this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
946 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

10093 readers
2867 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 145 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They will buy the media, undermine your democracy and institute fascism if you tax them.

They will also do that if you don't tax them.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looks like they’ve already done most of that tbh

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

That's how we know!

[–] Sirence@feddit.org 112 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Heard this weird comment on the radio the other day: "We can't tax the rich because they are the best milk-cows in our stable." Mate if you can't get milk from a cow it's hardly the best one in your stable.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they don't eat the meat and they don't drink the milk, why keep them around?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 24 points 1 week ago

They're not the cows, they're the ranch owners.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] f314@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My country (Norway) saw a lot of rich people moving to Switzerland because of more advantageous tax rules, so we actually did implement an “exit tax”!

To the surprise of no one, the rich people will not stop whining about it.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

germany has a rule like that also, but people pretend like it doesn't exist and rich people would leave if we tax them

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Norway is awesome. I really admire your country

[–] f314@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

We’ve, as most of the world, been drifting right for a few decades unfortunately. The tax I mentioned was one of the main issues in last year’s election even though it affects nearly no one. That’s a sign of a small group gaining control of public discourse, which is not great…

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

“Billionaires will leave if you tax them.”

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They aren’t paying enough to begin with as an overall percentage of the state’s tax, so what’s the difference if they leave?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I think the underlying threat is that they'll bring their industry with them.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be nice if ALL billionaires left and concentrated in a single location.

Then we could all play some Mario & Luigi.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We wouldn't need to. They have no survival skills. They survive by leeching off the rest of us. If we isolated them from us, they'd be dead inside of a year.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Supplying them with enough narcotics and at least half of them would take themselves out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you tax them enough they won’t be billionaires anymore, so billionaires really wouldn’t leave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 20 points 1 week ago

They don't pay their share and they don't keep their money where they live anyway, so leave and hopefully die on the way to Dubai or whatever tax haven you decide to go, billionaire piece of shit

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What is the downside?

Option 1) Billionaires and no tax revenue from billionaires.

Option 2) Lower housing prices because no billionaires and no tax revenues from billionaires.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Putting a tax on billionaires leaving is actually a brilliant idea...

  • Consistent: they made that wealth, in your country, so by the same principles of income tax, VAT, or corporation tax, we know the government believes it deserves a cut. All that money they take wth them is money the government was intending to dip into slowly over the course of 10 years or so.
  • Targets a Loophole: Billionaires are of course uniquely positioned to relocate on a whim - normal people and even many millionaires will not be able to do this, as they can't change jobs on the fly, get someone else to sell their house for them, remotely buy a house in another country.
  • Motivates them to be better: the taxation of billionaires is ultimately about increasing the complexity of the system until they're left with no choice but to be useful. But first we have to weather the storm of them trying to bribe the government not to tax them, before we can get there.
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As stated in this post, this exists in several countries: Germany, Norway...

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So basically the governments of the uk and usa are always like 'ah we can't tax the rich because they'll run away and then we'll go from 10% tax effectiveness to 0%, when countries of a similar developememt level are already doing it and doing fine?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They'll leave, but still own their property. 

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Property is very taxable!

[–] WhirlpoolBrewer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Tax the property. Tax it so high they have to sell it, creating a greater supply of property which then reduces the price of property and the cost of living. Economics 101

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly if they’re not paying for anything in the community anyway why do we care whether or not they stay?

I’m tired of 0.1% courting and worshipping that people do.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

I could not agree more. These are people who have taken greed and hoarding of wealth well into the realm of mental illness, and we are supposed to admire them!

[–] masinko@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Massachusetts implemented a 4% millionaire tax in 2022 and a small capital gains tax. The results?

  • extra $3b in tax revenue, extra $1.3b with the capital gains changed.
  • passed a $2.5 billion infrastructure & education bill
  • millionaires in Massachusetts actually grew because of the economic expansion
  • collective wealth of the people in the state went up by 40% two years after it passed

It's proven that it works. We just need policies that benefit people and not just the rich.

Some of the sources:

https://www.axios.com/local/boston/2025/04/29/millionaires-massachusetts-income-surtax-increase

https://www.nbcboston.com/news/politics/data-shows-mass-is-home-to-more-millionaires-despite-new-surtax-according-to-advocates/3698430/

But then how will Musk et al ever become trillionaires if they are taxed accordingly? /s

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I already bought it, you don't need to keep selling it to me.

[–] JuliaSuraez@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Worth remembering: the “they’ll leave” line gets used for any reform—so it’s healthier to ask for data and design policy around outcomes, not threats.

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago
  1. Billionaires and millionaires want to live in safe places. Guess where it is safe? Where the general public has a good relative wealth. Guess what taxes causes...
[–] Simulation@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Good riddance. The perfect analogy is removing a brain cancer.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would they leave? This system has made them billionaires. Even if it costs them a little bit more, this system STILL generates billions in revenue. They won't find a friendlier attitude anywhere else on the planet. If they could, they'd be there.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

They never leave. China won't let them get that rich because they're not part of the party, Europe is many smaller markets with various regulations that make it less profitable. South America and Africa are both risky and difficult.

Tax em till all kids have enough to eat and get great educations.

load more comments
view more: next ›