this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
386 points (98.2% liked)

Games

22371 readers
245 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 91 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (17 children)

I went over to Reddit so I could keep track if the game awards because I didn't have time to actually watch it. Holy shit the hate E33 is getting is completely ridiculous, as Reddit does. Whether you go to the Silksong, KCD2, Death Stranding, Dispatch, Arc Raiders, or any other games subreddit that was nominated for any award about half the comments saying E33 is trash, overhyped, and their game deserved to win instead. As someone that has enjoyed all of these games, the salt is absolutely bonkers. Most of the ones complaining are basically saying "I never played it but I heard they did [blank] so they don't deserve [blank] award."

I just don't get why they need to shit on other people and the games they like just because their game didn't win. Shit on TGA all you want, but the fans and the devs literally had nothing to do with winning. They were all great games and all deserve praise in their own ways. In two weeks none of us will give a shit anymore anyway and will probably be complaining that "RV There Yet" wins the "Most Innovative Gameplay" award on Steam. I mean, a flippin' gacha game won the "Players Voice" Award and people are spending their time shitting on objectively good games.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 84 points 5 days ago (4 children)

For what it's worth most people are more mad that E33 won best indie and best debut indie. It's not an indie game, many people have said as much and it's completely unfair that they won in categories meant for small budget games by small teams.

Totally deserved in other categories, but that does leave a bad taste in my mouth.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 43 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's pretty much where I'm at too. Though the "Indie Award" has always had similar problems before, such as the Dave the Diver debacle. But even though you could technically argue E33 is an indie it felt really wrong to have it up against something like Blue Prince in the indie categories. E33 had a huge budget with A-list actors ffs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

The category is misnamed. It should be best single A game from an independent studio.

Technically Sandfall is an independant studio. A very well privately funded independant studio founded by industry veterans supported by a great publisher. But no-one is arguing that other games published by Kepler Interactive aren't independant. And with 30-ish full-time employees Sandfall's scale is that of an SME, not an Ubisoft/EA/Sony.

The award doesn't feel right because this middleweight AA category was completely abdandoned the previous decade (which legacy studios are now paying a heavy price for), and "indie" came to mean "single A" because if the material conditions of being an independant company.
At the same time though technological advancements enabled small teams to take on larger and larger projects. "Indie" does not mean what it used to, and Clair Obscur is trailblazing this AA renewal. Award shows simply need to adapt and start restricting entry based on team size or something.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I guess I'm confused because I didn't know that "low budget" was now synonymous with "indie." They are an indie dev that made their first game yet their game doesn't count as "indie" because they had a budget? What about a game like No Man's Sky? They were an indie dev that got promoted by Sony and everyone shat on it when it came out and said they bit off more than they could chew. In my opinion, that seems even less fair.

I'm not saying they deserved the award more than any other game, I enjoyed all the games nominated, I'm just saying that if E33 flopped I highly doubt anyone would call them more than an indie dev that tried to punch above their weight just like No Man's Sky.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I guess I’m confused because I didn’t know that “low budget” was now synonymous with “indie.”

There aren't any hard rules of what an indie game is, and TGA don't set any because they don't take their jobs seriously, but it's usually accepted that indie = small teams, small budget. Otherwise, technically games like Cyberpunk 2077 are "indie" because they're self-published, while games published by Devolver Digital are technically not indie because they have a publisher despite the games being made on a tiny budget and occasionally created by only one person.

Expedition 33 had a huge budget compared to other games in its category, and much more developers. They had mo-cap, they had popular voice actors, and they had tons of contract workers overseas. It's not fair to put it up against games that didn't have any of that.

E33 is what the industry refers to as a AA game. Mid-sized budget, mid-sized team. As opposed to AAA, massive budgets with massive teams.

What about No Man's Sky

No Man's Sky (on release) is way smaller in scope than E33. It was made by around a dozen developers only, and they actually self-published it which makes it much more "indie".

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So a successful crowdfunding campaign could make a game not indie anymore?

