this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
448 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

78661 readers
3474 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Every single Monday was called ‘AI Monday,’” Vaughan said, with his mandate for staff that they could work only on AI. “You couldn’t have customer calls; you couldn’t work on budgets; you had to only work on AI projects.” He said this happened across the board, not just for tech workers, but also for sales, marketing, and everybody else at IgniteTech. “That culture needed to be built. That was the key.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 71 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because it had nothing to do with AI

It was an excuse to slash the workforce with relatively little backlash.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

and that's how he achieved 75% profit margin. Let's see him do that twice.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

surprised he didn't golden parachute out and reload with another company/

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Not hard to fire everyone and net a profit, once.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A company so small it doesn't even have a Wikipedia page. No discernible products.

Any poly market bets on how long this company actually lasts?

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

a platform for AI-based email automation

the built a ChatGPT wrapper like all the other revolutionary AI companies lol the world needs more automated spam!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 2 days ago

Their website barely even works it honestly looks like a scam organisation. I can't find any description of what it is that they actually do which makes me believe that they don't do anything.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 105 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels. They were the “most resistant,” he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn’t do, rather than focusing on what it could. The marketing and salespeople were enthused by the possibilities of working with these new tools, he added.

So the people that had an actual idea of what the implications of using it might be weren't on board? Huh. Weird.

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"All the engineers said my "screen door on a submarine" was "stupid" and would "sink the ship", so I fired them and hired new engineers!"

  • CEO of now defunct "Screen Door Subs Inc."
[–] greasewizard@slrpnk.net 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

speaking of submarines, this is the exact line of thinking that turned an idiot CEO into a paste at the bottom of the ocean

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

thank you mighty wizard for casting dopamine.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago

I can not read the word "cast" in any form without remembering this:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I told AI to build me a submarine out of ~~titanium~~ carbon fiber.

  • Stockton Rush (if he were alive today)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Sales and marketing is often mostly bullshitting anyway. It also has a lot less risk and constraints associated to generated text having issues. Not surprised they were more on board. The tool is more fitting for those use cases anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ideonek@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago

Marketing people are known for beliving their own lies.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like the guy with the carbon fiber submarine. Every engineer told him it couldn't be done, so he kept firing them until he had a staff of young, inexperienced engineers who would do what they were told, and just collect their paychecks.

Now their boss is dead, and there are no more paychecks.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well at least that problem fixed itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mad_djinn@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

that writer's name is all you need to know. always look at the writer's name and their previous work to identify industry shills

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 77 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A recent MIT report indicates that 95% of generative AI pilots fail to deliver measurable returns on investment, highlighting significant challenges in successfully implementing AI in businesses

CEOs:

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

“When I do it, it will be different.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 211 points 2 days ago (4 children)

“They ruthlessly cut costs, R&D, and employee benefits and then replace existing employees with overseas contractors. Innovation and growth take a back seat to sheer profitability.”

This is the operating manual that explains why IgniteTech’s much-publicized AI purge feels more like a familiar private-equity play.
[...]
IgniteTech is owned by ESW. For anyone who’s watched the ESW orbit, that vagueness is not accidental. ESW’s playbook, summarized in a long explanatory dossier that has circulated inside the industry, is blunt: buy distressed software, strip costs, move work to an hourly contractor model through a unit like Crossover (which has been described in Forbes as a “global software sweatshop”), and squeeze recurring revenue out of an existing customer base rather than invest in new products.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 176 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Yeah this is called AI washing. Basically firing people, outsourcing all the jobs, stripping a company till there is nothing left. The goal is to maximize profits till the company is basically dead and then sell the husk. Because it's done under the AI label, customers and other interested parties see it as being innovative and not just money grabbing.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago

Selling artificial intelligence to natural idiots.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago

So they could have held paint drying Mondays instead, with the same overall effect

"Every single Monday was called Paint Dry Monday" Vaughan said, with his mandate for staff that they could only watch paint dry. "You couldn't have customer calls; you couldn't work on budgets; you had to only watch paint dry." He said this happened across the board, not just for tech workers, but also for sales, marketing, and everybody else at IgniteTech. "That culture needed to be built. That was the key."

