this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
119 points (98.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

38296 readers
692 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

You're right, they're just over legs at that point.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Are (over)pants underpants if you don’t wear something under them?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

How long does your pubic hair have to be to qualify as underpants?

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Depends on how fat your ass is. But anywhere from 3 to 6 feet.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

What if you wear underpants over your pants? Does that makes pants overpants underpants pants.

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

You're gonna need to check with a kindergarten teacher. They're actually trained to answer questions like that.

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago

That makes you Superman

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

That's called free balling and no.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago

The brits neatly sidestep this quandry by calling them pants and trousers respectively, and I think they've honestly got the superior system there. I mean one of our American gods (Superman) wears them on the outside, how can we continue in good conscience to call them "under"-pants?

[–] Bhaelfur@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

How many pants could underpants pants if underpants could pants pants?

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Six.

Seven if it's a woodchuck in underpants.

[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 14 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Are they still underpants if you're wearing them over pants?

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Superman enters the chat.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well they are not overpants

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Akshually, those are tights, not pants. And those "underpants" are short pants.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What about the waterproof overpants that keep your regular pants dry?????

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Look man, I'm trying here. I don't have all the answers so you'll have to figure some things out for yourself. Good luck.

::jumps onto sky cycle and flies away::

[–] url@feddit.fr 2 points 15 hours ago

They are panties

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Should my dog see a vet if it underpants?

[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Not if it's nose is still wet.

But they shouldn't drive to the vet, just in case.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 4 points 22 hours ago

The yanks had it wrong; underpants never existed. Just pants and trousers

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

Is it still an underpass if you're not passing anything?
Is it still an overpass if you ain't over shit?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Inpantception 2: Under the Underpants

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I suggest establishing a formal hierarchy of *-pants, with individual terms to distinguish shape, purpose and colour in conjunction with effective and/or absolute layer. And you should be the one to do it, because I don't have time for that.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Layer-0 pants are the ones touching your arse.
Layer-1 pants cover Layer-0 (tights, stockings, trousers).
Layer-2 pants (optional) cover Layer-1 (shorts over tights, trousers, etc..)

Simple

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Layer-3 pants (optional, temporary) - Protective legwear. (Snow pants, motorcycle/horseback chaps, shin guards)

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 17 hours ago

Layer -(-1) privledged layer, accessible only through permission system

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

4th dimensional pants (Hyperpants)

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago

With diagrams explaining, in detail, the purpose and function of each layer. By Monday, or you're fired.