"Indie" means "independent", which means there is no publisher or investor that could influence creative decisions in the service of profits. (As CDPR is publicly traded and does answer to investors, Cyberpunk would not qualify.)

If you want a low budget award, call it low budget award and define a threshold for said budget.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Game awards are ridiculous, but I will never forget Expedition 33. It deserves all the accolades it has earned and achieved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Imagine the average gamer. Imagine the average reddit user.

Now combine them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

The problem with the Internet is that it amplifies minority negative voices. Hundreds of thousands of people played that game and 100 pieces of shit get on reddit and be assholes and it gives all of their players bases a bad name. It's the same across anything. On the Internet a loud minority is going to piss in everyone's lemonade because they are trash humans.

What makes it worse is algorithm based social media prioritize rage bait since it creates engagement. It's breaking all of our brains.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Gamers make me embarrassed to enjoy video games

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 49 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If we could just keep this trend of having the game awards completely snuff the big studios, that'd be great.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

does seem weird to me to just give all the awards to one game, but then critic-awards shows always have been kind of a joke

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"We've picked one game and we're giving every award to that game because it's the best game at everything and have you played the game yet? You should it's so good it's just the best at everything."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_Interactive

Kepler Interactive was founded in September 2021 at the initiative of former Ubisoft employee and French entrepreneur Alexis Garavayan, who had previously co-founded the video game investment fund Kowloon Nights. Self-described as a "super developer" publishing group, Kepler was born out of an alliance between seven independent studios to “pool their resources and knowledge”:

Hedge Fund ass publisher. Come on, guys. The Gaming Awards have always just been sponsored content and you're getting hoodwinked because you don't recognize the sponsor this time around.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Are you trying to say that any game that gets funding of any kind is automatically not worthy of winning?

I'm perfectly fine with people making money in exchange for an excellent product, and Expedition 33 is a fucking masterpiece.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

But it was the best at pretty much everything.

Other than best RPG, that should've gone to kingdome come deliverance 2 imo, but like e33 winning that isn't unreasonable.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Indie title should have honestly gone to Silksong, and the Making a Difference award probably had worthier games.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 51 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully their next game continues with that quality. The old RPG giants are mostly floundering are mere shells of what they used to be. Most of the old talent already sold out or retired.

The industry needs new talent to take over.

[–] nithou@piefed.social 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And get rid of its predators... I'm always so sad to see my friends working in the game industry so exploited, fired without a thought, all to benefit greedy executives who never played a single game in their lives...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 37 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Which is weird, since that game wasn't even marketed. I literally hadn't even heard of it till it started winning shit left and right

[–] MirrorGiraffe@piefed.social 38 points 5 days ago (2 children)

One could even say it's quite the obscure game to win awards like this..?

[–] emmanuel_car@fedia.io 24 points 5 days ago

That’s Clair

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

That's one area where you can see it is indie despite the large development cost.

They were published by Kepler Interactive and for some markets Bandai Namco. Neither of which have Ubisoft or EA's marketing budget which normally makes up something like half of the development budget of a game.

They did have some marketing. I know a lot of French streamers were paid to play the game on launch. But yeah not "in your face for 6 months in front of every YouTube video and inside every happy meal box" like a new assassin's creed or something.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 10 points 5 days ago

I don't think it had a big marketing strategy, but it definitely marketed itself through word of mouth because it definitely deserved all the praise (and now awards) it got.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If you had ever seen the Game Awards before, this isn't exactly surprising.

It was not only good, but weird and unique. It was always going to sweep the show because that's exactly the kind of game the judges of it have favored every single year.

That's why the good, but ultimately derivative games didn't win as much.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The only award I think it didn't deserve was Best RPG.

But, on the other hand, it should have gotten Best Sound Design over BF6; so it still would have gotten 9 awards.