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Its HOW pe FIRMS operate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Very interesting. I appreciate the additional information. Saying its for AI but moving it to overseas contractors instead of actually moving it to AI that is actually overseas contractors (like that one AI company that was outed as being 700 Indian developers) is honestly kinda funny. AI is enshittification given form, I suppose.

[–] Norrdec@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago

Because AI is Actualy Indians :)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably overhired just after COVID like everyone else in the tech sector and then realized he had no idea what to do with all the extra people because he never really had a plan.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

COVID excuse not required. CEOs overhiring is like birds flying south for the winter, the sun rising in the east, water being wet - it's just what they do. 80% is a bit extreme, but he had the AI excuse, so...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He REALLY hates paying employees and wants their pennies in his treasure horde, we get it.

He will be shocked when he discovers the shareholders don't want to pay him, either. He'll be like "what?!?! AI doing MY job? This is a travesty!" and then they will have robot security drag him out of the building screaming.

[–] Doorknob@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Nota bene: Not just laid off, replaced. With other people.

Basically spent a ton of money and talent and business disruption to turn over 80% of his workforce for shits and gigs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What the fuck is IgniteTech?

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

An "enterprise-software powerhouse", allegedly. Basically they bought an AI startup and decided that this was their entire personality now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The question I put to management is "What do you want me to use AI for?"

I can't get a consistent answer. Lots of stuff unrelated to my job duties. "Well, it's so easy to make Facebook ads!" - "You know that's not a thing I do, right?"

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 15 points 2 days ago

They don't have an answer because they don't know either. They've bought into the idea, and invested trillions, and now they're all hoping to just churn the cream until it turns into something else, but they have no idea what it will be, or how to use it.

They're just hoping some minion finally figures out a profitable model, so they can claim it as their own, give him a nominal raise and a nice office, and they can go make trillions off his idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Did AI build that dogshit website of theirs too?

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 45 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Wtf it just opened a video in full screen on iOS right away. When I closed it and wanted to scroll down I was suddenly dragging an icon. When tapping this icon it opens some „my personas“ dialog which I don’t even understand what it is supposed to be? What even is this shit ass site?

Edit: page title is „Home V2“ lol

Edit 2: Of course this site is made using Elementor, hence the bad performance and buggy layout.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If this dickhead is so smart, why does he even need a staff? I’m sure he can go start a company all by himself with just AI to work for him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is a paid promotion. Its one of the ones you pay an extra $1000 and they hide the sponsored tag.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder how many employees are working on automating the CEO there first

[–] Bleys@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From the article:

Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels. They were the “most resistant,” he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn’t do, rather than focusing on what it could. The marketing and salespeople were enthused by the possibilities of working with these new tools, he added.

Not surprising the people with technical skills that aren’t actually replaceable by LLMs would be against forced AI adoption. Good luck maintaining a code base created with vibe coding. Meanwhile the CEO probably looks at ChatGPT and realizes it could basically do everything he already does (write emails and make high level decisions without actually having to worry about their implementation) and then incorrectly thinks it’s the case for everyone else.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

May a large object fall on him. Death is the only solution to these people.

[–] bastien@lemmy.wtf 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This reads like a very weird AI circlejerk. They repeatedly mention that AI is the solution every company should adopt, but fail to provide a single example of succesful application. And I mean a how not a reult. They say 'company X KPI are this % better thanks to AI', but not how they applied it. Just talk of AI mindset, and 'culture' but I would have liked to understand what exactly it was used for (like agents, chatbots, automation of something in particular). It just reads like a lot of patting in the back and hot air so far, which is a pity because I would be interested in reading about real life cases of successful AI implementaiom

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

So business grinds to a halt? That's crazy.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

"I am bad at managing my finances, and eventually need to get bailed out by the government, or end up next to the homeless guy I used to make fun of".

  • This guy.
[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›