anamethatisnt

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I can't find any proper tests on the matter but here's someone with the Thinkpad X13 with the same CPU answering the battery question.
https://old.reddit.com/r/thinkpad/comments/x4nevt/perfect_laptop_x13_gen_1_amd_ubuntu_2204/ioibywd/

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

And in general I would consider "they" to be "not gendering that person" without adding any negative or positive values to it.
I understand that it isn't all that simple when it comes to lgbtq and those who are actively misgendering someone as a refusal to accept their gender. Give those fuckers hell, they deserve it, but if it's possible that someone is using it as I consider it to be used then give them the benefit of the doubt. It'll make the world seem a bit brighter if nothing else.
We're not all hateful bastards, some of us just don't read usernames and are lucky enough to not have to think about pronouns and gender. Thanks for making me think a bit more about it this evening.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would say it is moving the goalposts to the topic at hand, but let's agree to disagree.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Are you of the opinion that the pronouns are relevant to the length of their (plural their mind you, OP and imogen_underscore) bans or that the discussion here will somehow change depending on their gender?

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Chill out, it can also be used when gender is irrelevant.

Singular they has become the pronoun of choice to replace he and she in cases where the gender of the antecedent – the word the pronoun refers to – is unknown, irrelevant, or nonbinary, or where gender needs to be concealed. It’s the word we use for sentences like Everyone loves his mother.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

I guess it depends on what fps you're aiming for. If you were satisfied with how kcd1 ran on your rig I wouldn't worry. kcd2 seems to be better optimised than kcd1.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ah, I guess they've improved since kcd1 then. Towns could be a cpu killer in the first one.

edit: I see people mentioning kcd2 running better for them than kcd1 does, f.e.
https://www.reddit.com/r/kingdomcome/comments/1ij448t/im_shocked_how_well_the_game_runs_on_my_10_year/

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

If you want to play kcd2 on that system in the future without upgrading cpu then I would look for a 5700x3d or 5800x3d rather than a 5600.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Pfft, why argue the name of donut holes when you can create a trinut?

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Från att vara med och anmäla FRA-lagen som en del av Centrum för rättvisa till att genomföra något sådant här.
Jag hoppas verkligen att Gunnar Strömmer ligger vaken om natten när han tänker på skiten han nu trycker igenom.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

Just as many still uses Outlook and email as some sort of FTP service and then whine about reaching their 50GB/100GB M365 mailboxes.

view more: next ›