this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
16 points (90.0% liked)

Canada

10675 readers
429 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canadian trade officials have launched anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations into Chinese-built truck bodies after imports surged more than tenfold in three years, hammering pricing and order books for Canadian manufacturers.

Chinese suppliers are allegedly selling bodies at deeply discounted prices and benefiting from government support, undercutting domestic builders serving OEM dealers, leasing companies and mid-sized fleets.

...

Imports from China represented just 4% of Canada’s truck body volume in 2022. By the first half of 2025, they climbed to 54%. Domestic manufacturers reported price depression, lost sales, reduced capacity utilization and softer hiring as lower-priced imports gained traction.

The CBSA estimates preliminary dumping margins at 51.4% and subsidies worth 36.6% of export prices. It also triggered a Section 20 inquiry, signalling concerns that China’s truck body sector may not operate under market economy conditions — a move that could lead to higher duties.

...

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal is reviewing whether the surge in imports is injuring domestic producers. A decision is due by late December. If injury is confirmed, provisional duties could be imposed as early as January, raising costs for importers and potentially tightening supply for fleets relying on lower-cost Chinese van and reefer bodies.

...

Currently, there are 158 special import measures in force in Canada, covering a wide variety of industrial and consumer products. In 2024, these measures have directly helped to protect approximately 45,000 Canadian jobs and $18.4 billion in Canadian production.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On a somewhat related note, we can't get domestically-assembled diesel-generator and battery hybrid commercial trucks on the road due to a quirk in emissions standards rules. We should adopt or at least be compatible with Euro standards here.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That is a work in progress (the linked article is 3 months old), and the founders of Edison have reported progress in their talks with the federal government. To the point where they are able to deliver their first customer truck in the very near future.

The issue isn't that their hybrid truck design is specifically against regulations, and more that their approach isn't something that the regulations had a permissible category for. (There isn't a specific regulation that directly permits their type of diesel-electric hybrid truck using the type of generators they are using, so they don't fit into a pre-approved definition under the existing law)

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

You are correct on that. Something interesting to note, this novel truck engine operating principle is more like a diesel-electric train engine than a car.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

You know what? We had the Lion Electric schoolbus and van manufacturer. The founder was a friend of one of the members of the CAQ, Pierre Fitzgibbon. It was a great project with lots of potential. But as most greedy fucking CEOs do, they ran this thing in the ground with no vision whatsoever. What a fucking waste.