Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
I haven't read the article, but I'm hoping the answer is "the bottom of the ocean."
God no! Then we have to worry about the environmental impact. Now if they themselves are at the bottom then that ..... that would be wonderful.
Don’t worry, they sank outside of the environment.
Damn that exact same thought went through my head. Well honestly it was more like “visiting the titanic“ but as me idea.
Somebody alert the Orcas.
They might need a little help
That was my first thought too. Those orcas would do us a solid.
Orca shaped sea droanz?
Only after the real orcas have their fun tearing off the rudders. lol
But yea, torpedoes away!
Everyone else has already made great points, so I'm gonna throw a new one out there. Why do all of these people with more money than God dress like absolute shit. I'm sure that cowboy hat cost more than I make in a year, but the man looks like an idiot. Musk and zuck always have the dumbest trash on, too. I get that they are trying to look different to signal that they are elite, but it really just gives off a strong "Look Mom! I dressed myself today!" vibe.
It’s the same reason they have such outlandish there opinions. There is no one in their orbit to tell them ‘no.’ They’ve been experiencing ai psychosis for years, only in the form of yes men instead of plagiarism machines. Anyone that had the temerity to tell Elon that no, we will not have people living on Mars within ten years has long since been removed from access to him.
In absolutely no way defending them- if you spent your life having every person you interacted with telling you that whatever drivel you spouted was the greatest thing ever, you too would presume to be one of the smartest on Earth.
Its the extreme end of "I can dress the way I want, screw what others are thinking". But when that becomes a thing of its own it ends in some questionable fashion choices.
It's what happens when you are surrounded by yes men. Also they can never experience genuine love without wondering if the person is just there for their money.
Guy I work with thinks it's a a very short matter of time before kamikaze drone swarms take out some boardrooms - I think that kind of worry is behind all their secrecy about tracking these folks' locations
These techno feudalist freaks don’t realize that when you set up an extrajudicial mafia infrastructure, it’s only a matter of time before one of your capos slit your throat and take your place.
Love it, but unfortunately that is not an original thought anymore:
Counter-Drone Systems For Yachts Are Growing In Popularity
Still delicious. Let them quake in their boots.
I'm sure they have them, but the wire guided ones I've seen (on video!) used in Ukraine are crazy. E: But you're right, even if they can't jam the drones, just the detection is probably enough to be safe on a superyacht. I hope the paparazzi never let them rest
So this is gonna be a bit rambly but I do have a point to make.
My great-grandfather worked on V1s and V2s for the US Navy during WW2 mostly on the gyroscopic guidance system but also was witnessed to general testing. Anyways he wrote a never published paper on theoretical strategic and tactical uses on their usage, he gave wee little 11 year old me a solid summary of them.
Basically he wanted to create a deep deployment method for US Army Rangers wherein they could airdrop in a simplified V1 based design deep into enemy lines which could then be set up for sabotage methods. He wanted to create a high powered long range but single use transmitter that could be used to set them off for fire and forget sabotage.
Anyways I'm curious if anyone will dig up or think of said ideas, since they basically predate modern tech and would more or less be impossible to counter without firing off an AA system. Hell with modern tech you could probably outright improve apon his idea.
i'v honestly been considering it, not boardrooms (too much collateral damage) but park a kamikaze drone or 2 at each vacation home of these billionaires and just wait for the cunts to show up.
taking out murdoch's 1st son (his daughters want to sell the propaganda machine off for parts), thiel, and bannon would fix so much current/future suffering in this world. musk...i feel like it's almost worse to leave him alive at this point.
This is the real reason why they just banned us from cheap drones.
DJl even remοved the geοfeηces with a fιrmware υpdaτe.
I totally agree. It’s the type of attack virtually anyone can pull off solo with just a couple thousand dollars. You don’t even need a lot of engineering skills, battle-ready quadcopters are available off the shelf. The only thing that would be difficult is the payload, and there are plenty of people capable of making a pipe bomb.
Everyone should watch the short film Slaughterbots, I think it does a good job of explaining. https://youtu.be/HipTO_7mUOw
This brings up a lot of thoughts in my head, but one thing is clear: in every instance the crew gets off safely.
I don't care. Why does anyone care?
This information is only important if they are guiding us to where we can burn these things down.
Their regular yachts? What about their super yachts?