago

Yup! Bought an android phone on Amazon. I got a bunch of ads for phones or incompatible accessories. Amazon... You know I bought a android phone, why are you selling me a lightning cable? You know it was a pixel phone, why are you selling me a phone case for a Samsung s series phone?

I'll piss off a bunch of lemmy users with this but... I don't mind ads. I hate useless ads. As you said, ads about teas or coffees would of been useful for you. 99% of the time if I buy something I don't need more of that, maybe some associated stuff but not that. If I buy a video card yesterday I don't need another one. Sell me the latest games. Sell me da monitor with high fps/resolution to show off what the video card can do. I buy a clothes washer, I don't need another one. Sell me detergent. Sell me fabric softener.

How have all the advertising companies missed this?

I bought a used school bus on eBay a few years ago (to turn into a skoolie) and since then I've been bombarded with ads for used school buses. I can assure anyone interested that one is more than enough. Yes, there are school districts and companies that maintain large fleets of school buses, but they do not buy them on fucking eBay.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 60 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (9 children)

I think it's different if you consider ads as a way to maintain the status quo.

Like, there's an ad I keep seeing on TV where 25 or 6 to 4 by Chicago plays as parents struggle to keep up with the parenting responsibilities of their toddlers. It's an ad for Amazon. And thank god for Amazon for being available to help these parents.

And like...everybody knows about Amazon. Nobody is going to suddenly sign up for a Prime account after seeing this ad. However, parents or expecting parents who already have Prime accounts are going to relate to the people in the ad and not even consider other options for their parenting needs.

Maybe a very specific example, and their are certainly ads just telling you to buy chicken nuggets, but I'm seeing it more and more.

Edit: Or hell, look at detergents. Do you really think Tide has innovated anything in the past 30 years?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah like McD reminding you about their big Mac and fries. They know you know about it but they want to think about food because you might be slightly hungry and could eat. They are not ads but subliminal messages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's about being in your mind-space, even days later in the shop. Which works 50/50 on some people and not at all on the others. But that's good enough to bother all of humanity i guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I lived in a country where people don't speak English. There's a sizable expat community of English speaking workers there. The ad targeting was so useless that I was constantly shown ads in a language I couldn't understand. This was on an Android phone where everything was set to English. With every single interaction I with any app or web page I was broadcasting the language I know, and yet they couldn't figure even that absolutely critical detail out.

This targeting was so bad that an old fashioned newspaper ad printed in ink next to a story would have been more effective. At least a publisher is going to put English ads in an English newspaper, German ads in a German newspaper, etc.

If the ad companies can't even figure out the language(s) that their targets understand, their knowledge of their target must be essentially zero.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

when i used apps with targeted ads, amongst generic type of stuff i also used to get two polar opposites of ads:

  1. ah, we see you're in poland and use english a lot, want to learn english?

  2. ah, we see you're in poland and use english a lot, we can help you get your immigration papers for legal employment

both at the same time btw. apparently being a polish national who speaks english fluently marked me as some sort of ad-anomaly

the ads also believed that i was a senior? at some point i even got a spam call inviting me to join a study on back pain T–T like bro you're at least 10 years early, relax

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It’s because advertising is the pretext for government surveillance

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The ads companies hate the government too. They don't want to share their precious data with the government. The government might just turn around and hand it to someone like Palantir. The companies would much prefer to sell it to Palantir.

There's no cozy relationship between the tech companies and the government. The tech companies just want to make money. If the government were buying the data, they might be willing to do it. But, they really hate that governments try to subpoena the data and get it for free.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago

This was maybe the case back during the Snowden era where the government pushed for compliance and backdoors (like the leaked prism program). That’s the real driving force behind things like e2ee and “privacy forward” steps in the interim that are ultimately just theater. Now if they use XKeyscore to spy on the actual infrastructure of the web it’s not as helpful - WhatsApp, iMessage, etc are all encrypted in transit. But most of these things are not encrypted in a way that prevents the companies from running analytics, selling those analytics to data brokers, who then share with palantir and the NSA (remember Cambridge analytica? Shit like that is an insulating layer so apple, google, and Facebook can now sell your data to the government without directly doing so)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why do so many advertisers think I own a dog? We have like a private, digital panopticon and they still serve me ads for dogfood for dogs I don't don't have.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I have to use facebook for work every few months. All sandboxed and shit. They seem to think I'm in the market for conceal carry yoga pants. Which I fine with, because that means they have no clue about my gender, hobbies, or political alignment.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I used to have a chrome extension that basically poisoned my data by clicking on every ad in the background while hiding the ads from me. I forgot what it was called. I don't use Chrome anymore.

It also benefitted the websites I visited by improving their click-thru while also hurting the advertisers by costing them money for ads that would never be effective.

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

It’s absolutely working. About 50% of the population is susceptible to these ads

[–] paulcdb@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the rich are benefiting from all the ad spending which is all that matters! /s

People really need to remember that you're paying for the ads regardless of if you see them. The only people who lose out are those who show the ads and giving the amount of websites these days that are solely built around showing ads, I really have no sympathy for them.

The bigger question no-one seems to ask is, how much cheaper would products be if they weren't spending trillions on ads in the first place?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Randynippletwist@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to the torment nexus brought you by carls jr

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] guy@piefed.social 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

I have friends who don't use adblockers (!) but I have never heard anyone say that they bought something they saw in an ad.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›