Truly a masterpiece of a game. To those haters saying "But not even BG3 got that many awards!" it's not a fair comparison. BG3 is a slightly better game IMO, but Expedition 33 is a work of art on top of being an amazing game and appeals to a much wider audience. Which isn't to say games like BG3 aren't beautiful, but I think anyone would agree that E33 is on a whole other level.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

I'll see you Best RPG and raise you a Best Independent and Best Debut Indie.

They have a publisher that funded them with hedge fund money and outsourced aspects of the production to entirely different companies. I'm not making a comment on the quality of the game, but how is that indie?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nithou@piefed.social 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm so happy for them, the emotions this game brought to me were absolutely unique, its approach on grief was so beautiful. And can't forget the music that I keep humming for the last months...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verdi@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The French are really something else! Their ability to convey emotion is peerless in the planet.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I love when they block all the roads with tractors and spray manure into government buildings to protest the government being shitty at governing.

It conveys the emotions I feel so much better than I ever could (I don't own large quantities of manure, not the means to propel them at high speeds).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago

Baguette supremacy.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

E33 was the surprise of the year for me. It came from nowhere.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I just started playing expedition 33 and I can see why it won so many awards absolutely amazing game!

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why do they look like stereotypes?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Senseless@feddit.org 13 points 5 days ago (4 children)

A bit overhyped I think. Yes, I haven't played it through yet. Yes, it is indeed a good game (even though I don't like JRPGs). The soundtrack is absolutely fantastic. Bit I don't think it's better than BG3 and I'm sad, that KCD2 didn't win anything because in most, if not all, categories it was paired up with COE33.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In my honest opinion as someone that had played and enjoyed both games, they both deserved the awards in their own ways. I think Kingdom Come is definitely a better RPG in general, but at the same time E33 is an amazing game that is an RPG. It's semantics at this point and I think it's more of a lack of categories. RPG is such a loose term these days that I feel like it should be sub-divided into a few more. Lumping games together and comparing games that are vastly different based solely on a loose term like RPG is disingenuous.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That's because Clair Obscur is directly influenced by the JRPG genre which is why it feels almost like not a RPG compared to something that is a western RPG like KC:D2.

But I agree, the term RPG is way overloaded and it needs a more stricter set of rules to define what a RPG is. But it's been that way for almost a decade at this point and I no longer care to split hairs about it, I just laugh when Monster Hunter gets nominated as an RPG because in my mind I would never consider it a RPG.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Souyo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago

Which is funny because it didn't win best sound track at the biting awards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I'm not saying E33 didn't deserve to win anything, but I don't believe it deserved to dominate like that. No single game should be allowed to do this, ever.

I mean, of the 6 nominees for Best Performance, 3 of them (50%) were from E33. That shouldn't be allowed, IMO. Pick the single best performance from one game, then you can have more variety to pick from. Also, the winner of Best Indie Game should automatically be disqualified from also winning Best Indie Debut game.

In my opinion: KCD2 snubbed for Best RPG, Silksong snubbed for best Action Adventure, and Half-Life 3 snubbed for Most Anticipated Game (is it disqualified -- no professionals allowed?).

[–] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

This is why some award shows have an award for being so outstanding you're in danger of ruining the show by taking all the awards. They give the award to them at the beginning and remove them from all categories, basically letting everyone play for second place.

I think more than specifically any game being better at X than E33, I think a lot of people are mostly just upset there were so many great games that just didn't win anything because E33 was there.

Why shouldnt the best actor be for the best performance regardless of which game it appears in?

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

To me, it’s an indicator that the rest of the industry bankrupted its talent and innovation. There’s been some great indie games, but nothing overwhelmingly amazing, certainly not in the AAA space.

[–] rangeCheck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I have the most issue with the performance win, that the nominations are for the English voice acting and this is not even an English game. The original acting is French, I played it with French voice + English subtitle. To me the English voice acting is just part of the localization. This is such an English-centric award and snub for non-English performances.

If anything the motion capture actors are more "worthy".

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Original language is always better in my opinion. Filtering it into English has to leave out or change something.

I think for other people though they see the English voice actors as more professional or higher paid or more famous, whatever it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›