this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
1339 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

18011 readers
893 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 96 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Pika is a real animal?

Gen 1 pokemon really are just funny colored real animals.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 89 points 1 month ago

“Ekans” is just “Snake” spelled backwards.

“Muk” is just…oh, oh god

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pika is pronounced "pie-kuh" generally. Pikachu comes from pika pika (japanese onomatopoeia for "sparking/sparkling" usually with the connotation of clean) + chuu (sound a mouse makes/squeak).

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Actually it comes from pika(-tto), the onomatopoeia for a lightning strike.

[–] Cintari@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not according to an interview by the creator of Pikachu, Atsuko Nishida:

“Since it was an Electric-type Pokémon, I thought ‘pika‘ [the expression of light flashing in Japanese].

https://web.archive.org/web/20211108083831/https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/creator-profile-the-creators-of-pikachu/

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually, name of many Pokemon are multi layered

So there is no wrong, but both right

It is the beauty of Pokemon names and even concepts

Watch some lockstin and gnoggin if interested in this topic 😇

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah I just think it's kind of neat how the names of English pokemon are formed in a similar way to how they are in Japanese.

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

They're the same. The "pika" is from "hika", which refers to light.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Voltorb, Muk, Magnemite, and Mr Mime would all like a word with you. Jynx, however, doesn't mind.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Oh they brought a lot of love alright

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Bigger lens is better for wildlife photography and long distance shot. Animals scurry away when you try to get close, so it's best to take a picture from the distance.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Confusingly, there is the animal in the post that is commonly called pika (Ochotona daurica). What I had to think of first was Pica pica though (the Eurasian magpie)

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When you stare into pica, pica stares into you. Also sprach Zarathustra.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Zarathustra sprach only once.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

Zarathustra kann mich mal :P

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Casually using an amazing photo for a meme 👍

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

A top-shelf flex.

[–] Prontomomo@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like the content, but seriously I’m baffled as to how this is a science meme?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I would assume because it's related to educating someone about why optical lenses can give an incredible amount of detail that digital just can't compete with. But that's just a guess and that might not even be enough for this forum

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's a digital lens exactly?.. The only thing I can think of are in some point& shoot cameras and phones they have fake factorial zooms that are just cropping into the resolution.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i'm guessing it was a brain shortcut for a "digital zoom lens"

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Absolutely correct

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also, because posts like this drive really informative comment sections like this thread. I promise there's a method to the madness.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

~~you people do understand it is fake, and if you zoom on the top right eye, it is not the same as bottom right, right?~~

ok, so to my surprise, it seems to be possible. the difference in the eye may be result of multiple layers of shitty jpeg compression.

the author has more pictures on his web - https://www.pjvphotography.com/Fauna/Pikas

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

it is though

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

☺️compression did nothing wrong

You are not supposed to zoom into a compressed photo 🤭

[–] DearMoogle@lemmy.today 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What does it say, when it sneezes?

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Tap for spoilerPi

Ka

Chuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Mountains in the eye of a trailside pika, ...

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

Eating seeds as a pastime activity

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

moments lost, like tears in rain

good bye

now I gotta watch blade runner again dammit! RIP Rutger Olsen Hauer for that performance god DAMN!

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

beautiful 🤌

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] halfdane@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Today's risky click is presented by GreatTitEnthusiast 👀

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Hey, I'm just hear because I heard climate change is threatening Great Tits

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why 600mm? Because sometimes you need really good photos of squirrels.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can also see them directly, with your own eyes

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

but the pika is cute >.<

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Follow for more life hacks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Laughs in micro fourthirds.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Listen buddy, I spent a lot of money on my full frame, and a lot of muscle lugging it around, so I'd appreciate it if you could keep your superior sensor to yourself.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not even that much of a sacrifice. There are some modern 600s that weigh less than what a typical 70-200/2.8 does. Granted, they're on the darker side, but if you have the light (supposedly you will during a hike), you don't always need an f/4.

load more comments
view more: next ›