this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
464 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27054 readers
3013 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Federal officers fired tear gas to disperse early-morning protesters as outrage mounted in Minneapolis over the killing of a 37-year-old woman in her vehicle.

It's time to treat ICE as the organized criminal organization that it is

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "can't access the evidence"? Can someone send this MF a Lemmy link with the video?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

They probably dont have access to the gun, brass, or maybe even bullets lodged in the victim or vehicle. Those, along with crime scene photographs, would usually be presented at trial.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They may not even have a positive id on the shooter, since they hide behind masks - they know what they’re doing is criminal

[–] HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think the world's gov'ts that are trending authoritarian will get the data centers they need to sift thru everyone's internet history and kill/imprison/deport those who disagree with them politically. I have a hard time believing they won't go with the kill option bc it's more economic. So, bye!!! See ya next life!!!

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

It's the final solution

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Without complete access to the evidence, witnesses and information collected, we cannot meet the investigative standards that Minnesota law and the public demand."

This is gaslighting by cowardly state officials. If you can get official records great. But they are not necessary. You have countless eye witnesses and multiple angles of video recording the murder. You don't refuse to prosecute gang hits because you don't have access to official cartel records. No different with ICE.

This is bullshit stonewalling by cowards in state office who are afraid to hold the powerful accountable.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I imagine without access to all to data, it can give the opportunity for the defense to call for a mistrial.

He's was also on 'official duty', so the administration is trying to push it out of MN's system by saying she was the aggressor who attempted to kill him. (If he was killed, it would be instantly out of MN's hands)

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago

I bet they threaten more politicians families. And they folded.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Obstruction of justice say what?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s all trump did in his first term, besides giving trillions to billionaires. Nothing happened.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

No they're Trump's puppets

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so don't use the evidence they aren't giving you and use what you can get. the public videos and statements from witnesses should be enough.

[–] londos@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Get dat unprotected Flock data

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There is going to have to be an investigation, arrest, trial, conviction and punishment. Failure to do any of these things is just going to be a powderkeg exploding. You see the video and it's clear she isn't trying to run him over. You see the video and it's clear she isn't a terrorist. You see the video and it's clear the agent was never in danger. This is state-sponsored murder by an unlawful posse. We reached the Duterte stage this quickly, less than one year from inauguration.

The bluechecks and bots on Twitter are just fascist accelerationists trying to make armed conflict happen as fast as possible to give cover for martial law and seize power. And that may be how it plays out. But they are literally out here killing innocent US citizens, and all of the deeply-embedded racism and xenophobia that lets Americans shrug at a brown person or an immigrant with a Latin-sounding name getting abused or killed, it's not here.

This is different and I don't think it's going away.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

I think calling for armed conflict isn't accelerationist, it's already past the line where it should have happened and people are still sitting around thinking "if we just wait until the midterms and vote, things will work out".

It was too late last week, it is too late today, and by the time midterms come, if they come, fascism will have taken 100% hold and the US will be absolutely done.

As it stands now, even if things changed tomorrow, the US will take decades to recover from this - if it even can.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

We see because we value facts and evidence, seeking out information to gain an understanding of the situation before making judgements about it.

The dumbfucks who voted for this and continue to cheer it on don't. They appeal to authority, and when authority says to not believe the evidence of their eyes and ears, they cover them. If the regime says she was a "domestic terrorist" or radical leftist, they double down and blame the victim.

Her daylight murder will enrage and concern rational and reasonable people, but it won't do jack shit for the instigating bootlickers who voluntarily impede solidarity and justice.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I will happily make a bet that nothing will happen to that murderer and the ICE will continue as they were.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You may be right the murderer gets off, but I disagree that ICE will continue as they were, because the response here will set an example either way to ICE.

If the murderer is convicted under state law (which I think is very possible with publicly available evidence, and there seems to be a will to prosecute from Walz and the Minneapolis mayor), individual ICE members will realize Trump and Noem can't fully protect them no matter how hard they try to distort reality. It won't solve it, but they will be afraid of punishment. And since their level of moral reasoning is stuck right about at a 3-year-old's "avoid punishment" phase, we need ICE to be in a state of fear of consequences and it should have an effect.

If the murderer is not convicted (or worse, not even arrested/prosecuted), of course that's going to grease the authoritarian slide, and we'll see even more egregious crimes happen more quickly and with even less attention.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I really really hope you're right and I would lose that bet. But we already know that the FBI is doing the "investigation" and they're not sharing any evidence or information with the state police, and Trump is already sending extra agents.

If that ICE murderer gets away, which it looks like he will. That will send the opposite message to all ICE agents - they can kill white, American citizens and nothing will happen to them.

Most Americans are way too naive about what is happening and way too optimistic about things just "working out" somehow.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have the PD arrest the dude.. oh wait ACAB

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Hoisted by our own petard!

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't let them investigate either, if I was trying to cover up a murder.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago

So stop investigating, take the material you have, which is enough to put the murderer into prison.

[–] LemUser@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

So conduct your own investigation you twits.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Right, right, and, uh, what was that agent’s name agian? Uh, just so we know not to investigate it. (“*snkk* Shutup! shutup”)
Ah, yeah I got a pen. Go ahead.