this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
303 points (98.7% liked)

News

34351 readers
3064 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/rrE5R

By analyzing $4 trillion of shipments between January 2024 and November 2025, the Kiel Institute researchers found that foreign exporters absorbed only about 4% of the burden of last year’s U.S. tariff increases by lowering their prices, while American consumers and importers absorbed 96%.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (2 children)

... Isn't that. Like. The point of a tarrif?

What are they trying to distract us from? trump doing the nazis thing? the epstein thing? the invasions of other countries thing?

Maybe trump died and they're hiding it while they shove the refurbished chucky-cheese animatronic robots up his ass.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

What are they trying to distract us from?

[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Five nights at Donny's

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Was the methodology for the study "Step 1, open eyes. Step 2, look at reality as it exists. Step 3, Document results."

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is the methodology for most studies. Science is just trying to understand the observable world with measurements.

Of course Americans are paying for the tariffs. There's the possibility that sellers would eat the costs (by lowering prices proportionately to account for the tariffs), but that only happened 4% of the time.

I'm not especially surprised, but I did think it'd be even closer to 0% than it is.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Like Adam Savage said: The difference between science and screwing around is recording the results.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Fair point. I'm just saying it could be published in Well, Obviously Monthly.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If those poor Americans could think, they would be very upset.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 2 days ago

Thank god they can't. Imagine they do something right accidentally for once.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Trump to Europe today/yesterday: Let me take Greenland or I'll tax my own population even harder!! Join my board of "peace" or my citizens are getting a tax increase! That will show you!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That . . . is how tarriffs work, yes.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

I mean if there is enough room in the profit margin the producer could adjust the price to keep the cost the same.

I can't imagine why they would given the the way the tariffs are applied though.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

But the orange man told me the exporting country would pay!

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

Thank you captain obvious. Why do we have to do studies into things everyone already knows, when Trump doesn't understand something and spreads bullshit? We know what tariffs are. Looking up the meaning of the word in a thesaurus I wouldn't call "research".

[–] DCErik@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In other 'news', Sun to Rise in East Tomorrow, Pope Professes Catholicism, Bear Relieves Self in Wooded Area...

Film @ 11:00

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I can see the Sun. I have no interest in the Pope. But where was that film of the bear having a shit? SHOW ME THE BEAR HAVING A SHIT, NOW!!

Also, did you know if an orange child rapist tries to distract everyone from the decades of child rape he did with his best mate Jeffery Epstein then most of the time it doesn't work? Isn't that weird...

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So in the end, the tariffs really are just a sales tax paid by americans. I seem to recall that the average tax is about 20%, up from the 2.4% in the Biden term. So americans voted for a sales tax, and this evidence shows that they got it. Something like 20% tax on $4 trillion of imports would be about $800 million (so far) of taxes paid by americans so the orange buffoon can give some to Qatar, Argentina, Honduras and the tech bros. Congratulations american voters, you are successfully looting your own pockets.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-trade-war/

The Trump tariffs amount to an average tax increase per US household of $1,100 in 2025 and $1,500 in 2026.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Thats how much my computer, I built the day after the election, went up in parts cost alone.

Not seriously, but probably pretty close. There is no way that the cost is that little per household.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Next thing they'll say Mexico didn't pay for the wall either.
Maybe even that the economy isn't actually doing that great and unemployment is increasing.
Or that USA doesn't really need Greenland for security.
It's like a smear campaign against Trump, as if he was lying all the time.
This is liberal propaganda, you can clearly tell because they use facts, and everybody know that facts have a strong liberal bias.
A serious reporter should report both sides equally!
/s

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Next you're gonna tell me they weren't even EaTiNg ThE cAtS aNd DoGs Of ThE pEoPlE wHo LiVeD tHeRe either!

[–] rslogix89@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

In other news, water is wet.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

we spent a lot of money to figure out that this water, do be wet

[–] BigBolillo@mgtowlemmy.org 8 points 2 days ago

No shit Sherlock..

[–] fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 2 days ago

We knew from the beginning that he never knew what a tariff even did. He just assumed in his hollow-out head that it meant he could threaten other countries. Then he went to demonstrate how little of intelligence he actually had and wouldn't you know, he makes everyone he supposedly "leads" suffer because of it.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thats the most pointless study ever.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Confirming what we assume is not useless.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A tarrif is a tax paid by the purchaser, theres nothing to assume. This study is pointless.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Actually it's paid by the importer.

[–] svullo56@feddit.nu 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm amazed that they put scientists on this. A toddler could see these results coming. Well at least a European toddler. American toddlers are probably eating crayons with their parents.

Having specific data and studies is very important.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Good things money was spent studying... The definition of a tariff.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I love studies that are so unneeded.